Skip to main content
Log in

Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 F.L.R. 981

  • Legislation
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the recent U.K. decision of White v.White, the House of Lords clarified thelaw to be applied in applications under s. 25of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Itconfirmed that the overriding goal of the courtin such cases was to achieve fairness, but,crucially, it articulated a view of fairnesswhich took equality and non-discrimination asstarting points. On this view, the courtchallenged historically gendered assumptions offairness, contribution to the family welfare,and the value of different kinds of work. Whilethe decision has far-reaching potential toachieve a form of substantive equality forwomen in cases of divorce, there is a dangerthat it may be confined to those cases, andissues of family finances will continue toappear unrelated to broader state policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Ancillary Relief Advisory Group, Report to the Lord Chancellor (London: Lord Chancellor’s Department, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diduck, A., “Dividing the Family Assets”, in Undercurrents of Divorce, ed. S. Day Sclater and C. Piper (Aldershot: Dartmouth, Ashgate, 1999), 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diduck, A. and Kaganas, F., Family Law, State and Gender. Text, Cases and Materials (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M. and Beinart, S., Family Lawyers (Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., Cretney, S. and Collins, J., Simple Quarrels: Negotiating Money and Property Disputes on Divorce (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. and Merrick, S.B., “Voice Alterations, Why Women Have More Difficulty Than Men with the Legal Process of Divorce”, Family and Conciliation Courts Review 34/2 (1996), 240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office, Supporting Families: A Consultation Document (London: Home Office, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby, R., Solicitors and Divorce (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, J., Money and Marriage (Basingstoke and London: MacMillan, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diduck, A. Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 F.L.R. 981. Feminist Legal Studies 9, 173–183 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016744705288

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016744705288

Navigation