The Colored, Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM): A Conceptual Approach and Tool for Genetic Counseling Research
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The Colored Ecological and Genetic Relational Map (CEGRM) [pronounced see-gram] is a conceptual approach and tool for presenting information about family and nonkin relationships and stories about inherited diseases in a simple, understandable form. It combines information that can be derived from pedigrees, genograms, ecomaps, and social network analysis in a single, or series of, pictorial maps based on colors and shapes. The CEGRM is based on a social systems perspective, particularly emphasizing social exchange and resource theories. The CEGRM should be particularly useful in genetic counseling research with members of suspected cancer-risk families or families with other late-onset inherited diseases. A genetic counseling client comes with a social history and context as well as a genetic one. Client decision-making in terms of reproductive plans, therapeutic intervention, lifestyle behavior and sharing or withholding of genetic information frequently becomes enmeshed with preexisting psycho-social relationships among biological kin, affinal kin (in-laws) and fictive kin (friends who act as family). The CEGRM makes it easier to compare different types of social interactions between the client and his/her significant others and among family members on the same dimensions.
- Beauchesne M, Kelley B, Gauthier MA (1997) The genogram: A health assessment tool. Nurse Educator 22(3):9,16.
- Bennett RL, Steinhaus KA, Uhrich SB, O'sullivan CK, Resta RG, Lochner-Doyle D, Markel DS, Vincent V, Mamanishi J (1995) Recommendations for standardized pedigree nomenclature. Am J Human Genet 56:745–52.
- Blau P (1986) Exchange and Power in Social Life. rev. edn. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
- Bowen DJ, Patenaude AF, Vernon SW (1999) Psychosocial issues in cancer genetics: From the laboratory to the public. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:326–328.
- Codori A-M, Petersen GM, Miglioretti DL, Larkin DL, Bushey MT, Young C, Brensinger JD, Johnson K, Bacon JA, Booker SV (1999) Attitudes toward colon cancer gene testing: Factors predicting test uptake. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:345–351.
- Croyle RT, Lerman C (1993) Interest in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: Cognitive and emotional correlates. Preventive Med 22:284–292.
- Daly M, Farmer J, Farmer J, Harrop-Stein C, Montgomery S, Itzen M, Costalis JW, Rogatko A, Miller S, Balshem A, Gillespie D (1999) Exploring family relationships in cancer risk counseling using the genogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8: 393–398.
- Eeles R (1996) Testing for the breast cancer predisposition gene. BRCA1. Br Med J 313:572–3.
- Eunpu DL (1997) Systematically-based psychotherapeutic techniques in genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel 6:1–20.
- Eunpu DL (1999) The family belief and attitude history: An aid to decision making and coping in genetic counseling. Am J Human Genet 65( Supplement):A13.
- Foa UG, Converse, Jr. J, Tornblom KY, Foa EB (1993) Resource Theory: Explorations and Applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Foa UG, Foa EB (1974) Social Structures of the Mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
- Friedman EH (1991) Bowen theory and therapy. In: Gurman A and Kniskern D (eds) Handbook of Family Therapy, Vol 2. New York: Brunner/Mazel, pp134–170.
- Geller G, Doksum T, Bernhardt BA, Metz SA (1999) Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: Influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:377–383.
- Geller G, Tambor ES, Bernhardt VA, Wissow LS, Fraser G (2000) Mothers and daughters from breast cancer families: A qualitative study of their perceptions of risks and benefits associated with minor's participation in genetic susceptibility research. J Am Med Womens Assoc 55: 280–284.
- Glanz K, Grove J, Lerman C, Gotay C, LeMarchand L (1999) Correlates of intentions to obtain genetic counseling and colorectal cancer gene testing among at-risk relatives from three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:329–336.
- Green JM, Richards MPM, Murton F, Stratham H, Hallowell N (1997) Family communication and genetic counseling: The case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Genet Counsel 6:45–60.
- Hallowell N, Richards MPM (1997) Understanding life's lottery: An evaluation of studies of genetic risk awareness. J Health Psychol 2:149–159.
