Abstract
This paper traces the application of information theory to philosophical problems of mind and meaning from the earliest days of the creation of the mathematical theory of communication. The use of information theory to understand purposive behavior, learning, pattern recognition, and more marked the beginning of the naturalization of mind and meaning. From the inception of information theory, Wiener, Turing, and others began trying to show how to make a mind from informational and computational materials. Over the last 50 years, many philosophers saw different aspects of the naturalization of the mind, though few saw at once all of the pieces of the puzzle that we now know. Starting with Norbert Wiener himself, philosophers and information theorists used concepts from information theory to understand cognition. This paper provides a window on the historical sequence of contributions made to the overall project of naturalizing the mind by philosophers from Shannon, Wiener, and MacKay, to Dennett, Sayre, Dretske, Fodor, and Perry, among others. At some time between 1928 and 1948, American engineers and mathematicians began to talk about `Theory of Information' and `Information Theory,' understanding by these terms approximately and vaguely a theory for which Hartley's `amount of information' is a basic concept. I have been unable to find out when and by whom these names were first used. Hartley himself does not use them nor does he employ the term `Theory of Transmission of Information,' from which the two other shorter terms presumably were derived. It seems that Norbert Wiener and Claude Shannon were using them in the Mid-Forties.
(Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, 1955)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, F. (1979), ‘A Goal-State Theory of Function Attributions’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46, pp. 498–518.
Adams, F. (1982), Goal-Directed Systems, Ann Arbor: University Microfilms International.
Adams, F. (1986a), ‘Intention and Intentional Action: The Simple View’, Mind & Language 1, pp. 281–301.
Adams, F. (1986b), ‘Feedback About Feedback: Reply to Ehring’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 24, pp. 123–131.
Adams, F. (1989), ‘Tertiary Waywardness Tamed’, Critica 21, pp. 117–125.
Adams, F. (1997), ‘Cognitive Trying', in G. Holmstrom-Hintikka & R. Tuomela, eds., Contemporary Action Theory, Vol. I, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 287–314.
Adams, F., manuscript, Informational Indeterminacy, Invited Commentary on “A Deeper Problem for Dretske's Theory of Information Content” (by Andrea Scarantino, University of Pittsburgh), Society for Philosophy & Psychology, Edmonton, Alberta, June 2002
Adams, F. (2003a), ‘Knowledge', in L. Foridi, ed., The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Information and Computing, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Chapter 7.
Adams, F. (2003b), ‘Thoughts and their Contents: Naturalized Semantics', in Warfield & Stich, eds., The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 143–171.
Adams, F. and Clarke, M., manuscript, Resurrecting the Tracking Theories.
Adams, F. and Enc, B. (1988), ‘Not Quite By Accident’, Dialogue, 27, pp. 287–297.
Adams, F. and Mele, A. (1988), ‘The Role of Intention in Intentional Action’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19, pp. 511–532.
Adams, F. and Mele, A. (1992), ‘The Intention/Volition Debate’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22, pp. 323–338.
Armstrong, D. (1968), A Materialists Theory of the Mind, London: Routledge, & Kegan Paul.
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1955), ‘An Examination of Information Theory’, Philosophy of Science 22, pp. 86–105.
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964), Language and Information, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Barwise, J. (1986), ‘Information and Circumstance’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 27.
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983), Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1985), ‘Shifting Situations and Shaken Attitudes: An Interview with Barwise and Perry’, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, pp. 105–161.
Dennett, D. (1969), Content and Consciousness, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Dennett, D. (1981), Brainstorms, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Dennett, D. (1986), ‘Engineering's Baby’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, pp. 141–142.
Dennett, D. (1987), The Intentional Stance, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Dennett, D. (1994), ‘Self-Portrait', in Guttenplan, S., ed., A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 236–244.
Dretske, F. (1981), Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Dretske, F. (1983), ‘Precis of Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6, pp. 53–56.
Dretske, F. (1985), ‘Constraints and Meaning’, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, pp. 9–12.
Dretske, F. (1986), ‘Misrepresentation', in R. Bogdan, ed., Belief, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dretske, F. (1988), Explaining Behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Dretske, F. (1990), ‘Putting Information to Work', in P. Hanson, ed., Information, Language, and Cognition, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 112–124.
Dretske, F. (1991), ‘Replies', in B. McLaughlin, ed., Dretske and His Critics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dretske, F. (1995), Naturalizing the Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Enc, B. (1979), ‘Function Attributions and Functional Explanations’, Philosophy of Science 46, pp. 343–365.
