Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In Search of Criteria for ‘Fallacies’ and ‘Begging the Question’

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Biro, J.: 1977, ‘Rescuing “Begging the Question”’, Metaphilosophy 8, 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biro, J.: 1984, ‘Knowability, Believability, and Begging the Question: A Reply toSanford’, Metaphilosophy 15, 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. Morris: 1976, With Good Reason: AnIntroduction to Informal Fallacies, New York, St. Martin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelin, Robert J. and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong: 1997, Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic, 5th ed., Harcourt Brace College Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettier, Edmund L.: 1963, ‘Is Justified True BeliefKnowledge?’, Analysis 23, 121–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, Patrick J.: 1999, A Concise Introduction toLogic, 7th ed., Wadsworth Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J.: 1984, ‘Beggingthe Question’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S.: 1843, A Systemof Logic, Longmans Green, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, Lawrence: 1995, ‘The One FallacyTheory’, Informal Logic 17(2), 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D.: 1972, ‘Begging theQuestion’, Analysis 32, 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D.: 1981, ‘Superfluous Information,Epistemic Conditions of Inference, and Begging the Question’, Metaphilosophy 12, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D.: 1988, ‘Begging the Question as Involving Actual Belief and Inconceivable WithoutIt’, Metaphilosophy 19, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnot-Armstrong, Walter: 1999, ‘Begging theQuestion’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77(2), 174–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, Frans H. andRon Grootendorst: 1987, ‘Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective’, Argumentation 1, 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1991, Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic ofArgumentation, Greenwood Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N.: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy,University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, John and Douglas Walton: 1989, Fallacies:Selected Papers 1972–1982, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Kent State University, P.O. Box 5190, Kent, Ohio, 44242-0001, USA

    Polycarp Ikeunobe

Authors
  1. Polycarp Ikeunobe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ikeunobe, P. In Search of Criteria for ‘Fallacies’ and ‘Begging the Question’. Argumentation 16, 421–441 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021158632437

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021158632437

Search

Navigation