Skip to main content
Log in

Old and New Results on Multicritical Points

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty years after the Liu–Fisher paper on the bicritical and tetracritical points in quantum lattice gases, these multicritical points continue to appear in a variety of new physical contexts. This paper reviews some recent multicritical phase diagrams, which involve, e.g., high-T c superconductivity and various magnetic phases which may (or may not) coexist with it. One recent example concerns the SO(5) theory, which combines the 3-component antiferromagnetic and the 2-component superconducting order parameters. There, the competition between the isotropic, biconical and decoupled fixed points yields bicritical or tetracritical points. Recalling old results on the subject, it is shown that the decoupled fixed point is stable, implying a tetracritical point, contrary to recent claims, which are critically discussed. Other examples, concerning, e.g., the superconducting versus charge and spin density wave phases are also discussed briefly. In all cases, extensions of old results can be used to correct new claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28:240(1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. E. Fisher and P. Pfeuty, Phys. Rev. B 6:1889(1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. J. Wegner, Phys. Rev. B 6:1891(1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.-S. Liu and M. E. Fisher, J. Low Temp. Phys. 10:655(1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. E. Fisher and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32:1350(1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. R. Nelson, J. M. Kosterlitz, and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33:813(1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Kosterlitz, D. R. Nelson, and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 13:412(1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34:1634(1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Domany, D. R. Nelson, and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 15:3493(1977).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Domany and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 15:3510(1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E.g., L. Néel, Ann. Phys. (Paris) 18:5(1932)

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. NéelC. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 203:304(1936)

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. W. Blazey, H. Rohrer, and R. Webster, Phys. Rev. B 4:2287(1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Aharony, Phys. Rev. B 8:4270(1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. I. Halperin, T. C. Lubensky, and S.-k. Ma, Phys. Rev. Letters 32:292(1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Mukamel and S. Krinsky, Phys. Rev. B 13:5065; 5078 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Aharony, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, C. Domb and M. Green, eds., Vol. 6 (Academic Press, New York, 1976), p. 357. See also other papers in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. D. Bruce and A. Aharony, Phys. Rev. B 11:478(1975).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brézin, J. C. Le Guillou, and J. Zinn-Justin, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, C. Domb and M. Green, eds., Vol. 6 (Academic Press, New York, 1976), p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. J. Wallace and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Lett. 48A:325(1974) and private communication.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Aharony and S. Fishman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37:1587(1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Aharony, R. J. Birgeneau, A. Coniglio, M. A. Kastner, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60:1330(1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. C. Chou, N. R. Belk, M. A. Kastner, R. J. Birgeneau, and A. Aharony, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75:2204(1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Sachidanandam and A. Aharony, Phys. Rev. B 56:2322(1997).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. E. Fisher, Proceedings of the Gibbs Symposium (Yale University, May 1989).

  26. S.-C. Zhang, Science 275:1089(1997).

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. P. Burgess and C. A. Lütken, Phys. Rev. B 57:8642(1998).

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Murakami and N. Nagaosa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69:2395(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.-P. Hu and S.-C. Zhang, M2S conference talk, cond-mat/0005334 (unpublished).

  30. X. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87:057004(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. B 21:3976(1980).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Aharony, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:059703(2002).

    Google Scholar 

  33. K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, Phys. Rep. 12C:78(1974).

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Arrigoni and W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. B 62:11770(2000).

    Google Scholar 

  35. X. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:059704(2002).

    Google Scholar 

  36. E.g., J. Tranquada et al., Nature 375:561(1995)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Y. S. Lee et al., Phys. Rev. B 60:3643(1999)

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Wakimoto et al., Phys. Rev. B 61:3699(2000) and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  39. S. A. Kivelson, G. Aeppli, and V. J. Emery, PNAS 98:11903(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  40. O. Zachar, S. A. Kivelson, and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. B 57:1422(1998).

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. Aharony and A. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70:1874(1993).

    Google Scholar 

  42. For a review, see R. Micnas, J. Ranninger, and S. Robaskiewicz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62:113(1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aharony, A. Old and New Results on Multicritical Points. Journal of Statistical Physics 110, 659–669 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022103717585

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022103717585

Navigation