Abstract
Percutaneous biopsy is considered one of the most important diagnostic tools to evaluate diffuse liver diseases. The introduction and widespread diffusion of ultrasounds in medical practice has improved percutaneous bioptic technique, while reducing postoperative complications. Although ultrasonography has become almost ubiquitous in prebiopsy investigation, only one third of biopsies are performed under ultrasound control. Moreover, the one-day procedure, reported in several studies to be safe and cost effective, accounted for only 4% of biopsies done. We report our experience of 142 percutaneous US-guided biopsies performed on 140 patients affected by chronic diffuse liver disease over a four-year period. Liver biopsies were performed under US guidance at the patient's bed using an anterior subcostal route. We evaluated postoperative pain, modifications of blood pressure and red cell count, hospital stay, morbidity and mortality rates, and adequacy of specimens for histologic examination. There was no operative mortality. As for major complications, one case of hemobilia occurred. As for minor complications, two cases of persistent postoperative pain required analgesic therapy. Patients were discharged the day following the procedure in all cases but two, who were discharged on the third and fifth postoperative days. Liver specimens were suitable for histologic diagnosis in all but one case, in which there were no portal spaces. According to our experience, we believe that hepatic biopsy guided by ultrasonography could replace blinded biopsy in the diagnosis of diffuse liver disease. The procedure is suitable to be performed safely on an outpatient basis.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Caturelli E, Giacobbe A, Facciorusso D, Bisceglia M, Villani MR, Siena DA, Fusilli S, Squillante MM, Andriulli A: Percutaneous biopsy in diffuse liver disease: increasing diagnostic yield and decreasing complication rate by routine ultrasound assessment of puncture site. Am J Gastroenterol 91(7):1318–1321, 1996
Pagliaro L, Rinaldi F, Craxi A: Percutaneous blind biopsy versus laparoscopy with guided biopsy in diagnosis of cirrhosis: A prospective randomized trial. Dig Dis Sci 28:39–43, 1983
Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G: Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol 2:165–173, 1986
Vautier G, Scott B, Jenkis D: Liver biopsy: blind or guide? BMJ 309:1455–1456, 1994
Younoussi ZM, Teran CJ, Ganiats TG, Carey WD: Ultrasound-Guided liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease. Dig Dis Sci 43(1):46–50, 1998
McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR: A 21 year old experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology 99:1396–1400, 1990
Janes CH, Lindor KD: Outcome of patients hospitalized for complications after outpatient liver biopsy. Ann Intern Med 118:96–98, 1993
Lindor KD, Bru C, Jorgensen RA, Rakela J, Bordas JM, Gross JB, Rodes J, McGill DB, Reading CC, James ME, Chaboneau JW, Ludwing J, Batts KP, Zinsmeister AR: The role of ultrasonography and automatic-needle biopsy in outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology 23(5):1079–1083, 1996
Sherlock S: Aspiration liver biopsy, technique and diagnostic application. Lancet 2(6370):397–401, 1945
Jacobs WH, Goldberg SB: Statement on outpatien percutaneous liver biopsy. Dig Dis Sci 34(3):322–323, 1989
Bjork JT, Foley WD, Varma RR: Percutaneous liver biopsy. Dig Dis Sci 26:146–148, 1981
Gilmore IT, Burroughs A, Murray-Lyon, Williams R, Jenkis D, Hopkins A: Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: An audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London. Gut 36:437–441, 1995
Pasha T, Gabriel S, Therneau T, Dickson ER, Lindor KD: Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Hepatology 27(5):1220–1226, 1998
Papini E, Pacella CM, Rossi Z, Bizzarri G, Fabbrini R, Nardi F, Picardi R: A randomized trial of ultrasound-guided anterior subcostal liver biopsy versus the conventional Menghini technique. J Hepatol 13:291–297, 1991
Livraghi T, Damselli B, Lombardi C, Espagoni I: Risk of the needle abdominal biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound 11:78–81, 1983
Knauer CM: Percutaneous biopsy of the liver as a procedure for outpatients. Gastroenterology 74:101–102, 1978
Lindner H: Limitations and hazard of percutaneous liver biopsy with the Mengnini needle. Experience with 80.000 liver biopsies. Dtsch Med Wochensch 39:1751–1757, 1967
Sherlock S, Dick R, Van Leewen DJ: Liver biopsy today. The Royal Free Hospital Experience. J Hepatol 1:75–85, 1984
Farrell RJ, Smiddy PF, Pilkington RM, Tobin AA, Moony EE, Temerley IJ, McDonald GS, Bowmer HA, Wilson GF, Kelleher D: Guided versus bling liver biopsy for chronic hepatitis C: Clinical benefits and costs. J Hepatol 30:580–587, 1999
Colombo M, Del Ninno E, De Franchis R: Ultrasound assisted percutaneous liver biopsy: Superiority of the Tru-cut over the Menghini needle for diagnosis of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 95:487–489, 1988
Judmaier G, Prior C, Klimpfinger M, Berlau E, Vogel W, Dietze D: Is percutaneous liver biopsy using the Tru-Cut (Travenol) needle superior to Menghini puncture? Z Gastroenterol 31:614–616, 1993
Garcia-Tsao G, Boyer JL: Outpatient liver biopsy: How safe is it? Ann Intern Med 118:150–153, 1993
Perrault J, McGill DB, Ott BJ: A 21 year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology 74:103–106, 1978
Smith BC, Desmond PV: Outpatient liver biopsy using ultrasound guidance and the biopsy gun is safe and cost effective. Aust N Z J Med 25:209–211, 1995
Joly JP, Khouani S, Decrombecque C, Razafimahaleo A, Sevestre H, Capron JP: Ultrasound-guided puncture-biopsy of the liver could replace blind puncuture biopsy in diffuse hepatopathies. Retrospective study of 1293 patients. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 19(8 -9):703–706, 1995
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rossi, P., Sileri, P., Gentileschi, P. et al. Percutaneous Liver Biopsy Using an Ultrasound-Guided Subcostal Route. Dig Dis Sci 46, 128–132 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005571904713
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005571904713