Skip to main content
Log in

Marine Debris, Beach Quality, and Non-Market Values

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the first attempt to measure the importance of controlling marine debris as an aesthetic characteristic of beaches and coastal area. The results are based on a contingent valuation survey designed to estimate the economic value people would place on controlling marine debris on recreational beaches in New Jersey and North Carolina. A Weibull survival model was estimated treating for and against votes as defining censoring points for an unknown willingness to pay distribution. The findings suggest: (1) people do distinguish situations with differing amounts of debris when they are described using color photographs; (2) the pilot survey implies measures of people's willingness to pay (WTP) for debris control are consistent with a scope test in that larger WTP is associated with programs intended to address situations for more serious background levels of debris; and (3) local beach conditions seem to influence how people interpreted the plans describing beach conditions without the proposed control programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K. J. (1958), 'Utilities, Attitudes and Choices: A Review Note', Econometrica 26 (January), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., R. Solow, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman (1994), 'Comment on NOAA Proposed Rule on Natural Resource Damage Assessments', ANPNM, Comment No. 69, January 7.

  • Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman (1993), 'Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation', Federal Register, January 15 58(10), 4601–4614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, S., S. Cardell, and J. A. Hausman (1981), 'Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars', Journal of Econometrics 16 (September), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, T. A. (1988), 'A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data'. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 (September), 355–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T., W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Ruud, and V. K. Smith with M. Conaway and K. Martin (forthcoming), 'Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel's No-Vote Recommendation', Review of Economics and Statistics (in press).

  • Carson, R. T., W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Ruud, and V. K. Smith (1994), Prospective Interim Lost Use Value Due to DDT and PCB Contamination in the Southern California Bight. Report to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, Ca., September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T., R. C. Mitchell, W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, S. Presser, and P. A. Ruud (1992), A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, Report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska, Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, Ca., November 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C. A., W. P. Gregg, D. V. Richards, and D. A. Manski (1995), Annual Report of National Park Marine Debris Monitoring Program, Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Peter A. and Jerry A. Hausman (1994), 'Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number', Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (Fall), 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M. III (1993), The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1984), 'Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments With Discrete Responses', American Journal of Agriculture Economics 66 (August), 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1994), 'Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation', Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (Fall), 19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979), 'Sample Bias as a Specification Error', Econometrica 47 (January), 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M. (1990), A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, K. E. (1990), 'Models for Referendum Data: The Structure of Discrete Choice Models for Contingent Valuation', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (January), 19–34.

  • McFadden, D. (1974), 'Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior', in P. Zarembka, ed., Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 105–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, D. (1980), 'Partial Observability in Bivariate Probit Models', Journal of Econometrics 12, 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney, P. R. (1994), 'The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care', Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (Fall), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. (1993), 'NonMarket Valuation of Environmental Resources: An Interpretive Appraisal', Land Economics 69 (February), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran (1980), Statistical Methods, 7th edition. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. (1995) Integrating Resource Types, Payment Methods, and Access Conditions to Model Use and Nonuse Values: Valuing Marine Debris Control. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, unpublished Ph.D. thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., V. K. Smith, and R. B. Palmquist (1992a), Marine Debris Focus Group I: Summary Report I. Resource and Environmental Economics Program, North Carolina State University.Unpublished paper, January 27.

  • Zhang, X., V. K. Smith, and R. B. Palmquist (1992b), Marine Debris Focus Group II: Summary Report. Resource and Environmental Economics Program, North Carolina State University.Unpublished paper, January 27.

  • Zhang, X., V. K. Smith, and R. B. Palmquist (1993), Marine Debris Focus Group III: Summary Report.Resource and Environmental Economics Program, North Carolina State University. Unpublished paper, June 17.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, V.K., Zhang, X. & Palmquist, R.B. Marine Debris, Beach Quality, and Non-Market Values. Environmental and Resource Economics 10, 223–247 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026465413899

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026465413899

Navigation