Skip to main content
Log in

Quasiclassical Born–Oppenheimer Approximations

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss several problems in quasiclassical physics for which approximate solutions were recently obtained by a new method, and which can also be solved by novel versions of the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. These cases include the so-called bouncing ball modes, low angular momentum states in perturbed circular billiards, resonant states in perturbed rectangular billiards, and whispering gallery modes. Some rare, special eigenstates, concentrated close to the edge or along a diagonal of a nearly rectangular billiard are found. This kind of state has apparently previously escaped notice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. C. Gutzwiller, J. Math. Phys. 12, 343 (1971); Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Voros, J. Phys. A21, 685 (1988). P. Cvitanovic and B. Eckhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 823 (1989). M. V. Berry and J. P. Keating, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 437, 151 (1992). E. Doron and U. Smilansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1255 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. B. Bogomolny, Nonlinearity 5, 805 (1992), and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Blümel et al., Phys. Rev. E 53, 3284 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. E. Prange, R. Narevich, and O. Zaitsev, Phys. Rev. E 59, 1694 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Borgonovi et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4744 (1996). J. U. No ckel and A. D. Stone, Nature 385, 45 (1997). K. M. Frahm and D. M. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1440 (1997). ibid. 79, 1833 (1997). F. Borgonovi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4653 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Richter, D. Ullmo, and R. A. Jalabert, Phys. Reports 276, 1 (1996). K. Richter, Habilitationsschrift der Universitat Augsburg (Max Planck-Institut, Dresden, 1997). M. Brack and R. K. Bhaduri, Semiclassical Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Primack and U. Smilansky, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27, 4439 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Kaplan and E. J. Heller, Physica D 121, 1 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Born and J. R. Oppenheimer, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 84, 457 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lord Rayleigh, Phil. Mag. 27, 100 (1914).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Dembowski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 867 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Wallraff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 151 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. B. Keller and S. I. Rubinow, Ann. Phys. (New York) 9, 24 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. A. Leontovich, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 8, 16 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. A. Fock, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 10(2), 171 (1946) [J. Phys. USSR 10, 399 (1946)]; Electromagnetic Diffraction and Propagation Problems (2nd edn., Sovetskoe Radio, Moscow, 1970; 1st edn., Pergamon, Oxford, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. M. Babich and V. S. Buldyrev, Short Wavelength Diffraction Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  18. For example, G. Baym, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, New York, 1969). A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. II (Wiley, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, Vol. II (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Y. Bai et al, Phys. Rev. A 31, 2821 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. W. McDonald, Ph.D. Thesis (Berkeley, 1983).

  22. R. Narevich, R. E. Prange, and O. Zaitsev, Phys. Rev. E 62, 2046 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Lindhard, Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 34(14) (1965).

  24. M. Sieber, Phys. Rev. E 60, 3982 (1999). E. Bogomolny, N. Pavloff and C. Schmit, Phys. Rev. E 61, 3689-3711 (2000). S. Rahav and S. Fishman, to be published, this issue.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Narevich, R. E. Prange, and Oleg Zaitsev, Physica E, to be published.

  26. V. F. Lazutkin, KAM Theory and Semiclassical Approximations to Eigenfunctions (Springer, Berlin, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun, eds. (Dover, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. D. Birkhoff, Dynamical Systems (Am. Math. Soc., New York, 1966), Vol. IX. F. G. Gustavson, Astron. J. 71, 670 (1966).

  29. V. I. Arnol'd, Funktional. Anal. i Prilozen. 6, 12 (1972) [Functional Anal. Appl. 6, 94 (1972)]. 26 Zaitsev, Narevich, and Prange

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaitsev, O., Narevich, R. & Prange, R.E. Quasiclassical Born–Oppenheimer Approximations. Foundations of Physics 31, 7–26 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004153019473

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004153019473

Keywords

Navigation