Abstract
While many have suggested that to withdraw medical interventions is ethically equivalent to withholding them, the moral complexity of actually withdrawing life supportive interventions from a patient cannot be ignored. Utilizing interplay between expository and narrative styles, and drawing upon our experiences with patients, families, nurses, and physicians when life supports have been withdrawn, we explore the changeable character of “boundaries” in end-of-life situations. We consider ways in which boundaries imply differences – for example, between cognition and performance – and how the encounter with boundaries can generate altered meanings important for understanding decisions and actions in these contexts. We conclude that the reliance on mere roles to support the moral weight of withdrawing medical interventions is inadequate. Roles that lead us to such moments are exceeded by the responsibility encountered in such moments. And here, we suggest, is the momentous character of withdrawal: it presents the grave astonishment, the trembling awe, in the “not-being-there” of the other in death.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aulisio MP, Arnold RM, Youngner SJ, eds. Special issue: Commentary on the ASBH core competencies for health care ethics consultation. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 1999; 10: 3–49.
Bliton MJ, Finder SG. The eclipse of the individual in policy (Where is the place for justice?) Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1996; 5: 519–532.
Bliton MJ, Finder SG. Strange, but not stranger: The peculiar visage of philosophy in clinical ethics consultation. In: Zaner RM, ed. Performance, Talk, Reflection: What is Going on in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999: 69–97.
Campbell ML, Bizek KS, Stewart R. Integrating technology with compassionate care: Withdrawal of ventilation in a conscious patient with apnea. American Journal of Critical Care 1998; 7: 85–89.
Cherny NI. Commentary: Sedation in response to refractory existential distress: Walking the fine line. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1998; 16: 404–405.
Churchill LR. Are we professionals? A critical look at the social role of bioethicists. Daedalus 1999; 128: 253–274.
The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Decisions near the end of life. Journal of the American Medical Association 1992; 267: 2229–2233.
Derrida J. The Gift of Death, D. Wills (trans.), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Devettere RJ. Reconceptualizing the euthanasia debate. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Health Care 1989; 17: 145–155.
Edwards MJ, Tolle SW. Disconnecting a ventilator at the request of a patient who knows he will then die: The doctor's anguish. Annals of Internal Medicine 1992; 117: 254–256.
Fox E, Stocking C. Ethics consultant's recommendations for life-prolonging treatment of patients in a persistent vegetative state. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993; 270: 2578–2582.
The Hastings Center. Guidelines on the Termination of Life-Sustaining Treatment and the Care of the Dying. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1987.
Howe EG. Ethics consultants: Could they do better? The Journal of Clinical Ethics 1999; 10: 13–25.
Husserl E. Formal and Transcendental Logic, D. Cairns (trans.). Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague, 1969.
Jonas H. The blessing and burden of mortality. Hastings Center Report 1992; 22: 34–40.
Jecker NS, Emanuel L. Are acting and omitting morally equivalent? A reappraisal. Journal of American Geriatric Society 1995; 43: 696–701.
President's Commission for the study of ethical problems in medicine and biomedical and behavioral research. Deciding to Forgo Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983.
Quill TE. The ambiguity of clinical intentions. The New England Journal of Medicine 1993; 329: 1039–1040.
Rosen EJ. Commentary: A case of Terminal Sedation in the family. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1998; 16: 406–407.
Scott CE. Responsibility with memory. Research in Phenomenology 2000; XXX: 240–251.
Shaivoa L. Case presentation: Terminal sedation and existential distress. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1998; 16: 403–404.
Solomon MZ, et al. Decisions near the end of life: Professional views on lifesustaining treatments. American Journal of Public Health 1993; 83: 14–23.
Special Section. Euthanasia and public policy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1998; 7: 339–401.
Spiegelburg H. Putting ourselves into the place of others: Towards a phenomenology of imaginary self transposal. Human Studies 1980; 3: 169–173.
Tolle SW, Girard DE. The physician's role in the events surrounding death. Archives of Internal Medicine 1983; 143: 1447–1449.
Weir RF. Options among ethicists. Chapter 6 in his Abating Treatment with Critically Ill Patients: Ethical and Legal Limits in the Medical Prolongation of Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989: 214–289.
Zaner RM. Ethics and the Clinical Encounter. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.
Zaner RM. Troubled Voices: Stories of ethics and illness. Cleveland, OH: The Pilgrim Press, 1993.
Zaner RM. Listening or telling? Thoughts on responsibility in clinical ethics consultation. Theoretical Medicine 1996; 17: 255–277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bliton, M.J., Finder, S.G. Traversing Boundaries: Clinical Ethics, Moral Experience, and the Withdrawal of Life Supports. Theor Med Bioeth 23, 233–258 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020855610647
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020855610647