Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CE is Not a Conservative Extension of E

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The logic CE (for “Classical E”) results from adding Boolean negation to Anderson and Belnap"s logic E. This paper shows that CE is not a conservative extension of E.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D., Jr,: Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, A. R., Belnap, N. D., Jr. and Dunn, J. M.: Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brady, R. T.: Cut-free Gentzenizations for relevant logics, Unpublished manuscript.

  4. Meyer, R. K.: A Boolean-Valued Semantics for R, Logic Group, Department of Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer, R. K. and Mares, E. D.: The semantics of entailment 0, in K. Došen and P. Schröder-Heister (eds), Substructural Logics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993, pp. 239–258.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer, R. K. and Routley, F. R.: Classical relevant logics I, Studia Logica 32 (1973), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer, R. K. and Routley, F. R.: Classical relevant logics II, Studia Logica 33 (1974), 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Routley, F. R. and Meyer, R. K.: The semantics of entailment III, J. Philos. Logic 1 (1972), 192–208.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Routley, F. R., Meyer, R. K., Plumwood, V. and Brady, R. T.: Relevant Logics and Their Rivals I, Ridgeview, Atascadero, CA, 1982.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand

    Edwin D. Mares

Authors
  1. Edwin D. Mares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mares, E.D. CE is Not a Conservative Extension of E . Journal of Philosophical Logic 29, 263–275 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004731401855

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004731401855

Search

Navigation