Abstract
This study emerged from a consideration of how some beginning primary school teachers cope when faced with teaching science. Primary teachers typically lack science content knowledge and therefore the science pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) that enables them to teach science. Aspects of a group of beginning primary school teachers' science teaching practices were consequently examined in order to understand better the basis of their practice. In particular, science PCK and its relationship to “activities that work” were considered, illuminated by findings about activities that work from a separate study with practicing teachers. The main assertion arising from this study is that activities that work have a close relationship with science PCK. A number of implications for primary science curriculum emerge from this assertion, such as considerations for preservice teacher education science courses and the nature of the primary science curriculum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1992). Constraints to teaching elementary science: A case study of a science enthusiast student. Science Education, 76, 581–595.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education.In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3–44). New York: Macmillan.
Appleton, K. (1977). Is there a fairy godmother in the house? Australian Science Teachers Journal, 23(3), 37–42.
Appleton, K. (1991). Mature-age students – how are they different? Research in Science Education, 21, 1–9.
Appleton, K. (1995). Student teachers' confidence to teach science: Is more science knowledge necessary to improve self-confidence? International Journal of Science Education, 19, 357–369.
Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: Perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32, 393–410.
Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (2002). Beginning elementary teachers' development as teachers of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 43–61.
Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (1998, April). Teaching elementary science: Practices of beginning teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (1999). Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers' practices. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 155–168.
AustralianAcademy of Science. (1994). Primary investigations. Canberra,Australia: Australian Academy of Science.
Australian Foundation for Science. (1991). First steps in science and technology: Focus on science and technology education No 1. Canberra, Australia: Australian Academy of Science.
Australian Science, Technology and Engineering Council. (1997). Foundations for Australia's future: Science and technology in primary schools. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Bell, J., Veal, W. R., & Tippins, D. J. (1998, April ). The evolution of pedagogical content knowledge in prospective secondary physics teachers. Paper presented at the annualmeeting of the NationalAssociation for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
Chan, K. (1998, April). A case study of physicist's conceptions about the theory of evolution. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
Clark, J. M. (2001). A generative model for teacher development in primary science.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
Cochran, K. F., deRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: an integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263–272.
Cochran, K. F., & Holder, K. C. (1998, April). The development of pedagogical content knowing of prospective secondary teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Department of Employment, Education, and Training [DEET]. (1989). Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization.American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207–226.
Ginns, I. S., & Watters, J. J. (1994, April). A longitudinal study of preservice elementary teachers personal and science teaching efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
Grimmett, P., & MacKinnon, A. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. Review of Research in Education, 18, 385–456.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hardy, T., Bearlin, M., & Kirkwood, V. (1990). Outcomes of the primary and early childhood science and technology education project at the University of Canberra. Research in Science Education, 20, 142–151.
Hardy, T., & Kirkwood, V. (1991, July). Challenging and developing teachers' conceptions of science education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Gold Coast, Australia.
Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers' understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 323–337.
Holder, K. C., & Cochran, K. F. (1998, April). The nature of pedagogical content knowing and three mathematics student teachers: It's like pulling teeth.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Hope, J., & Townsend, M. (1983). Student teachers' understanding of science concepts. Research in Science Education, 13, 177–184.
Jane, B., Martin, M., & Tytler, R. (1991). Changing primary teacher trainees' attitudes to science. Research in Science Education, 21, 188–197.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132).Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Mellado, V., Blanco, L. J., & Ruiz, C. (1998). A framework for learning to teach science in initial primary teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9, 195–219.
Miles, E. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morine-Dershimer, G., & Kent, T. (1999). The complex nature and sources of teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 21–50). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Napper, I., & Crawford, G. (1990). Focus folklore: Reflections of focus teachers on the Sci-Tech Inservice Project. Research in Science Education, 20, 230–239.
Osborne, R., & Tasker, R. (1985). Introducing children's ideas to teachers. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in science: The implications of children's science (pp. 136–150). Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
Queensland School CurriculumCouncil. (1999). Science: Initial inservice materials.Brisbane, Australia: Queensland School Curriculum Council.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
Skamp, K. (1989). General science knowledge and attitudes towards science and science teaching of preservice primary teachers: Implications for preservice units. Research in Science Education, 19, 257–267.
Skamp, K. (1997). Student teachers' entry perceptions about teaching primary science: does a first degree make a difference? Research in Science Education, 27, 515–539.
Skamp, K., & Mueller, A. (2001). A longitudinal study of the influences of primary and secondary school, university and practicum on student teachers' images of effective primary science practice. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 227–245.
Smith, D. C. (1999). Changing our teaching: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 163–198).Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1991). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Advances in Research on Teaching, 2, 187–243.
Symington, D. (1974). Why so little primary science? Australian Science Teachers Journal, 20(1), 57–62.
Symington, D. (1980). Elementary school teachers' knowledge of science and its effect on choice between alternative verbal behaviours. Research in Science Education, 10, 69–76.
Symington, D., & Hayes, D. (1989). What do you need to know to teach science in the primary school? Research in Science Education, 19, 278–285.
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.
Varley, P. (1975). Science in the primary school. Brisbane, Australia: Research Branch, Department of Education, Queensland.
Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143–178.
Walsh, M., & Lynch, P. (1985). Educating Rita: Part 2. Any more for science, and if so, why? Research in Science Education, 15, 13–17.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Appleton, K. How Do Beginning Primary School Teachers Cope with Science? Toward an Understanding of Science Teaching Practice. Research in Science Education 33, 1–25 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023666618800
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023666618800