Is Hintikka's Logic First-Order?
- Matti EklundAffiliated withHugvísindastofnun, University of Iceland
- , Daniel KolakAffiliated withDepartment of Philosophy, William Paterson University
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Jaakko Hintikka has argued that ordinary first-order logic should be replaced byindependence-friendly first-order logic, where essentially branching quantificationcan be represented. One recurring criticism of Hintikka has been that Hintikka'ssupposedly new logic is equivalent to a system of second-order logic, and henceis neither novel nor first-order. A standard reply to this criticism by Hintikka andhis defenders has been to show that given game-theoretic semantics, Hintikka'sbranching quantifiers receive the exact same treatment as the regular first-orderones. We develop a different reply, based around considerations concerning thenature of logic. In particular, we argue that Hintikka's logic is the logic that bestrepresents the language fragment standard first-order logic is meantto represent. Therefore it earns its keep, and is also properly regarded as first-order.
- Is Hintikka's Logic First-Order?
Volume 131, Issue 3 , pp 371-388
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors