Assessing the Nature of Science: What is the Nature of Our Assessments?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper discusses the nature of the instruments used to assess students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science during the last four decades. Two salient points emerge from critically reviewing the various research emphases and associated assessment instruments specifically related to the nature of science. The first is to question the validity of much of the research presented on the grounds that (a) assessment instruments are interpreted in a biased manner, and (b) some assessment instruments appear to be poorly constructed. Although such comments are well founded, it is important to note that the research conclusions were unusually uniform regardless of the particular instrument used in an investigation. The second point is a more critical concern about the “traditional” paper and pencil approach to the assessment of an individual's understanding of the nature of science. Although not a new insight, discrepancies between the interpretation of a written response to a “traditional” instrument (e.g., multiple choice assessment) and the intent of the respondent have been well documented. It is suggested that the current educational research shift toward more qualitative, open-ended approaches to assessment of individuals' understanding (of any concept) be applied to the assessment of individuals' nature of science conceptions.
Aikenhead, G.: 1972, The measurement of knowledge about science and scientists: An investigation into the development of instruments for formative evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.
Aikenhead, G.: 1973, ‘The Measurement of High School Students' Knowledge About Science and Scientists’, Science Education, 57(4), 539–549.
Aikenhead, G.: 1979, ‘Science: A Way of Knowing’, Science Education, 46(6), 23–25.
Aikenhead, G.: 1987, ‘High School Graduates' Beliefs About Science-Technology-Society: Characteristics and Limitations of Science Knowledge’, Science Education, 71(4), 459–487.
Aikenhead, G., Fleming, R.W. & Ryan, A.G.: 1987, ‘High School Graduates' Beliefs About Science-Technology-Society: Methods and Issues in Monitoring Student Views’, Science Education, 71(2), 145–161.
Aikenhead, G. & Ryan, A.G.: 1992, ‘The Development of a New Instrument: “Views on Science-Technology-Society” (VOSTS)’, Science Education, 76(5), 477–491.
Allen, H. Jr.: 1959, Attitudes of certain high school seniors toward science and scientific careers’, Teachers College Press.
Alters, B.J.: 1996, Whose nature of science? Paper presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1989, Science for All Americans: A Project 2061 Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1993, Benchmarks for Science Literacy: A Project 2061 Report. Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. (Published simultaneously by Oxford University Press, New York).
Bates, G.: 1974, A search for subscales in the Science Process Inventory. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting for the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
Bell, R.L. & Lederman, N.G.: 1996, [COST results for high school students enrolled in a summer science apprenticeship program and undergraduate students enrolled in a geology course for nonmajors]. Unpublished raw data.
Billeh, V.Y. & Hasan, O.: 1975, ‘Factors Affecting Teachers' Gain in Understanding the Nature of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(3), 209–219.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS): 1962, Processes of science test. New York: the Psychological Corporation.
Brickhouse, N. W.: 1990. ‘Teachers' Beliefs About the Nature of Science and Their Relationship to Classroom Practice’, Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62.
Briscoe, C.: 1991, ‘The Dynamic Interactions Among Beliefs, Role Metaphors and Teaching Practices: A Study of Teacher Change’, Science Education, 75(2), 185–199.
Bronowski, J.: 1956, Science and human values. New York: Harper & Row.
Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers: 1907, ‘A Consideration of the Principles that Should Determine the Courses in Biology in the Secondary Schools’, Science and Mathematics, 7, 241–247.
Conant, J.B.: 1951, Science and common sense. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Cooley, W. & Klopfer, L.: 1961, Test on understanding science, Form W. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Cooley, W. & Klopfer, L.: 1963, ‘The Evaluation of Specific Education Innovations’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1,(1), 73–80.
Cotham, J.: 1979, Development, validation, and application of the conceptions of scientific theories test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
Cotham, J. & Smith, E.: 1981, ‘Development and Validation of the Conceptions of Scientific Theories Test’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(5), 387–396.
Duschl, R.: 1990, Restructuring science education: the importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Duschl, R. A. & Wright, E.: 1989, ‘A Case Study of High School Teachers' Decision Making Models for Planning and Teaching Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(6), 467–501.
Fraser, B.J.: 1978, ‘Development of a Test of Science-Related Attitudes’, Science Education, 62(4), 509–515.
Fraser, B.J.: 1980, ‘Development and Validation of a Test of Inquiry Skills’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(1), 7–16.
Gallagher, J.J.: 1991, ‘Prospective and Practicing Secondary School Science Teachers' Knowledge and Beliefs About the Philosophy of Science’, Science Education, 75(1), 121–133.
Hillis, S.R.: 1975, ‘The Development of an Instrument to Determine Student Views of the Tentativeness of Science’. In Research and Curriculum Development in Science Education: Science Teacher Behavior and Student Affective and Cognitive Learning (Vol. 3). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Hodson, D.H.: 1993, ‘Philosophic Stance of Secondary School Science Teachers, Curriculum Experiences, and Children's Understanding of Science: Some Preliminary Findings’, Interchange, 24, 41–52.
Hukens, A.A.: 1963, A factorial investigation of measures of achievement of objectives in science teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Hungerford, H. & Walding, H.: 1974, The modification of elementary methods students' concepts concerning science and scientists. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Science Teachers Association.
Hurd, P.D.: 1960, Biological education in American secondary schools, 1890–1960. Washington, DC: AIBS.
Kimball, M.E.: 1967–1968, ‘Understanding the Nature of Science: A Comparison of Scientists and Science Teachers’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5(2), 110–120.
Korth, W.: 1969, Test every senior project: Understanding the social aspects of science. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
Kuhn, T.J.: 1970, The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lantz, O. & Kass, H. 1987, ‘Chemistry Teachers' Functional Paradigms’, Science Education, 71(1), 117–134.
Lederman, N.G.: 1992, ‘Students' and Teachers' Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29(4), 331–359.
Lederman, N.G.: 1995, The influence of teachers' conceptions of science on classroom practice: A story of five teachers. A paper presented at the 3rd International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Bell, R.L.: 1997. Knowing and doing: The flight of the nature of science from the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Lederman, N. & O'Malley, M.: 1990, ‘Students' Perception of Tentativeness in Science: Development, Use, and Sources of Change’, Science Education. 74(2), 225–239.
Lederman, N. & Zeidler, D.: 1987, ‘Science Teachers' Conceptions of the Nature of Science: Do They Really Influence Teacher Behavior?’, Science Education, 71(5), 721–734.
Lucas, A.M.: 1975, ‘Hidden Assumptions in Measures of “Knowledge About Science and Scientists”’, Science Education. 59(4), 481–485.
Meichtry, Y.J.: 1992, ‘Influencing Student Understanding of the Nature of Science: Data from a Case of Curriculum Development’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29(4), 389–407.
Mackay, L.D.: 1971, ‘Development of Understanding About the Nature of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(1), 57–66.
Martin, M.: 1972, Concepts of science education. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman & Co.
Matthews, M.R.: 1994. Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
Moore, R. & Sutman, F.: 1970, ‘The Development, Field Test and Validation of an Inventory of Scientific Attitudes’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7(2), 85–94.
Munby, H.: 1983, An investigation into the measurement of attitudes in science education. Columbus, OH: SMEAC Information Reference Center.
National Research Council: 1996, National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association: 1982. Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980's. Washington DC: Author.
National Society for Study of Education: 1960, Rethinking science education (59th Year-book, Part I). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nott, M. & Wellington, J.: 1995 ‘Probing Teachers' Views of the Nature of Science: How Should We Do It and Where Should We Be Looking?’, Proceedings of the Third International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, pp. 864–872.
Ogunniyi, M.B.: 1982, ‘An Analysis of Prospective Science Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(1), 25–32.
Robinson, J.: 1969, ‘Philosophy of Science: Implications for Teacher Education’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6(1), 99–104.
Rubba, P. 1976, Nature of scientific knowledge scale. School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Rubba, P.A.: 1977, The development, field testing, and validation of an instrument to assess secondary school students' understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
Rubba, P. & Anderson, H.: 1978, ‘Development of an Instrument to Assess Secondary School Students' Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge’, Science Education, 62(4), 449–458.
Sholwalter, V.M.: 1974, ‘What is Unified Science Education? Program Objectives and Scientific Literacy’, Prism II, 2, 3–4.
Schwirian, P.: 1968, ‘On Measuring Attitudes Toward Science’, Science Education, 52(2), 172–179.
Scientific Literacy Research Group: 1967, Wisconsin inventory of science processes. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin.
Smith, E.L. & Anderson, C.W.: 1984, ‘Plants as Producers: A Case Study of Elementary Science Teaching’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(7), 685–698.
Stice, G. 1958, Facts about science test. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Swan, M.D.: 1966, ‘Science Achievement as it Relates to Science Curricula and Programs at the Sixth Grade Level in Montana Public Schools’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(2), 102–123.
Wade, P.D. & Lederman, N.: 1995, ‘College Students' Conceptions of Science and Science Content’, Proceedings of the Third International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, pp. 1271–1276.
Wheeler, S.: 1968, Critique and revision of an evaluation instrument to measure students' understanding of science and scientists. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Welch, W.: 1966, Science process inventory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Welch, W.: 1969, ‘Curriculum Evaluation’, Review of Educational Research, 39, 429–443.
Welch, W.: 1981, ‘Inquiry in School Science’, In N.C. Harms & R.E. Yager (Eds.), What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3). Washington DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Wilson, L.: 1954, ‘A Study of Opinions Related to the Nature of Science and its Purpose in Society’, Science Education, 38(2), 159–164.
- Assessing the Nature of Science: What is the Nature of Our Assessments?
Science & Education
Volume 7, Issue 6 , pp 595-615
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links