Abstract
This paper documents that salient features of (time series of annual) citations to scientific publications might be captured by a Bass type diffusion model. This is particularly useful as it allows for a comparison of these features across journals, across disciplines and over time. For the illustrative case of Econometrica 1987, it is found that the peak in citations occurs at 6.5 years, on average. Also, it is found that after 14 years there is only a little gap between cumulative citations and the estimated total cumulative amount, suggesting that on average the impact of these articles lasts for about 15 years or so. Finally, it appears that these features can partly be explained by the size of the articles, as it is found that longer papers get more citations and peak later.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BASS, F. M. (1969), A new-product growth model for consumer durables, Management Science, 15: 215-227.
KLAMER, A., H. P. VAN DALEN (2002), Attention and the art of scientific publishing, Journal of Economic Methodology, to appear.
MAHAJAN, V., E. MULLER, F. M. BASS (1993), New-product diffusion models, In: J. ELIASHBERG, G. L. LILIEN (Eds), Handbook of Marketing, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 349-408.
PARKER, P. M. (1994), Aggregate diffusion forecasting models in marketing: A critical review, International Journal of Forecasting, 10: 353-380.
VAN DALEN, H. P., K. HENKENS (2001), What makes a scientific article influential?, Scientometrics, 50: 455-482.
VAN DEN BULTE, C., G. L. LILIEN (1997), Bias and systematic change in the parameter estimates of macrolevel diffusion models, Marketing Science, 16: 338-353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hans Franses, P. The diffusion of scientific publications: The case of Econometrica, 1987. Scientometrics 56, 29–42 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021994422916
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021994422916