Ethical Challenges for Livestock Production:Meeting Consumer Concerns about Meat Safety and AnimalWelfare
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Livestock production today faces thedifficult task of effectively meeting emergingconsumer concerns while remaining competitive on majortarget markets. Meeting consumer concerns aboutproduct safety and animal welfare are identified askey attention points for future livestock production.The relevance of these issues pertains to productionefficiency and economic benefits and tore-establishing meat sector image and consumer trust.The current paper analyses consumer concerns about theethical issues of meat safety and animal welfare fromcurrent livestock production. The research methodologyis based on literature review, secondary data sources,and primary research through focus group discussionsand a survey of 320 meat consumers in Belgium.Objectives were to assess importance attached byconsumers to product safety and animal welfare asethical issues in commercial livestock production, andto evaluate consumer perception of these issues forbeef, pork, and poultry. Significant differences inissue importance and perception are identified amongconsumer groups based on socio-demographic andbehavioral characteristics. From the analysis, meatsafety emerges as an absolute but minimum requirementfor future success of livestock and meat production.Additionally, animal welfare can be expected to becomea critical theme especially for pork and poultryacceptance.
- Bansback, R., “Towards a Broader Understanding of Meat Demand,” Journal of Agricultural Economics 46 (1995), 287-308.
- Blanford, D. and L. Fulponi, “Consumer Concerns and Public Policy for Agriculture,” in V. Beekman and F. Brom (eds.), First European Congress on Agricultural and Food Ethics: Preprints (Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research Centre, 1999), pp. 19-25.
- Brom, F. W. A., “Food, Consumer Concerns and Trust,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2(2), pp. 127-139. This issue.
- Demeyer, D., “Modern Production Methods and Meat Quality: An Integrated Relationship,” in G. Enne and G. Elias (eds.), Proceedings International Workshop on Certification System for Agroindustrial Products and their Quality: The Case of Fresh Bovine and Pork Meat (Milan: UNI and Fondazione Cariplo per la Ricerca Scientifica, 1993), pp. 82-92.
- Den Ouden, M., Economic Modelling of Pork Production-Marketing Chains, Ph.D. Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands (1996).
- Frewer, L., C. Howard, D. Hedderley, and R. Shepherd, “Methodological Approaches to Assessing Risk Perceptions Associated With Food-related Hazards,” Risk Analysis 18 (1998), 95-102.
- Hughes, D., “Animal welfare: The Consumer and The Food Industry,” British Food Journal97(10) (1995), 3-7.
- Hughes, D., “Animal welfare: The Food Industry and Government,” in T. Wallace and W. Schroder (eds.), Government and the Food Industry: Economic and Political Effects of Conflict and Co-operation (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997), pp. 205-220.
- Issanchou, S., “Consumer Expectations and Perceptions of Meat and Meat Product Quality,” Meat Science 43 (1996), S5-S19.
- Kafka, C. and R. von Alvensleben, “Consumer Perception of Food-related Hazards and the Problem of Risk Communication,” in AIR-CAT (ed.), Health, Ecological and Safety Aspects in Food Choice. AIR-CAT Series 4(1) (1998), 21-40.
- Kramer, C., “Food Safety: The Consumer Side of the Environmental Issue,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 22 (1990), 33-40.
- Ödberg, F., “Dierenwelzijn: een wetenschappelijke benadering [AnimalWelfare Scientifically Approached],” Proceedings of 47th PUO-day, Vlees: Van Producent Tot Consument [Meat from Producer to Consumer], Verhandelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen, University of Ghent 38 (1998), 121-138.
- Osgood, C., G. Suci, and P. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning (Urbana: The University of Illinois Press, 1957).
- PVE, “Media-aandacht vee-en vleessector laat consument onberoerd [Media Attention Livestock and Meat Leaves Consumers Indifferent],” PVE-Sectorinfo 46 (1997), 1-2.
- Sparks, P. and R. Shepherd, “Public Perceptions of Food-related Hazards: Individual and Social Dimensions,” Food Quality and Preference 5 (1994), 185-194.
- Strak, J., R. Ward, and D. Hallam, The Effectiveness of MLC' Meat Promotion in the UK (1990-1997) (Cambridgehire: EuroPA and Associates, 1997).
- Van Trijp, H., Variety Seeking in Product Choice Behavior: Theory with Application in the Food Domain, Ph.D. Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands (1995).
- Verbeke, W., Factors Influencing the Consumer Decision-making Process Toward Meat, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Ghent, Belgium (1999).
- Verbeke, W. and J. Viaene, “Consumentengedrag ten aanzien van vlees in België [Consumer Behaviour Towards Meat in Belgium],” TSL Tijdschrift voor Sociaal wetenschappelijk onderzoek van de Landbouw 13 (1998a), 20-40.
- Verbeke, W. and J. Viaene, “Consumer Behaviour Towards Meat in Belgium,” in C. Viau (ed.), Long-term Prospects for the Beef Industry (Ivry-sur-Seine: INRA, 1998b), pp. 281-291.
- Verbeke, W. and J. Viaene, “Beliefs, Attitude and Behaviour Towards Fresh Meat Consumption in Belgium: Empirical Evidence from a Consumer Survey,” Food Qualityand Preference, 10 (1999), 437-445.
- Verbeke, W., M. Van Oeckel, N. Warnants, J. Viaene, and C. Boucqué, “Consumer Perception, Facts and Possibilities to Improve Acceptability of Health and Sensory Characteristics of Pork,” Meat Science 53 (1999), 77-99.
- Verbeke, W., J. Viaene and O. Guiot, “Health Communication and Consumer Behavior on Meat in Belgium: From BSE until Dioxin,” Journal of Health Communication 4 (1999), 345-357.
- von Alvensleben, R., “Das Image von Fleisch: eine Analyse und ihre Konsequenzen für das Marketing [Meat Image: Analysis and Consequences for Marketing],” Fleischwirtschaft75(1995), 356-360.
- Ethical Challenges for Livestock Production:Meeting Consumer Concerns about Meat Safety and AnimalWelfare
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
Volume 12, Issue 2 , pp 141-151
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Animal welfare
- consumer behavior
- meat safety