Skip to main content
Log in

Potential science-technology spillovers in regions: An insight on geographic co-location of knowledge activities in the EU

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article depicts some features of the geography of science and technology outputs in the EU, with a particular attention to regional “co-location” of these two pillars of the “knowledge-based society”. Economists have, for a decade, paid great attention to local “spillovers” stating that industrial firms often draw advantages from the presence of nearby academic centres. The presence in the same areas of strong academic and technological resources is both a condition and a result of science-technology interactions. Concentrating on publications and patents as proxies of the science and technology level in regions, we built a typology of regions according to their commitment to the two knowledge-base activities and then analysed the co-locations of science and technology from several points of view. A fine-grain lattice, mainly based on standard Nuts3 level, was used. Co-location, at the EU level, is not a general rule. A strong potential for spillover/ interaction does exist in the top-class regions which concentrate a high proportion of European S and T output. But for regions with a small/medium level of S&T activity, a divergence of orientations appears between a science-oriented family and a technology-oriented family, indicating an imbalance between local S and T resources. If we look at the S-oriented regions, whilst controlling for underlying factors, such as population and regional economic product, a significant geographic linkage between T and S appears. This suggests a trajectory of science-based technological development. A careful examination of S&T thematic alignments and specialisation is necessary to develop the hypothesis that fostering academic resources could increase the technological power along a growth path.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACS Z. J., AUDRETSCH D. B., FELDMAN M. P. (1994), R&D spillovers and recipient firm size, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (2): 336-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSELIN L., VARGA A., ACS Z. (1997), Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations, Journal of Urban Economics, 42: 442-448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AMABLE B., BARRE R., BOYER R. (1997), Les Systèmes d'innovation à l'ère de la globalisation, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • AUDRETSCH D. B., FELDMAN M. P. (1996), R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, The American Economic Review, 86 (3): 630-640.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARRE R., ESTERLE L. (Eds) (2002), Science & Technologie, Indicateurs 2002, Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARRE R., LAVILLE F., ZITT M. (1997), The dynamics of S&T activities in the EU regions, In: Strategic Analysis for S&T Policy Intelligence, EU (TSER) report.

  • BARRE R., PAILLARD S., CADIOU Y., PETIT S. (2000), Typology and dynamics of the innovation systems, OST, CDIS-TSER WP2, In: Comparative Dynamics of Innovation Systems (CDIS), project 1077, EU-TSER-2 Programme, OST, coord.

  • CLIFF A. D., ORD J. K. (1981), Spatial Processes, Models and Applications, Pion, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • COOKE P. (1998), Introduction. Origins of the concept, In: BRACZYK H. J., COOKE P., HEIDENREICH M. (Eds), Regional Innovation Systems: the Role of Governances in a Globalized World, UCL Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DASGUPTA P., DAVID P. A. (1994), Toward a new economics of science, Research Policy, 23: 487-521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ELQUIST C. (1997), Systems of Innovation, Technologies, Institutions and Organisations, Pinter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • FELDMAN M. P., FLORIDA R. (1994), The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84 (2): 210-229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIBBONS M., LIMOGES C., NOWOTNY H., SCHWARTZMAN S., SCOTT P., TROW M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge, SAGE, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRUPP H., SCHMOCH U. (1999), Patent statistics as economic indicators, Research Policy 28 (4): 377-396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JAFFE A. B. (1989), Real effects of academic research, American Economic Review, 79 (5): 957-970.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAFFE A. B., TRAJTENBERG M., HENDERSON R. (1993), Geographic localisation of knowledge: Spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63 (3): 577-598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUNDVALL B. A. (Ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MADDALA G. S. (1992), Introduction to Econometrics, Prentice-Hall, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NARIN F., HAMILTON K. S., OLIVASTRO D. (1997), The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public research, Research Policy, 26 (3): 317-330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, R. R. (1993), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSI J., BELLON B. (1994), The global interdependence of national innovations systems, Technology in Society, 16: 173-197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PAVITT K. (1985), Patent statistics as indicators of inventive activities: Possibilities and problems, Scientometrics, 7: 77-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHMOOKLER J. (1966), Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press.

  • ZITT M., BARRE R., SIGOGNEAU A., LAVILLE F. (1999), Territorial concentration and evolution of science and technology activities in the European Union: a descriptive analysis, Research Policy, 28 (5): 545-562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZITT M., RAMANANA S. (2000), The dynamics of S&T activities in the EU regions, part C, In: Comparative Dynamics of Innovation Systems (CDIS), project 1077, EU-TSER-2 Programme, OST, coord.

  • ZITT M., RAMANANA S., BASSECOULARD E. (2003), Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation, forthcoming in Scientometrics, 56 (2) 259-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZUCKER L., DARBY M., ARMSTRONG J. (1994), Intellectual Capital and the Firm: The Technology of Geographically Localized Knowledge Spillovers, NBER working paper series 4946, NBER, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., Bassecoulard, E. et al. Potential science-technology spillovers in regions: An insight on geographic co-location of knowledge activities in the EU. Scientometrics 57, 295–320 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024145920210

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024145920210

Keywords

Navigation