Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23,
Cooper, W. H., & Richardson, A. J. (1986). Unfair comparisons. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71,
Dawes, R. M. (1993). Notes on the sampling of stimulus cases and the measurement of responses in research on juror decision making. In R. Hastie (Ed.), Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making (pp. 225–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1998). Psycholegal research on jury damage awards. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7,
Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgement and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hammond, K. R., Harvey, L. O., & Hastie, R. (1992). Making better use of scientific knowledge: Separating truth from justice. Psychological Science, 3(2), 80–87.
Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hastie, R., & Rasinski, K. A. (1988). The concept of accuracy in social judgment. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 193–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hastie, R., Schkade, D., & Payne, J. (1998). A study of juror and jury judgments in civil cases: Deciding liability for punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 22,
Hastie, R., & Viscusi, K. (1998). What juries can't do well: The jury's role as risk manager. Arizona Law Review, 40, 901–921.
Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118,
Howe, E. S., & Loftus, T. C. (1992). Integration of intention and outcome information by students and circuit court judges: Design economy and individual differences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 102–116.
Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.
Kerr, N., MacCoun, R. J., & Kramer, G. (1996). Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 103,
MacCoun, R. J. (1989). Experimental research on jury decision making. Science, 244, 1046–1050.
MacCoun, R. J. (1993). Inside the black box: What empirical research tells us about decisionmaking by civil juries. In R. E. Litan (Ed.), Verdict: Assessing the civil jury system (pp. 137–180), Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
MacCoun, R. (1998). Biases in the interpretation and use of research results, Annual Review of Psychology, 49,
Priest, G. L., & Klein, B. (1984). The selection of disputes for litigation. Journal of Legal Studies, 13, 1–55.
Scheiner, A. H. (1991). Judicial assessment of punitive damages, the Seventh Amendment, and the politics of jury power. Columbia Law Review, 91, 142–226.
Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vidmar, N. (1999). Juries don't make legal decisions! And other problems: A critique of Hastie et al. on punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, this issue.
Vidmar, N., & Rice, J. L. (1993). Assessments of noneconomic damage awards in medical negligence—A comparison of jurors with legal professionals. Iowa Law Review, 78, 883–911.
Wells, G. L. (1992). Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62,