Enc, B. and Adams, F. (1992), ‘Functions and Goal-Directedness’, Philosophy of Science 59, pp. 635–654 (reprinted in Allen, C., Bekoff, M. and Lauder, G., eds., Nature's Purposes, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford).
Feigenbaum, E. and Feldman, J. 1961: Computers and Thought, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fetzer, J. Forthcoming, ‘Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation'.
Floridi, L. Forthcoming a, ‘Outline of a Theory of Strongly Semantic Information’, Minds and Machines.
Floridi, L. Forthcoming b, ‘Is Semantic Information Meaningful Data?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Fodor, J. (1986), ‘Information and Association’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 27.
Fodor, J. (1987), Psychosemantics, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Fodor, J. (1987), ‘A Situated Grandmother? Some Remarks on Proposals by Barwise and Perry’, Mind and Language 2, pp. 64–81.
Fodor, J. (1990), A Theory of Content and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Fodor, J. (1994), The Elm and the Expert, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Fodor, J. (1998), Concepts, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Gibson, J. (1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Grice, P. (1957), ‘Meaning’, Philosophical Review 66, pp. 377–388.
Hartley, R. (1928), ‘Transmission of Information’, Bell Stystem Technical Journal 7, pp. 535–563.
Hanson, P. (1990), Information, Language, and Cognition, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Lettvin, J., Maturana, H., McCulloch, W. and Pitts, W. (1959), ‘What the Frog's Eye Tells the Frog's Brain’, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 47, pp. 1940–1951.
MacKay, D. (1951), ‘Mindlike Behavior in Artefacts’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (reprinted in Sayre, K. and Crosson, F., eds., The Modeling of Mind, NewYork:Simon & Schuster, 1963).
MacKay, D. (1956), ‘Towards an Information-Flow Model of Human Behaviour’, British Journal of Psychology 43, pp. 30–43.
MacKay, D.M. (1969), Information, Mechanism and Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marr, D. (1982), Vision, New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
McLaughlin, B. (1990), Dretske and his Critics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Nissen, L. (1997), Teleological Language in the Life Sciences, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.
Perry, J. (1990), ‘Individuals in Informational and Intentional Content', in E. Villenueva, ed., Information, Semantics and Epistemology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 172–189.
Perry, J. and Isreal, D. (1990), ‘What is Information?’ in P. Hanson, ed., Information, Language, and Cognition. (Volume 1, Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science), Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Perry, J. and Isreal, D. (1991), ‘Information and Architecture', in J. Barwise, M. Gawron, G. Pltokin and S. Tutiya, eds., Situation Theory and Its Architecture, vol 2, Stanford: Stanford University.
Powers, W. (1973), Behavior: The Control of Perception, London: Wildwood House.
Rosenblueth, A, Wiener, N. and Bigelow, J. (1943), ‘Behavior, Purpose & Teleology’, Philosophy of Science 10, pp. 18–24.
Russell, B. (1921), The Analysis of Mind, London: Allen & Unwin, Ltd.
Sayre, K. and Crosson, F. (1963), The Modeling of Mind: Computers and Intelligence, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Sayre, K. (1965), Recognition, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Sayre, K. (1976), Cybernetics and the Philosophy of Mind, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Sayre, K. (1969), Consciousness, New York: Random House.
Sayre, K. (1986), ‘Intentionality and Information Processing: An Alternative Model for Cognitive Science’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, pp. 121–160.
Sayre, K. (1987), ‘Cognitive Science and the Problem of Semantic Content’, Synthese 70, pp. 247–269.
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Champaign: University of Illinois Press. (Reprint with a new introduction by Weaver, of Shannon's work by the same name in 1948 in the Bell Systems Technical Journal.)
Sober, E. (1985), The Nature of Selection, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Sommerhoff, G. (1974), Logic of the Living Brain, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Stalnaker, R. (1984), Inquiry, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Stampe, D. (1975), ‘Toward a Causal Theory of Linguistic Representation', in P. French et al., eds., Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Turing, A. (1950), ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Mind 59, pp. 433–460.
Tye, M. (1995), Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
Weiner, N. (1948), Cybernetics, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Wooldbridge, D. (1963), The Machinery of the Brain, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Young, P. (1987), The Nature of Information, New York: Praeger Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams, F. The Informational Turn in Philosophy1 . Minds and Machines 13, 471–501 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026244616112
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026244616112