Skip to main content
Log in

Rewriting the Bases of Capitalism: Reflexive Modernity and Ecological Sustainability as the Foundations of a New Normative Framework

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The debate on sustainable globalized development rests on two clearly stated economic assumptions: that "development" proceeds, solely and inevitably, through industrialization and the proliferation of capital intensive high-technology, towards the creation of service sector economies; and that globalization, based on a neoliberal, capitalist, free market ideology, provides the only vehicle for such development. Sustainability, according to the proponents of globalized development, is merely a function of market forces, which will generate the solutions for all problems including the environmental dilemmas that loom over the globe today. The social focus of globalized development is clearly the "individual" and the much-touted goal of development in the context of these debates, is the emancipation of the individual from want. This glorification of the individual, so characteristic of the Enlightenment, has defined all aspects of modernity, leading to approaches that are self-focused and that give little thought to the needs of society or even the social context. The increasing impoverishment of human life and the growing environmental degradation, however, provide a poignant counterpoint to this onrush of capital interests, demanding a reassessment of sustainability separate from the logic of industrialization and globalized development. This paper examines the unfolding of the logic of capitalism, which underlies the structure of the Rostowian model of development and the problems in the assumptions underlying today's globalized development process. The evident impossibility of sustainability in the current growth-based market system leads to the examination of alternatives including a reflexive understanding of the choices and the inclusion of opportunity costs, related to the social, environmental and economic aspects of decision making. The integration of all factors of production into the logic of development provides a sustainable alternative to the current system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, Ulrich: 1999, The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order (Polity Press).

  • Beck, Ulrich: 1992, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. M. Ritter (Sage Publications, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bole, William: 2002, 'Enron's Collapse: No Rewriting the Bases of Capitalism 313 Corporate Works of Mercy', Our Sunday Visitor, February 10, 2002.

  • Duvall, Tim: 2003, 'The New Feudalism: Globalization, the Market, and the Great Chain of Consumption', New Political Science 25(1), 81-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John: 1980, Second Treatise of Government, C. B. Macpherson, ed. (Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, Gwyn: 1990, 'Politics and the Environment', International Affairs 66(4), 711-730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, W. W.: 1967, The Stages of Economic Growth (Cambridge University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckelshaus, William D.: 1989, 'Toward a Sustainable World', Scientific American 261(3) (September 1989), 166-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, Vandana: 1988, 'Reductionist Science as Epistemological Violence', in Ashis Nandy (ed.), Science Hegemony and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity (Oxford University Press, New Delhi), pp. 232-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shutt, Harry: 1998, The Trouble With Capitalism: An Enquiry into the Causes of Global Economic Failure (Zed Books, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stieber, John: 1998, Profit is Not a Four-Letter Word (American Management Association International, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Visvanathan, Shiv: 1988, 'On the Annals of the Laboratory State', in Ashis Nandy (ed.), Science Hegemony and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity (Oxford University Press, New Delhi), pp. 257-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development, http://www.wbcsd.

  • World Commission on Environment and Development: 1987, Our Common Future (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balakrishnan, U., Duvall, T. & Primeaux, P. Rewriting the Bases of Capitalism: Reflexive Modernity and Ecological Sustainability as the Foundations of a New Normative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 47, 299–314 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027309918415

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027309918415

Keywords

Navigation