- Hamann HA, Croyle RT, Venne VL, Baty BJ, Smith KR, Botkin JR (2000) Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation. Am J Med Genet 92:25–32.
- Hartman A (1995) Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. The J Contemp Human Serv Feb:111–122.
- Homans G C (1974) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Kenen R, Eeles R, Ardern-Jones A, Mitchell R (2001) Family stories, communication patterns and the use of heuristics in familial cancer families: An exploratory, qualitative research study. ELSI 10th Anniversary Celebration Conference, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 17 Jan 2001.
- Kenen R, Smith ACM (1995) Genetic counseling for the next 25 years: Models for the future. J Genet Counsel 4:115–124.
- Kenen R, Smith ACM, Watkins C, Zuber-Pittore (2000) To use or not to use: Male partners' perspectives on decision making about prenatal diagnosis. J Genet Counsel 9:33–45.
- Kessler S, Levine EK (1987) Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IV. The subjective assessment of probability. Am J Med Genet 28:361–370.
- Kuehl B (1995) The solution-oriented genogram: A collaborative approach. J Marit Fam Ther 21:239–250.
- Lerman C, Narod S, Schulman K, Hughes C, Gomez-Caminero A, Bonney G, Gold K, Trock B, Main D, Lynch J, Fulmore C, Synder C, Lemon SJ, Conway T, Tonin P, Lenoir G, Lynch H (1996) BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. J Am Med Assoc 275:1885–1892.
- Lewis KG (1989) The use of color-coded genograms in family therapy. J Marit Fam Ther 15:169–176.
- Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979) Genetic counseling: Provision and reception of Information. Am J Med Genet 3:113–127.
- McGoldrick M, Gerson R (1985) Genograms in Family Assessment. New York: Norton.
- McGoldrick M, Gerson R, Shellenberger S (1999) Genograms: Assessment and Intervention, 2nd edn. New York: Norton.
- Parsons EP, Atkinson P (1992) Lay constructions of genetic risk. Sociol Health Illness 14:437–455.
- Peters JA (1994) Familial cancer risk: Part II. Breast cancer risk counseling and genetic susceptibility testing. J Oncol Manag 3:14–22.
- Peters JA, Djurdjinovic L, Baker D (1999) The genetic self: The Human Genome Project, genetic counseling, and family therapy. Fam Syst Health 17:5–24.
- Resta R (1993) The crane's foot: The rise of the pedigree in human genetics. J Genet Counsel 2:235–260.
- Richards M (1996) Families, kinship and genetics. In: Marteau T and Richards M (eds) The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Richards MPH (2000) Children's understanding of inheritance and family. Child Psychol Psychiatry Rev 5:2–7.
- Roberts LW, Battaglia J, Smithpeter M, Epstein RS (1999) An office on main street: Health care dilemmas in small communities. Hastings Center Rep 29:28–37.
- Rolland JS (1994) Families, Illness, & Disability. New York: Wiley-Liss.
- Roloff ME (1981) Interpersonal Communication: The Social Exchange Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Schneider KA, Marnane D (1997) Cancer risk counseling: How is it different? J Genet Counsel 6:97–110.
- Sherman R (2000) The Intimacy genogram. In: Watts RE et al. (eds) Techniques in Marriage and Family Counseling, Vol. 1. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
- Shiloh S (1996) Decision-making in the context of genetic risk. In Marteau T and Richards M (eds) The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp 82–103.
- Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR (1999) Moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:385–392.
- Stack CB (1974) All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community. New York: Harper & Row.
- Stark R (1997) Sociology, 7th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Turner J (1998) The Structure of Sociological Theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Watson M, Duvivier V, Wade W, Walsh M, Ashley S, Davidson J, Papaikonomou M, Murday V, Sacks N, Eeles R (1998) Family history of breast cancer: What do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? J Med Genet 35:731–738.
- The Colored, Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM): A Conceptual Approach and Tool for Genetic Counseling Research
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Volume 10, Issue 4 , pp 289-309
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- cancer genetics
- late-onset genetic disorders
- genetic counseling
- social network analysis
- family relationships
- nonkin relationships
- Industry Sectors