Skip to main content
Log in

The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A meaningful interpretation of landscape metrics is possible only when the limitations of each measure are fully understood, the range of attainable values is known, and the user is aware of potential shifts in the range of values due to characteristics of landscape patches. To examine the behavior of landscape metrics, we generated artificial landscapes that mimicked fragmentation processes while controlling the size and shape of patches in the landscape and the mode of disturbance growth. We developed nine series of increasingly fragmented landscapes and used these to investigate the behavior of edge density, contagion, mean nearest neighbor distance, mean proximity index, perimeter-area fractal dimension, and mass fractal dimension. We found that most of the measures were highly correlated, especially contagion and edge density, which had a near-perfect inverse correspondence. Many of the measures were linearly-associated with increasing disturbance until the proportion of disturbance on the landscape was approximately 0.40, with non-linear associations at higher proportions. None of the measures was able to differentiate between landscape patterns characterized by dispersed versus aggregated patches. The highest attainable value of each measure was altered by either patch size or shape, and in some cases, by both attributes. We summarize our findings by discussing the utility of each metric.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrén, H. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355–366.

  • Burrough, P.A. 1981. Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature 294: 240–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principles of geographic information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture. 1982. National Forest System land and resource management planning. 36 CFR Part 219. Fed. Reg. 47: 43051.

  • Dunn, C.P., D.M. Sharpe, G.R. Guntenspergen, F. Stearns and Z. Yang. 1991. Methods for analyzing temporal changes in landscape pattern. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. pp. 173–198. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R.H. and R.V. O'Neill. 1991. Pattern, process, and predictability: the use of neutral models for landscape analysis. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. pp. 289–307. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, T. and A. Aharony. 1987. Accessible external perimeters of percolation clusters. J. Phys. A: Math Gen. 20: L1193-L1201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E.J. and G.R. Parker. 1992. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecol. 7: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, D.G., L.L. Kupper and K.E. Muller. 1988. Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Second edition. PWS-Kent, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummel, J.R., R.H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, R.V. O'Neill and P.R. Coleman. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. and J.F. Reynolds. 1993. A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 8: 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., J.F. Franklin, F.J. Swanson and T.A. Spies. 1993. Developing alternative forest cutting patterns: a simulation approach. Landscape Ecol. 8: 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, S. 1982. Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas. Science 216: 185–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K. and B. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR–351.

  • McGarigal, K. and W.C. McComb. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecol. Mon. 65: 235–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T. 1991. Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. pp. 199–235. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T. 1992. Spatial aggregation and neutral models in fractal landscapes. Am. Nat. 139: 32–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T., M.G. Turner, J.A Wiens and A.R. Johnson. 1992. Interactions between the fractal geometry of landscapes and allometric herbivory. Theor. Pop. Biol. 41: 337–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, B.T. 1994. Pattern analysis for landscape evaluation and characterization. In Eastside Forest Ecosystem Health Assessment. Vol. II.: Ecosystem Management: Principles and Applications. pp 121–134. Edited by M.E. Jensen and P.S. Bourgeron. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR–318.

  • Musick, H.B. and H.D. Grover. 1991. Image textural measures as indices of landscape pattern. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. pp. 289–307. Edited by M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, E.R., R.D. Ramsey and D.S. Winn. 1993. A modified fractal dimension as a measure of landscape diversity. Photogrammetric Eng. and Remote Sensing 59: 1517–1520.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R.V., J.R. Krummel, R.H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, B. Jackson, D.L. DeAngelis, B.T. Milne, M.G. Turner, B. Zygmunt, S.W. Christensen, V.H. Dale and R.L. Graham. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 1: 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripple, W.J., G.A. Bradshaw and T.A. Spies. 1991. Measuring forest landscape patterns in the Cascade Range of Oregon, USA. Biol. Cons. 57: 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, M. and M.A. Moroge. Scale dependent effects of habitat fragmentation on population density. In prep.

  • Ritters, K.H., R.V. O'Neill, C.T. Hunsaker, J.D. Wickham, D.H. Yankee, S.P. Timmins, K.B. Jones and B.L. Jackson. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10: 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robards, F.C. and J.I. Hodges. 1976. Observations from 2,760 bald eagle nests in southeast Alaska: progress report 1969–1976. USDI Fish andWildlife Service, Eagle management study, Juneau, AK.

  • Rogers, C.A. 1993. Describing landscapes: indices of structure. M.S. Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spetich, M.A., G.R. Parker and R.J. Gustafson. 1997. Spatial and temporal relationships of old-growth and secondary forests in Indiana. Natural Areas Journal 17: 118–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies, T.A., W.J. Ripple and G.A. Bradshaw. 1994. Dynamics and pattern of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecol. Appl. 4: 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, D. 1985. Introduction to percolation theory. Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G. 1990. Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecol. 4: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., R.V. O'Neill, R.H. Gardner and B.T. Milne. 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 3: 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R.F. 1984. The fractal dimension of percolation cluster hulls. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 17: L373-L377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, R.F. 1988. Fractals in nature: from characterization to simulation. In The Science of Fractal Images. pp. 21–70. Edited by H.O. Peitgen and D. Saupe. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, D.O., F.J. Swanson and B. Marks. 1994. Landscape pattern response to changes in pattern generation rules: land-use legacies in forestry. Ecol. Appl. 4: 569–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb, R.F., C.S. Robbins, J.F. Lynch, B.L. Whitcomb, M.K. Klimkiewicz and D. Bystrak. 1981. Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the eastern deciduous forest. In Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes. pp. 125–205. Edited by R.L. Burgess and D.M. Sharpe. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hargis, C.D., Bissonette, J.A. & David, J.L. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 13, 167–186 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007965018633

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007965018633

Navigation