Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Automobile PAC Contributions to House Incumbents: Own Versus Rival Effects

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines PAC contributions by the Big ThreeU.S. automakers and Japanese auto dealers to Houseincumbents. A regression model is estimated where PACcontributions are a function of a firm's own ties toan incumbent's district (as measured by firmemployment) and those of rivals. For the Big Three,own and U.S. rival effects are positive. Further, theresults do not indicate the presence of a free-ridereffect. Employment by a foreign subsidiary has no neteffect on U.S. contributions. For the Japanesedealers, Japanese plant employment has a positiveimpact on contributions, and that of the Big Three anegative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barone, M. and Ujifusa G. (1996). The almanac of American politics, 1994. Washington DC: National Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R.W. and Loucks, C. (1994). Savings and loan and finance industry PAC contributions to incumbent members of the House Banking Committee. Public Choice 79: 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronars, S.G. and Lott J.R. (1997) Do campaign donations alter how a politician votes? or, do donors support candidates who value the same things that they do? Journal of Law and conomics 40: 317–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, H.W. (1982) Campaign contributions and congressional voting: A simultaneous robit-tobit model. Review of Economics and Statistics 64: 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Quarterly (1993). Washington Information Directory, 1993-1994. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F.L. (1992). Sophistication in corporate PAC contributions. American Politics Quarterly 20: 388–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A.T. and Munger, M.C. (1986). Legislators and interest groups: How unorganized interests get represented. American Political Science Review 80: 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. and Caves R. (1983). Market structure and political influence. Economic Inquiry 20: 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, R.K. (1990). Investments in rent-seeking. Public Choice 64: 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopoian, J.D. (1984). What makes PACs tick? An analysis of allocation patterns of economic interest groups. American Journal of Political Science 28: 259–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. (1993). Econometric analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K.B. and Munger, M.C. (1986). The impact of legislator attributes in interest groupcampaign contributions. Journal of Labor Research 7: 349–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K.B. and Munger, M.C. (1993). Comparing interest group PAC contributions to House and Senate incumbents, 1980-1986. Journal of Politics 55: 615–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K.B. and Munger, M.C. (1991). Committee assignments, constituent preferences, and campaign contributions. Economic Inquiry 29: 24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K.B., Munger, M.C. and Roberts B.E. (1994). The determinants of industrial political activity. American Political Science Review 88: 911–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.L. and Wayman, F.W. (1990). Buying time: Moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees. American Political Science Review 84: 797–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • iMarket Inc. (1998). D &; B MarketPlace, vol 3.0, Jan-March, iMarket Inc: Waltham, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleit, A.N. (1988). The impact of automobile fuel economy standards. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics, Working Paper 160.

  • Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magleby, D.B. and Nelson C.J. (1990). The money chase: Congressional campaign finance reform. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R.E. and Tollison R.D. (1981). Politicians, legislation, and the economy. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, M.C. (1988). On the political participation of the firm in the electoral process: An update. Public Choice 56: 295–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecorino, P. (1998). Is there a free-rider problem in lobbying? Endogenous tariffs, triggerstrategies, and the number of firms. American Economic Review 88: 652–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, R. (1977). Market structure and campaign contributions. Public Choice 31: 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman R. (1988). Rent-seeking and market structure: Comment. Public Choice 58: 173–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R.A. (1995). Interest group influence in the U.S. congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 20: 89–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf, F.J. (1988). Money in American elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratmann, T. (1992). Are contributors rational? Untangling strategies of political action committees. Journal of Political Economy 100: 647–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratmann, T. (1998). The market for congressional votes: Is timing of contributions everything? Journal of Law and Economics 41: 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1971). The economic theory of regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, W.P. (1982). Campaign contributions and legislative voting: Milk money and dairy price supports. Western Political Quarterly 35: 478–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zardkoohi, A. (1985). On the political participation of the firm in the electoral process. Southern Economic Journal 51: 804–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zardkoohi, A. (1988) Market structure and campaign contributions: Does concentration matter? Public Choice 58: 187–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hersch, P.L., McDougall, G.S. Determinants of Automobile PAC Contributions to House Incumbents: Own Versus Rival Effects. Public Choice 104, 329–343 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005179819347

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005179819347

Keywords

Navigation