Skip to main content
Log in

Occupational Transitions and Corporate Responsibility in Layoffs: A European Research Project (SOCOSE)

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most prominent aspects of the present labour markets is an increase in occupational transitions. Employees experience insecurity to a much larger degree than ever before. Under these circumstances, the questions of blame and responsibility – for job-loss or unemployment –, so far much too readily focused on the individual, have to be re-considered. Transitions will also have to be framed by company based or labour administration interventions.

This situation forms the entrance to the scientific evaluation that is central to the SOCOSE project. It aims at the formulation of an integrated European model for outplacement/replacement counselling. Thus, transparency will be added to the process of dismissal from the perspective of the individual employees, and they are assisted in re-entering the labour market at an early stage. This form of guidance will prevent long-term unemployment or might else prevent unemployment completely.

The SOCOSE project started with a European comparison of existing outplacement interventions. The main focus, however, is the perspective of the individual that has been dismissed or is facing possible dismissal and his or her evaluation of this process. Crucial to this evaluation is the aspect of justice or fairness.

First Results of this comparison across countries are presented, and the ongoing empirical studies are outlined on the basis of an exemplary case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brockner, J. and J. Greenberg: 1990, ‘The Impact of Layoffs on Survivors: An Organisational Justice Perspective’, in J. S. Carroll (ed.), Applied Social Psychology and Organisational Settings(Erlbaum, Hillsdale), pp. 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R. and J. Greenberg: 1997, ‘Progress in Organisational Justice: Tunneling Through the Maze’, in C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology(John Wiley & Sons, New York), pp. 317–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M.: 1985, Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective(Yale University Press, New Haven, GT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M.: 1997, ‘Dynamic Self-Reliance: An Important Concept for Work and Organisational Psychology in the 21st Century’, in C. L. Cooper and S. E. Jackson (eds.), Creating Tomorrow's Organisations: A Handbook for Future Research in Organisational Behavior(Wiley, Chichester), pp. 399–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazier, B.: 1998, Employability.Final Report of a DG Research Project of the European Commission(WZB, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuven, E., A. Bakker and W. Schaufeli: 2001, National Report for Workpackage 1 of the SOCOSE project, Unpublished Report, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands.

  • Kieselbach, T. (ed.): 1997, ‘Job loss, Unemployment and Injustices (Special Issue)’, Social Justice Research 10(2), 111–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieselbach, T.: 1998, ‘Unemployment and Experienced Injustices: The Social Responsibility of the Organisation for Cushioning the Process of Downsizing’, in H. Lange, A. Löhr and H. Steinmann (eds.), Working Across Cultures: Ethical Perspectives for Intercultural Management(Issues in Business Ethics, vol. 9) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), pp. 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieselbach, T. and F. Klink: 1997, ‘Interventionen bei Arbeitsplatzverlust und Arbeitslosigkeit (Interventions at job loss and unemployment)’, in L. v. Rosenstiel, G. M. Hockel and W. Molt (eds.), Handbuch der angewandten Psychologie(Handbook of Applied Psychology) (Ecomed, Munich, Germany), pp. V-6.4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A. and J. Brockner: 1993, ‘Managing Victim and Survivor Layoff Reactions: A Procedural Justice Perspective’, in R. Cropanzano (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A. and R. Folger: 1991, ‘The Effects of Procedures, Social Accounts, and Benefits Level on Victims' Layoff Reactions’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21, 630–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, G. and J. Rodgers (eds.): 1989, Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe(International Institute for Labour Studies, Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, B.: 1995, ‘Gerechtigkeitstheorie und empirische Gerechtigkeitsforschung’ [Justice Theory and Empirical Justice Research], in H.-P. Müller and B. Wegener (eds.), Soziale Ungleichheit und Soziale Gerechtigkeit[Social Inequality and Social Justice] (Campus, Frankfurt/M, Germany), pp. 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kieselbach, T., Mader, S. Occupational Transitions and Corporate Responsibility in Layoffs: A European Research Project (SOCOSE). Journal of Business Ethics 39, 13–20 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016315530823

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016315530823

Navigation