Skip to main content
Log in

Decoherence and Wavefunction Collapse in Quantum Measurements

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Examining the notion of wavefunction collapse (WFC) in quantum measurements, which came again to be in question in the recent debate on the quantum Zeno effect, we remark that WFC is realized only through decoherence among branch waves by detection, after a spectral decomposition process from an initial object wavefunction to a superposition of branch waves corresponding to relevant measurement propositions. We improve the definition of the decoherence parameter, so as to be fitted to general cases, by which we can quantitatively estimate the degree of WFC given by detectors. Finally, we briefly discuss whether two special detector models, with very huge and very small degrees of freedom, can provoke WFC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. For example, see J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantum Mechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932). [English translation: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, E. T. Beyer, trans. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1955) ].

    Google Scholar 

  2. Also see M. Namiki, S. Pascazio, and H. Nakazato, Decoherence and Quantum Measurements (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. There are many earlier papers, by L. A. Khalfin, B. Misra, E. C. G. Sudarshan, and others, on the quantum Zeno effect. See Ref. 2 and a review article by D. Home and M. A. P. Whitaker, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 258, 237 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. J. Cook, Phys. Scripta T21, 49 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2295 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Machida and M. Namiki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 63, 1457, 1833 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Pertrosky, S. Tasaki, and I. Prigogine, Phys. Lett. A 151, 109 (1990); Physica A 170, 306 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Inagaki, M. Namiki, and T. Tajiri, Phys. Lett. A 166, 5 (1992). As for observation of the quantum Zeno effect making use of neutron beams, see the papers by H. Rauch, M. Namiki, S. Pascazio, H. Nakazato, and others. Also, refer to Ref. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Rauch, personal communication.

  10. H. Kaiser, R. Clothier, S. A. Werner, H. Rauch, and H. Wölwitsh, Phys. Rev. A 45, 31 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Nakazato, M. Namiki, S. Pascazio, and Y. Yamanaka, Phys. Lett. A 222, 130 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Namiki, M. Decoherence and Wavefunction Collapse in Quantum Measurements. Foundations of Physics 29, 457–464 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018827217752

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018827217752

Keywords

Navigation