Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Computer-Based Fluency Training on Concept Formation

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study provides a preliminary analysis of how the techniques of fluency training can be combined with systematic concept instruction to improve the learning of complex verbal concepts. Fluency techniques, which require the learner to respond accurately at high rates, have typically focused on definition learning when teaching concepts. Instructional psychologists, however, recommend multiple exemplar training for conceptual instruction. To examine this issue, 41 undergraduate students completed a computer-based instructional module on logical fallacies. Participants were assigned to one of four groups, with the modules for each group differing only in the type of practice provided—either fluency or practice with either examples or definitions. Examination of posttest scores revealed significantly higher scores for participants in the examples groups than those in the definitions groups, but low experimental power prevented a clear conclusion to be drawn about differences between the fluency and practice groups. Implications of results and several methodological issues relevant to this area of research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, R., & Clement, R. (1991). The Great Falls Precision Teaching Project: An historical examination. Journal of Precision Teaching, 8(2), 8-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. C., & Carnine, D. W. (1980). Direct Instruction: An effective approach to educational intervention with the disadvantaged and low performers. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin, (Eds.), Advances in Clinical Child Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 429-473). New York: Plenum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C. (1988). Precision teaching: Measuring and attaining exemplary academic achievement. Youth Policy, 10(7), 12-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C. (1990, September). Closing the confidence gap. Training, pp. 49-56.

  • Binder, C. (1991). Morningside Academy: A private sector laboratory for effective instruction. Future Choices, 3(2), 61-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C. (1993). Behavioral fluency: A new paradigm. Educational Technology, 33(10), 8-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C. & Bloom, C. (1989, February). Fluent product knowledge: Application in the financial services industry. Performance and Instruction, pp. 17-21.

  • Carney, J. D., & Scheer, R. K. (1980). Fundamentals of logic (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. C. (1971). Teaching concepts in the classroom: A set of teaching prescriptions derived from experimental research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 253-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copi, I. M. (1982). Introduction to logic (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, S. (1969). Conceptual learning. Belmont, CA: Fearon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications (Revised ed.). Eugene, OR: ADI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshleman, J. W. (1985). Improvement pictures with low celerations: An early foray into the use of SAFMEDS. Journal of Precision Teaching, 6(3), 54-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. S., & Evans, W. H. (1985). Frequencies that ensure skill competency. Journal of Precision Teaching, 6(2), 25-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning. (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Brown, L. T. (1961). Some factors in the programming of conceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 313-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. S., & Fairweather, P. G. (1998). Computer-based instruction: Design and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W. D. (1991). Thinking critically about New Age ideas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag, S. S., O'Shields, E., & Chase, P. N. (2002). A literature review of empirical studies of rate-building and practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Toronto.

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., & Albin, R. W. (1986). Generalization with precision: The role of negative teaching examples in the instruction of generalized grocery item selection. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11(4), 300-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology. (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, K. W., & Lorson-Howell, K. A. (1990). What's the hurry?: Fluency in the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(3), 20-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. Special Issue: Reflections on B. F. Skinner and psychology. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1475-1490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. (1994). The Morningside model of generative instruction. In R. Gardner, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. W. Eshleman, and T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 173-197). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 281-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. M., & Stratton, R. P. (1966). Evaluation of five methods of teaching concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 48-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koorland, M. A., Keel, M. C., & Ueberhorst, P. (1990). Setting aims for precision learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(3), 64-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korinek, L., & Wolking, B. (1984). Study methods in graduate school. Journal of Precision Teaching, 5(3), 64-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laberge, D., & Samuels, J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, E. (2000). Meaning and argument: An introduction to logic through language. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. (1971). From Skinner to precision teaching: The child knows best. In J. B. Jordan & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let's Try Doing Something Else Kind of Thing (pp. 1-11). Arlington, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, (1990). Precision teaching: Discoveries and effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 51-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. (1996). The four free-operant freedoms. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 199-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, S. M. (1969). Good frames and bad: A grammar of frame writing (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, C. E., & Goggans, L. A. (1993). Computer-based precision learning: Achieving fluency with college students. Education and Treatment of Children, 16(3), 290-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, C. E., & Olander, C. P. (1987, March). Precision management of instructional technology: A program update. Educational Technology, 44-46.

  • McDade, C. E., Rubenstein, S. B., & Olander, C. P. (1983). Parallel between frequency testing and performance on essay questions in a theories of personality course. Journal of Precision Teaching, 4(1), 1-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, C. E., Willanzheimer, L. A., & Olander, C. P. (1981). Precision teaching in a psychological statistics course: Parallels between frequency testing and performance on word problems. Invited paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.

  • McGreevy, P. (1983). Teaching and learning in plain English (2nd ed.). Kansas City, MO: Plain English Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D., Tennyson, R. D., & Posey, L. O. (1992). Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, K. (1998). Effects of celeration rate on behavioral fluency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University.

  • Olander, C. P., Collins, D. L., McArthur, B. L., Watts, R. O., & McDade, C. E. (1986). Retention among college students: A comparison of traditional versus precision teaching. Journal of Precision Teaching, (4), 80-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. A. (2000). Think fast [Computer software]. Victoria, BC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennypacker, H. S., & Binder, C. (1992, January). Triage for American education. Administrative radiology, 18-25.

  • Polson, D. A. (1995). Fostering multiple repertoires in undergraduate behavior analysis students. The Behavior Analyst, 18(2), 293-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, L., Eshleman, J. W., & Cooper, J. O. (1993). Ogden R. Lindsley and the historical development of precision teaching. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 177-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. N. (1986). Practical reasoning in natural language (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiemann, P. W., & Markle, S. M. (1990). Analyzing instructional content: A guide to instruction and evaluation. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada

    Eric J. Fox & Patrick M. Ghezzi

Authors
  1. Eric J. Fox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick M. Ghezzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric J. Fox.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fox, E.J., Ghezzi, P.M. Effects of Computer-Based Fluency Training on Concept Formation. Journal of Behavioral Education 12, 1–21 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022373304577

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022373304577

Search

Navigation