The Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting and Verification of Climate Change Projects
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Because of concerns with the growing threat of global climate change from increasing emissions of greenhouse gases, the United States and other countries are implementing, by themselves or in cooperation with one or more other nations, climate change projects. These projects will reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or sequester carbon, and will also result in non-GHG benefits (i.e., environmental, economic, and social benefits). Monitoring, evaluating, reporting, and verifying (MERV) guidelines are needed for these projects to accurately determine their net GHG, and other, benefits. Implementation of MERV guidelines is also intended to: (1) increase the reliability of data for estimating GHG benefits; (2) provide real-time data so that mid-course corrections can be made; (3) introduce consistency and transparency across project types and reporters; and (4) enhance the credibility of the projects with stakeholders. In this paper, we review the issues involved in MERV activities. We identify several topics that future protocols and guidelines need to address, such as: (1) establishing a credible baseline; (2) accounting for impacts outside project boundaries through leakage; (3) net GHG reductions and other benefits; (4) precision of measurement; (5) MERV frequency and the persistence (sustainability) of savings, emissions reduction, and carbon sequestration; (6) reporting by multiple project participants; (7) verification of GHG reduction credits; (8) uncertainty and risk; (9) institutional capacity in conducting MERV; and (10) the cost of MERV.
- Andrasko, K. (1997) Forest Management for Greenhouse Gas Benefits: Resolving Monitoring Issues Across Project and National Boundaries. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2: pp. 117-132
- Andrasko, K., Carter, L. and Van der Gaast, W.: 1996, Technical Issues in JI/AIJ Projects: A Survey and Potential Responses, a background paper prepared for the Critical Issues Working Group, for the UNEP AIJ Conference, San Jose, Costa Rica.
- Dudek, D., Weiner, J. (1996) Joint Implementation, Transaction Costs, and Climate Change. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, France
- SGS Forestry Carbon Offset Verification Services. United Kingdom, Draft. SGS Forestry, Oxford
- Embree, C. (Sid): 1994, Monitoring, Accounting, Verifying, and Reporting on Joint Implementation Activities: Preliminary Issues and Considerations, presented at the Workshop on Designing Joint Project Mechanisms to Promote Benefits for Developing Countries, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Dec. 13- 15.
- Heister, J. (1996) Towards a Methodology for Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Offsets from Joint Implementation Projects and Activities Implemented Jointly, draft working paper. Global Climate Change Unit, Global Environment Division, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
- Greenhouse Gas Inventory Workbook and Reporting Instructions. IPCC, Bracknell, United Kingdom
- MacDicken, K. (1997) Project Specific Monitoring and Verification: State of the Art and Challenges. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2: pp. 191-202
- MacDicken, K. (1996) A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Sequestration in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects. Forest Carbon Monitoring Program, Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, Arlington, Virginia
- Meier, A., Solomon, B. (1995) The EPA's Protocols for Verifying Savings from Utility Energy-Conservation Programs. Energy: The International Journal 20: pp. 105-115
- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UNEP/WMO Information Unit on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland
- UNFCCC: 1997, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention of Climate Change, FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1, Dec. 10, 1997.
- UNFCCC: 1998, Non-paper on Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines for an International Emissions Trading Regime, FCCC/SB/1998/MISC.1/Add.1/Rev.1.
- Strategies for Financing Energy Efficiency. Business Focus Series. U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C.
- Acid Rain CEMS Program Submission Instructions. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
- Conservation and Verification Protocols, Version 2.0. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
- The User's Guide to the Conservation and Verification Protocols, Version 2.0. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
- Guidelines for a USIJI Project Proposal. U.S. Initiative on Joint Implementation, Washington, D.C.
- Vine, E., Sathaye, J. (1997) The Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting, and Verification of Climate Change Mitigation Projects: Discussion of Issues and Methodologies and Review of Existing Protocols and Guidelines. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
- Watt, E., Sathaye, J., de Buen, O., Masera, O., Gelil, I., Ravindranath, N., Zhou, D., Li, J., Intaraprvich, D. (1995) The Institutional Needs of Joint Implementation Projects. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
- Greenhouse Gas Abatement Investment Project Monitoring & Evaluation Guidelines. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
- Incorporating Social Assessment and Participation Into Biodiversity Conservation Projects. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
- The Monitoring, Evaluation, Reporting and Verification of Climate Change Projects
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
Volume 4, Issue 1 , pp 43-60
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- carbon offsets
- emission trading
- energy efficiency
- global climate change
- greenhouse gas emissions
- joint implementation
- Industry Sectors