Skip to main content
Log in

A rejoinder to the comments by Polettini and Stander

  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Dalenius T. 1977. Towards a methodology for statistical disclosure control. Statistisktidskrift 5: 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan G.T. and Lambert D. 1986. Disclosure limited data dissemination. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller W.A. 1993. Masking procedures for microdata disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics 9: 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franconi L. and Stander J. 2003. Spatial and non-spatial model-based protection procedures for the release of business microdata. Statistics and Computing 13: 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polettini S. 2003. Maximum entropy simulation for microdata protection. Statistics and Computing 13: 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarathy R., Muralidhar K., and Parsa R. 2002. Perturbing non-normal confidential variables: The Copula approach. Management Science 48: 1613–1627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trottini M. and Fienberg S.E. 2002. Modeling user uncertainty for disclosure risk and data utility. International Journal of Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10: 511–517.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muralidhar, K., Sarathy, R. A rejoinder to the comments by Polettini and Stander. Statistics and Computing 13, 339–342 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025614806194

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025614806194

Navigation