Skip to main content
Log in

Methodological Aspects of the Tolerable Windows Approach

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tolerable windows approach (TWA) allows the climate policyformulation process to be safeguarded in the following way. First,guardrails are defined in order to exclude intolerable climatechange impacts, on the one hand, and unacceptable socioeconomicconsequences of climate change mitigation measures, on the other.Second, a scientific analysis is conducted to investigate thefeatures of those emission paths that are compatible with theguardrail constraints. The fundamental methodology of the TWA isbest described in terms of the theory of differentialinclusions. This emerging mathematical theory already providesnumerical methods applicable as long as the underlying integratedassessment models are of limited complexity. In order to identifyemissions corridors, we propose a novel calculation schemeapplicable also for large-scale integrated assessment models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcamo, J. (ed.): 1994, IMAGE 2.0-Integrated Modeling of Global Climate Change, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo, J. and Kreileman, E.: 1996, ‘Emission Scenarios and Global Climate Protection’, Global Environ. Change 6, 305–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo, J., Leemans, R., and Kreileman, E. (eds.): 1998, Global Change Scenarios of the 21st Century. Results from the IMAGE 2.1 Model, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubin, J.: 1991, Viability Theory, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubin, J. and Cellina, A.: 1984, Differential Inclusions, Springer, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronshtein, I. N. and Semendyayev, K. A.: 1985, Handbook of Mathematics, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A.: 1992, GAMS, A User's Guide, Release 2.25, The Scientific Press, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, T.: 2000, ‘A Generally Applicable Method to Derive Admissible Corridors in the Framework of the Tolerable Windows Approach’, unpublished manuscript, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, T., Hooss, G., Füssel, H.-M., and Hasselmann, K.: 2003, ‘Climate System Modeling in the Framework of the Tolerable Windows Approach: The ICLIPS Climate Model’, Clim. Change, this issue.

  • Bruckner, T., Petschel-Held, G., Toth, F. L., Füssel, H.-M., Helm, C., Leimbach, M., and Schellnhuber, H.-J.: 1999, ‘Climate Change Decision-support and the Tolerable Windows Approach’, Environ. Model. Assess. 4, 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deimling, K.: 1992, Multivalued Differential Equations, De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowlatabadi, H.: 1999, ‘Climate Change Thresholds and Guardrails for Emissions’, Clim. Change 41, 297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, C., Bruckner, T., and Toth, F. L.: 1999, ‘Value Judgments and the Choice of Climate Protection Strategies’, Int. J. Social Econo. 26, 974–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettelingh, J. P., Posch, M., De Smet, P. A.M., and Downing, R. J.: 1995, ‘The Use of Critical Loads in Emission Reduction Agreements in Europe’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 85, 2381–2388.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1996, Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 2001, Climate Change 2001-Synthesis Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreileman, G. J. J. and Berk, M. M.: 1997, The Safe Landing Analysis: Users Manual, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzhanski, A. and Vályi, I.: 1997, Ellipsoidal Calculus for Estimation and Control, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimbach, M. and Bruckner, T.: 2001, ‘Influence of Economic Constraints on the Shape of Emission Corridors’, Computational Econom. 18, 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimbach, M. and Toth, F. L.: 2003, ‘Economic Development and Emission Control over the Longterm: The ICLIPS Aggregated Economic Model’, Clim. Change, this issue.

  • Lempert, R.: 1999, ‘Book Review of F. L. Toth (ed.): Cost-Benefit Analysis of Climate Change: The Broader Perspectives’, Clim. Change 41, 635–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. S., Mendelsohn, R., and Richels, R. G.: 1995, ‘MERGE: A Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policies’, Energy Policy 23, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka, Y., Morita, T., and Kawashima, Y.: 1996, An Estimation of a Negotiable Safe Emissions Corridor Based on the AIM Model, Preliminary study, Discussion paper prepared for The Second Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Geneva, July 8–19, 1996.

  • Morgan, M. G., Kandlikar, M., Risbey, J., and Dowlatabadi, H.: 1999, ‘Why Conventional Tools for Policy Analysis Are Often Inadequate for Problems of Global Change’, Clim. Change 41, 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D.: 1994, Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D.: 2001, ‘Global Warming Economics’, Science 294, 1283–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. and Boyer, J.: 2000, Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. and Yang, Z.: 1996, ‘A Regional Dynamic General-equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate-change Strategies’, Amer. Econ. Rev. 86, 741–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou, M.: 1991, Optimierung, Oldenbourg Verlag, München, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paruccini, M. (ed.): 1994, Applying Multiple Criteria Aid for Decision to Environmental Management, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petschel-Held, G. and Schellnhuber, H.-J.: 1997, ‘The Tolerable Windows Approach to Climate Control: Optimization, Risks, and Perspectives’, in Toth, F. L. (ed.), Cost-Benefit Analysis of Climate Change: The Broader Perspectives, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petschel-Held, G., Schellnhuber, H.-J., Bruckner, T., Toth, F. L., and Hasselmann, K.: 1999, ‘The Tolerable Windows Approach: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations’, Clim. Change 41, 303–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak, E.: 1997, Optimization-Algorithms and Consistent Approximations, Springer, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, H.-J. and Yohe, G.: 1997, ‘Comprehending the Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change by Integrated Assessment’, in Proceedings of the WCRP-Conference, 26–28 August 1997, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Toth, F. L.: 2003, ‘Climate Policy in Light of Climate Science: The ICLIPS Project’, Clim. Change, this issue.

  • Toth, F. L., Bruckner, T., Füssel, H.-M., Leimbach, M., and Petschel-Held, G.: 2003a, ‘Integrated Assessment of Long-term Climate Policies: Part 1-Model Presentation’, Clim. Change, this issue.

  • Toth, F. L., Bruckner, T., Füssel, H.-M., Leimbach, M., and Petschel-Held, G.: 2003b, ‘Integrated Assessment of Long-term Climate Policies: Part 2 — Model Results and Uncertainty Analysis’, Clim. Change, this issue.

  • Toth, F. L., Bruckner, T., Füssel, H.-M., Leimbach, M., Petschel-Held, G., and Schellnhuber, H.-J.: 1997, ‘The Tolerable Windows Approach to Integrated Assessments’, in Cameron, O. K., Fukuwatari, K., and Morita, T. (eds.), Climate Change and Integrated Assessment Models [IAMs]-Bridging the Gaps, Proceedings of the IPCC Asia-Pacific Workshop on Integrated Assessment Models, Center for Global Environmental Research, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 403–430.

  • WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change): 1995, Scenario for the Derivation of Global CO 2 Reduction Targets and Implementation Strategies, WBGU, Bremerhaven, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change): 1996, World in Transition: Ways Towards Global Environmental Solutions, Springer, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change): 1997, Targets for Climate Protection 1997. A Statement for the Third Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Kyoto, WBGU, Bremerhaven, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R., and Edmonds, J. A.: 1996, ‘Economic and Environmental Choices in the Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations’, Nature 379, 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe, G.: 1999, ‘The Tolerable Windows Approach: Lessons and Limitations’, Clim. Change 41, 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yohe, G. and Toth, F. L.: 2000, ‘Adaptation and the Guardrail Approach to Tolerable Climate Change Policy’, Clim. Change 45, 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruckner, T., Petschel-Held, G., Leimbach, M. et al. Methodological Aspects of the Tolerable Windows Approach. Climatic Change 56, 73–89 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021388429866

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021388429866

Keywords

Navigation