Skip to main content
Log in

Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of emergent "levels" (i.e., levels that arise from interactions of objects at lower levels) is fundamental to scientific theory. In this paper, we argue for an expanded role for this concept of levels in science education. We show confusion of levels (and "slippage" between levels) as the source of many of people's deep misunderstandings about patterns and phenomena in the world. These misunderstandings are evidenced not only in students' difficulties in the formal study of science but also in their misconceptions about experiences in their everyday lives. The StarLogo modeling language is designed as a medium for students to build models of multi-leveled phenomena and through these constructions explore the concept of levels. We describe several case studies of students working in StarLogo. The cases illustrate students' difficulties with the concept of levels, and how they can begin to develop richer understandings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackermann, E. (1996). Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. In Kafai, Y., and Resnick, M. (Eds.), Constructionism in Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., and Hagan, P. (1981). Diffusion-induced morphogenesis in Dictyostelium. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 94: 881–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1968). Principles of Systems, Productivity Press, Norwalk, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The Quark and the Jaguar, W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giancoli, D. (1984). General Physics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos, Viking Penguin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., Stratford, S., Krajcik, J., and Soloway, E. (1996). A learner-centered tool for students building models. Communications of the ACM, 39: 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D. (1979). Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity, Helix Books/Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1983). A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F., and Segel, L. (1970). Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 26: 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. (1994). Out of Control, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1925). Elements of Physical Biology, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1987). The Society of Mind, Simon & Schuster, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., and Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature, Bantam Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, Termites and Traffic Jams: Explorations in Massively Parallel Microworlds, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. (1996). Beyond the centralized mindset. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M., and Wilensky, U. (1998). Diving into complexity: Developing probabilistic decentralized thinking through roleplaying activities. Journal of the Learning Science, 7: 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N., Anderson, D., Deal, R., Garet, M., and Shaffer, W. (1983). Introduction to Computer Simulations: A Systems Dynamics Modeling Approach, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roetzheim, W. (1994). Entering the Complexity Lab, SAMS/Prentice Hall, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday/Currency, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, G., and Wilson, D. (1998) Unto Others. The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipler, P. (1992). Elementary Modern Physics, Worth Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra, V. (1926). Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature, 188: 558–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Order and Chaos. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway? Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics 33: 171–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (in press). GasLab—An extensible modeling tool kit for exploring micro-and macro-views of bases. In Roberts, N., Feurzeig, W., and Hunter, B. (Eds.), Computer Modeling and Simulation in Science Education, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

  • Wilensky, U. (1996). Modeling rugby: Kick first, generalize later? International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1: 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1995a). Learning probability through building computational models. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Recife, Brazil, July 1995.

  • Wilensky, (1995b). Paradox, programming and learning, probability: A case study in a connected mathematics framework. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilensky, U., Resnick, M. Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World. Journal of Science Education and Technology 8, 3–19 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421303064

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009421303064

Navigation