Spider communities as tools in monitoring reclaimed limestone quarry landforms
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Spider communities are sensitive to a wide range of environmental factors and are potential ecological indicators which may be effective in the assessment and monitoring of restored ecosystems. One restoration technique of disused limestone quarry faces, landform replication, attempts to create landforms and ecosystems similar to those found on natural dalesides. Vegetation surveys indicate that communities developing on landform replications are more closely allied to natural dalesides than are those of naturally recolonised disused quarries. Assessment of the spider communities of three landform replication sites, a natural limestone daleside and seven naturally recolonised disused limestone quarries, using DECORANA and TWINSPAN, produced differing patterns of sites than those observed through the assessment of the vegetation communities. DECORANA assessment based on vascular plant species composition highlights the similarities between daleside and reclaimed site communities. The sensitivity of spider communities to vegetation structure and extent of bare ground highlights differences between sites and provides evidence of important differences in vegetation community development particularly in relation to cover and structure. Implications for the assessment of reclamation and restoration techniques are discussed.
- Asselin, A. 1988. Changes in grassland use: consequences on landscape patterns and spider distribution. In Connectivity in Landscape Ecology. pp. 85–88. Edited by K.-F. Scheiber. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar of the International Association of Landscape Ecology.
- Bell, J.R., Cullen, W.R. and Wheater, C.P. 1998. The structure of spider communities in limestone quarry environments. pp. 253–259. Edited by Seldon P. Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh 1997.
- Cullen, W.R., Wheater, C.P. and Dunleavy, P.J. 1998. An assessment of vegetation communities established on reclaimed limestone quarry faces in Derbyshire, UK. Biol. Cons. 84: 25–33.
- Döbel, H.G., Denno, R.F. and Coddington, J.A. 1990. Spider (Araneae) community structure in an intertidal salt marsh: Effects of vegetation structure and tidal flooding. Environ. Entomol. 19: 1356–1370.
- Duffey, E. 1975. Habitat selection by spiders in man-made environments. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Arachnology, Amsterdam, pp. 52–67.
- Gagen, P.J., Gunn, J. and Bailey D.E. 1993. Landform replication on quarried limestone rock slopes in the English Peak District. Z. Geomorphologie Suppl. BD.87: 163–70.
- Gibson, C.W.D., Hambler, C. and Brown, V.K. 1992a. Changes in spider (Araneae) assemblages in relation to succession and grazing management. J. Appl. Ecol. 29: 132–142.
- Gibson, C.W.D., Brown, V.K., Losito, L. and McGavin, G.C. 1992b. The responses of invertebrate assemblages to grazing. Ecography 15: 166–176.
- Hill M.O. 1979a. DECORANA–A FORTRAN Program for Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. Cornell University, New York.
- Hill M.O. 1979b. TWINSPAN–A FORTRAN Program for arranging Multivariate data in an Ordered Two Way Table by Classification of the Individuals and the Attributes. Cornell University, New York.
- Hopkins P.J. and Webb, N.R. 1984. The composition of the beetle and spider faunas on fragmented heathlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 935–946.
- Jones-Walters, L. 1988. The management of chalk grassland for the conservation of invertebrate populations with special reference to Martin Down and Aston Rowant National Nature Reserves. EFU Report 32. English Nature, Peterborough.
- Mader H.-J. 1988. The significance of paved agricultural roads as barriers to ground dwelling arthropods. In Connectivity in Landscape Ecology. pp. 97–100. Edited by K.F. Schreiber. Muntersche Geographische Arbeiten 29, Ferdinand Schoningh, Paderborn, Germany.
- Maelfait, J.P., Desender, K. and Baert, L. 1989. Some examples of the practical use of spiders and carabid beetles as ecological indicators. Comptes rendus du symposium ‘Invertebres de Belgique’, Brussels, pp. 437–442.
- Malloch, A.J.C. 1988. Vespan II. University of Lancaster, Lancaster.
- Morris, M.G. 1992. The need for process studies at the landscape scale. In Landscape Ecology in Britain, the Proceedings of the First Meeting of the UK Region of the International Association of Landscape Ecology (IALE-UK). pp. 66–75.
- Rushton, S.P. 1988. The effects of scrub management regimes on the spider fauna of chalk grassland, Castor Hanglands National Nature Reserve, Cambridgeshire, UK. Biol. Cons. 46: 169–182.
- Rushton, S.P. and Eyre, M.D. 1992. Grassland spider habitats in north-east England. J. Biog. 19: 99–108.
- Rushton, S.P., Luff, M.L. and Eyre, M.D. 1989. Effects of pasture improvement and management on the ground beetle and spider communities of upland grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 26: 489–503.
- Rushton, S.P., Topping, C.J. and Eyre, M.D. 1987. The habitat preferences of grassland spiders as identified using Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DECORANA). Bull. British Arachnological Soc. 7 (6): 165–170.
- Siepel, H. 1989. Objective selection of indicator species for nature management. Comptes rendus du symposium ‘Invertebres de Belgique’, Brussels, pp. 443–446.
- Speight, M.C.D. 1986. Criteria for the selection of insects to be used as bio-indicators in nature conservation research. pp. 485–488. Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress of Entomology, Amsterdam.
- Uetz, G.W. 1991. Habitat structure and spider foraging. In Habitat Structure. pp. 325–348. Edited by Bell, S.S., McCoy, E.D. and Mushinsky, H.R. Chapman and Hall, London.
- Webb, N.R. and Hopkins P.J. (1984) Invertebrate diversity on fragmented Calluna heathlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 921–933.
- Wise, D.H. 1993. Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Wheater, C.P. and Cullen W.R. 1997. Invertebrate communities of disused and restoration blasted limestone quarries in Derbyshire. Restoration Ecol. 5 (1): 77–84.
- Spider communities as tools in monitoring reclaimed limestone quarry landforms
Volume 15, Issue 5 , pp 401-406
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links