Skip to main content
Log in

Pragmatic Holism (or pragmatic reductionism)

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reductionist/holist debate is highly polarised. I propose an intermediate position of pragmatic holism. It derives from two claims: firstly, that irrespective of whether all natural systems are theoretically reducible, for many systems it is utterly impractical to attempt such a reduction, and secondly, that regardless of whether irreducible 'wholes’ exist, it is vain to try and prove this. This position illuminates the debate along new pragmatic lines by refocussing attention on the underlying heuristics of learning about the natural world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983, Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 352 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremermann, H.J.: 1967, Quantal Noise and Information. 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 4: 15-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaitin, G.J.: 1995, Randomness in Arithmetic and the Decline and Fall of Reductionism in Pure Mathematics. In J. Cornwell (ed.), Nature's Imagination. Oxford University Press, 27-44. http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/CDMTCS/chaitin/unm.html

  • Cutland, N.J.: 1980, Computability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, B.: 1997, The Possible Irreducibility of Software Artificial Life. CPM Report 97-14, MMU, UK. http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/cpmrep14.html

  • Edmonds, B.: 1999, What is Complexity? — the Philosophy of Complexity per se with Application to Some Examples in Evolution. In F. Heylighen and D. Aerts (eds.), The Evolution of Complexity. Dordrecht: Kluwer. http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/~bruce/evolcomp/

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, B.: in press, Capturing Social Embeddedness — a Constructivist Approach. Adaptive Behavior 7(3/4). http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/cpmrep34.html

  • Fishler, M.A. and O. Firschein: 1987, Intelligence in Eye, the Brain and the Computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D.M.: 1994, Classical vs Non-classical Logics (The Universality of Classical Logic). In D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger and J.A. Robinson (eds.), Handbook of Logic, in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Vol. 2. Oxford: OUP, 359-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, B.R.: 1976, On the Complexity of Casual Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 6: 56-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K.: 1931, Uber formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter System I. Monatschefte Math. Phys. 38: 173-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S.: 1990, The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D 42: 335-346. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/abs/psyc/199803014

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampis, G.: 1991, Self-Modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science: A New Framework for Dynamics, Information and Complexity. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 565 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampis, G.: 1995, Computability, Self-Reference, and Self-Amendment. Communication and Cognition — Artificial Intelligence 12: 91-109. http://www.c3.lanl.gov/_rocha/kampis.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, L.: 1968, An Axiomatic Explanation of complete Self-Reproduction. Bull. Math. Biophys. 30: 415-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, J-P.: 1995, Category Theory and the Foundations of Mathematics: Philosophical Excavations. Synthese 103: 421-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H.H.: 1995, Evolving Self-Reference: Matter, Symbols and Semantic Closure. Communication and Cognition — Artificial Intelligence 12: 9-27. http://ssie.binghamton.edu/~pattee/sem_clos.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R.: 1996, Beyond the Doubting of a Shadow: A Reply to Commentaries on Shadows of the Mind. Psyche 2(23). http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/volume2-1/psyche-96-2-23-shadows-10-penrose.html

  • Rosen, R.: 1985, Organisms as Causal Systems Which Are Not Mechanisms: An Essay into the Nature of Complexity. In R. Rosen (ed.), Theoretical Biology and Complexity: Three Essays on the Natural Philosophy of Complex Systems. London: Academic Press, 165-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R.: 1991, Life Itself — A Comprehensive Enquiry into the Nature, Origin and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R.: 1993, Bionics Revisited. In H. Haken, A. Karlquist and U. Svedin (eds.), The Machine as Metaphor and Tool. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 87-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, B.: 1993, Taking God Out of Mathematics and Putting the Body Back In. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S.: 1992, Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism. Synthese 91: 167-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegelmann, H.T.: 1995, Computation Beyond the Turing Limit. Science 268: 545-548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1981, The Architecture of Complexity. In The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 192-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A.M.: 1936, On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proc. London Math. Soc. 2(42): 230-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Fœrster: 1960, Self-Organising Systems and Their Environments. In M.C. Yovits and S. Cameron (eds.), Self-Organising Systems. Pergamon Press, 2-22.

  • Von Neumann, J.: 1956, Probabilistic Logic and the Synthesis of Reliable Organisms from Unreliable Parts. In C.E. Shannon (ed.), Automata Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 43-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S.: 1977, The First Three Minutes. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.: 1972, Complexity and Organisation. In K. Schaffner and R. Cohen (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Sciences, Vol. 20. Dordrecht: Reidel, 67-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S.: 1984, Cellular Automata as Models of Complexity. Nature 311: 419-424. http://www.wolfram.com/s.wolfram/articles/84-cellular/summary.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S.: 1985, Cryptography with Cellular Automata. CRYPTO '85 Proceedings: Advances in Cryptography, Santa Barbara, California; Lecture Notes in Computer Science 218: 429-432. http://www.wolfram.com/s.wolfram/articles/85-cryptography/summary.html

  • Wolfram, S.: 1986, Random Sequence Generation by Cellular Automata. Advances in Applied Mathematics 7: 123-169. http://www.wolfram.com/s.wolfram/articles/86-random/summary.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F.E.: 1978, Complexity and the Limits to Knowledge. American Journal of Physiology 235: R201-R204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edmonds, B. Pragmatic Holism (or pragmatic reductionism). Foundations of Science 4, 57–82 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009642920187

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009642920187

Navigation