Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of EST- and genomic microsatellite markers for variety discrimination and genetic diversity studies in wheat

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is likely that in the near future sequence information from sequencing programmes and EST libraries will generate an abundance of genic microsatellite markers. This study is focused on the assessment of their likely impact and performance vis-à-vis their genomic counterparts. Microsatellites from two sources were used to assess the genetic diversity in 56 old and new varieties of bread wheat on the UK Recommended List. A set of 12 microsatellite markers generated from genomic libraries and 20 expressed sequence tag (EST)-derived microsatellites were used in the study, and the performance of both marker sets assessed. The EST-derived or genic microsatellites delivered fingerprints of superior quality, amplifying clear products with few stutter bands. Diversity levels as revealed bygenic microsatellites are similar to the few published results. The PIC values for the genic markers were generally lower than those calculated for the genomic microsatellites, though advantages of both marker classes for variety identification applications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.A., G.A. Churchill, J.E. Autrique, S.D. Tanksley & M.E. Sorrells, 1993. Optimising parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36: 181-186.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, G.J., A.J. Collins, P. Stephenson, A. Orry, J.B. Smith & M.D. Gale, 1997. Isolation and characterisation of microsatellites from hexaploid bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 94: 557-563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y.G., T. Ishii, S. Temnykh, X. Chen, L. Lipovich, S.R. Mc-Couch, W.D. Park, N. Ayres & S. Cartinhour, 2000. Diversity of microsatellites derived from genomic libraries and GenBank sequenes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 100: 713-722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donini, P., P. Stephenson, G.J. Bryan & R.M.D. Koebner, 1998. The potential of microsatellites for high throughput genetic diversity assessment in wheat and barley. Gen Res Crop Evol 45: 415-421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donini, P., R.J. Cooke & J.C. Reeves, 2000a. Molecular markers in variety and seed testing. In: J.P. Gustafson (Ed.), Plant Genetic Engineering: Towards the Third Millennium, pp. 27-34. AD Arencibia, Elsevier Science.

  • Donini, P., J.R. Law, R.M.D. Koebner, J.C. Reeves & R.J. Cooke, 2000b. Temporal trends in the diversity of UK wheat. Theor Appl Genet 100: 912-917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eujayl, I., M.E. Sorrells, M. Baum, P. Wolters & W. Powell, 2001. Assessment of genotype variation among cultivated durum wheat based on EST-SSRs and genomic SSRs. Euphytica 119: 39-43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eujayl, I., M.E. Sorrells, M. Baum, P. Wolters & W. Powell, 2002. Isolation of EST-derived microsatellite markers for genotyping the A and B genomes of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 104: 399-407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, R.B., M.D. Bennet, J.B. Smith & D.B. Smith, 1974. Genome size and the proportion of repeated nucleotide sequence DNA in plant. Biochem Genet 12: 257-269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, M.D., S. Chao & P.J. Sharp, 1990. RFLP mapping in wheat: progress and problems. In: Proc 19th Stadler Genet Symp, pp. 353-363. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagyosov, L., I. Kalcheve & V. Chapman, 1993. Construction of libraries enriched for sequence specific repeats. Nucl Acids Res 21: 3911-3912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koebner, R.M.D., W. Powell & P. Donini, 2001. The contribution of current and forthcoming DNA molecular marker technologies to wheat and barley genetics and breeding. In: J. Janick (Ed.), Plant Breeding Reviews, pp. 181-220, Volume 21. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Law, J.R., R.M.D. Koebner, P. Donini, J.C. Reeves & R.J. Cooke, 1998. DNA profiling and plant variety registration. 3: The statistical assessment of distinctness in wheat using amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Euphytica 102: 335-342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgante, M., M. Hanafey & W. Powell, 2002. Microsatellites are preferentially associated with norepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nature Genet 30(2): 194-200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K.D., P. Eggler, G. Seaton, M. Rossetto, E.M. Ablett, L.S. Lee & R.J. Henry, 2000. Analysis of SSRs derived from grape ESTs. Theor Appl Genet 100: 723-726.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Peer, Y. & R. DeWachter, 1994. TREECON for windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the microsoft windows environment. Comput Applic Biosci 10: 569-570.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leigh, F., Lea, V., Law, J. et al. Assessment of EST- and genomic microsatellite markers for variety discrimination and genetic diversity studies in wheat. Euphytica 133, 359–366 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025778227751

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025778227751

Navigation