REFERENCES
Matilal, B. K. (1986). Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matilal, B. K. (1995). “A Realist View of Perception,” in P. K. Sen and R. R. Verma (eds.), The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research, pp. 305–326.
Nyāyasūtra (Nyāyadarśanam) (1985). With four commentaries, the Nyāyasūtra-bhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)ya of Vātsyāyana, the Nyāyasūtra-vārttika of Uddyotakara, the Nyāyasūtravārttika-tātpāryatīkā of Vācaspati Miśra, and the Vrtti of Viśvanātha. Ed. A. M. Tarkatirtha, Taranatha Nyayatarkatirtha, and H. K. Tarkatirtha. Calcutta Sanskrit Series 18. 1936–1944. Reprint, New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
Phillips, Stephen H. (1995). Classical Indian Metaphysics. Chicago: Open Court.
Phillips, Stephen H. (January 1987). “Padmapāda's Illusion Argument,” Philosophy East and West 37(1): 3–23.
Pollock, John (1986). Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.
Potter Karl H. and Sibajiban Bhattacharyya, eds. (1993). Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Vol. 6. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Ramanuja Tatacharya, N. S. (1992). Pratyak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)atattvacintāma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)i Vimarśa: A Comprehensive and Evaluative Study of the Pratyak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)akha\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d} \)a of the Tattvacintāma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)i. Tirupati: Rastriya Samskrita Vidyapitha.
(TCM) Tattvacintāma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)i of Ga\(\dot n\)geśa, vol. 1. pratyak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)a-kha\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d} \)a. With the Prakāśa commentary by Rucidatta Miśra and a subcommentary by Rāmak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)ādhvarin. Ed. N. S. Ramanuja Tatacharya. Kendriya Sanskrit Vidypeetha Series 20. Tirupati: 1972.
Tattvacintāma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)i of Ga\(\dot n\)geśa, vol. 2, anumāna-kha\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d} \)a. With the Prakāśa commentary by Rucidatta Miśra and a subcommentary by Dharmarājādhvarin. Ed. N. S. Ramanuja Tatacharya. Kendriya Sanskrit Vidypeetha Series 33, Tirupati: 1982.
Tattvacintāma\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)i of Ga\(\dot n\)geśa, vol. 1, pratyak\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \)a-kha\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n} \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d} \)a. With the Māthurī commentary of Mathurānātha. Ed. Kamakhyanath Tarkavagish. Asiatic Society. Calcutta, 1884–1901. Reprint, 1991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phillips, S.H., Tatacharya, N.R. Discourse on Perceptual Presentation of Something as Other Than What It Is. Journal of Indian Philosophy 28, 567–650 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017557514810
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017557514810