Abstract
An examination of the role ofUniversity weed scientists in herbicide efficacyresearch and long-term weed management studies raisesseveral important questions: who should do what kindof research and what kind of research should be done,and, because the university is a research institutionfunded by the public, there is also the importantquestion of who should pay for the research. Indeveloping a response to these questions, severaldimensions of the relationships within which weedscience works must be considered. The author‘sexperience has demonstrated that production, thedominant value in agriculture, provides a sufficientanswer to the questions for many in weed science.However, when weed scientists claim credit forexcellence in production they must also acceptsociety‘s right to hold them responsible for problemsthey now treat as externalities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, William (1991), “The goals of agriculture,” in C. Blatz (ed.), Ethics and agriculture: An anthology on current issues in world context(pp. 56–62). Moscow, ID: Univ. of Idaho Press.
Ashby, Eric (1979), “Reflection on the costs and benefits of environmental pollution,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine23: 7–24.
Bella, David A. (1987), “Engineering and erosion of trust,” J. of Professional Issues in Engineering113: 117–129.
Berry, Wendell (1981), The gift of good land: Further essays cultural and agricultural(p. 137). San Francisco, CA: North Point Press.
Berry, Wendell (1977), The Unsettling of America Culture and Agriculture. New York, NY: Avon Books, 172 pp.
Burkhardt, J. (1986), “The value measure in public agricultural research,” in L. Busch, and W. B. Lacy (eds.), The agricultural scientific enterprise: A system is transition. Westview Special Studies in Agricultural Science and Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Busch, L., and W. B. Lacy (1983), Science, agriculture, and the politics of research.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Busch, L, W. B. Lacy, J. Burkhardt, and L. R. Lacy. (1991), Plants, power and profit: Social, economic, and ethical consequences of the new biotechnologies(pp. 7–8 and 191–192). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Buttel, Frederick H. (1990), “Biotechnology, agriculture, and rural America: Socioeconomic and ethical issues,” in S. M. Gendel, A. David Kline, D. M. Warren, and F. Yates (eds.), Agricultural bioethics: Implications of agricultural biotechnology(pp. 227–250). Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ. Press.
Buttel, F. H. (1985), “The landgrant system: A sociological perspective on value conflicts and ethical issues,” Agriculture and Human Values2(2): 78–95.
Comstock, G. (1989), “Genetically engineered herbicide resistance. Part 1,” J. Agric. Ethics2: 263–306.
Comstock, G. (1990), “Genetically engineered herbicide resistance. Part 2,” J. Agric. Ethics3: 114–146.
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (1990), Alternative agriculture. Scientists’ review. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). Spec. Pub. No. 16. CAST, Ames, IA.
Dahlberg, Kenneth. A. (1986), New directions for agriculture and agricultural research: Neglected dimensions and emerging alternatives(p.10). Totowa, NJ: Rowan andAllanheld.
Dahlberg, Kenneth A. (1989), “The value content of agricultural technologies and their effect on rural regions and farmers,” J. Agric. Ethics2: 87–96.
Daly, H. E. (1996), Beyond growth(p. 7). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Day, B. E. (1978), “The morality of agronomy,” in J. W. Pendleton (ed.), Agronomy in today’s society, Spec Pub. No. 33. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Dekker, J., and G. Comstock (1992), “Ethical and environmental considerations in the release of herbicide resistant crops,” Agriculture and Human Values9(3): 31–43.
Dundon, Stanislaus (1982), “Hidden obstacles to creativity in agricultural science,” in R. Haynes, and R. Lanier (eds.), Agriculture, change, and human values. Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Conference, October 18–21, 1982(pp. 836–868). Gainesville, FL: Humanities and Agriculture Program, University of Florida.
Gasser, C. S., and R. T. Fraley (1989), “Genetically engineering plants for crop improvement,” Science244: 1293–1299.
Goldberg, R., J. Rissler, H. Shand, and C. Hassebrook (1990), Biotechnology’s bitter harvest: Herbicide tolerant crops and the threat to sustainable agriculture. Report of the Biotechnology Working Group. Washington, DC.
Hightower, James (1972), Hard tomatoes, hard times. The original hightower report. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co.
Jonas, Hans (1985), “Toward a philosophy of technology,” in L. Hickman (ed.), Philosophy, technology and human affairs(pp. 6–24). Ibis Press of College Station, TX.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions(pp. 92 and 109) 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levidow, L, and S. Carr (1997), “How biotechnology regulation sets a risk/ethics boundary,” Agriculture And Human Values14(1): 29–43.
Lockeretz, William, and Molly D. Anderson (1993), Agricultural research alternatives(p. 3). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Ruttan, Vernon W. (1991), “Moral responsibility in agricultural research,” in Charles Blatz (ed.), Ethics and agriculture: An anthology on current issues is world context(pp. 272–284). Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Press.
Swift, Jonathan (1726), Gulliver’s travels(p. 129). New York, NY: Washington Square Press/Pocket Books Publication.
Taylor, Charles (1991), The ethics of authenticity(p. 6). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, Paul B. (1995), The spirit of the soil. Agriculture and environmental ethics.London: Routledge.
Whitehead, Alfred North (1929), “The organization of thought,” Chap VIII, The aims of education and other essays(pp. 103–104). New York: The Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimdahl, R.L. Rethinking agricultural research roles. Agriculture and Human Values 15, 77–84 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007492716165
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007492716165