Abstract
In the recent U.K. decision of White v.White, the House of Lords clarified thelaw to be applied in applications under s. 25of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Itconfirmed that the overriding goal of the courtin such cases was to achieve fairness, but,crucially, it articulated a view of fairnesswhich took equality and non-discrimination asstarting points. On this view, the courtchallenged historically gendered assumptions offairness, contribution to the family welfare,and the value of different kinds of work. Whilethe decision has far-reaching potential toachieve a form of substantive equality forwomen in cases of divorce, there is a dangerthat it may be confined to those cases, andissues of family finances will continue toappear unrelated to broader state policies.
REFERENCES
Ancillary Relief Advisory Group, Report to the Lord Chancellor (London: Lord Chancellor’s Department, 1998).
Diduck, A., “Dividing the Family Assets”, in Undercurrents of Divorce, ed. S. Day Sclater and C. Piper (Aldershot: Dartmouth, Ashgate, 1999), 209–230.
Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F., Family Law, State and Gender. Text, Cases and Materials (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).
Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M. and Beinart, S., Family Lawyers (Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2000).
Davis, G., Cretney, S. and Collins, J., Simple Quarrels: Negotiating Money and Property Disputes on Divorce (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
Gray, C. and Merrick, S.B., “Voice Alterations, Why Women Have More Difficulty Than Men with the Legal Process of Divorce”, Family and Conciliation Courts Review 34/2 (1996), 240.
Home Office, Supporting Families: A Consultation Document (London: Home Office, 1998).
Ingleby, R., Solicitors and Divorce (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).
Pahl, J., Money and Marriage (Basingstoke and London: MacMillan, 1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diduck, A. Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 F.L.R. 981. Feminist Legal Studies 9, 173–183 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016744705288
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016744705288