Abstract
This paper aims to relax the tension between the political requirements of making peace and the moral demands of doing justice, in light of the ‘peace processes’ in South Africa and Northern Ireland. It begins by arguing that criminal justice should be reconceived as consisting primarily in the vindication of victims, both direct and indirect. This is not to deny the retributive punishment of perpetrators any role at all, only to insist that it be largely subservient to the goal of vindication. Why should we take such an account of justice to be true? The paper offers two reasons. First, Christians – and even secularist liberals – have a prima facie reason in the consonance of this account with the Bible's eudaimonistic conception of justice as ordered to the restoration of healthy community. Second, since all concepts of criminal justice share the basic notion of putting right what is wrong, it would be odd if the repair of damage done to victims (i.e., their ‘vindication’) were not prominent among its concerns; and there are reasons to suppose that this vindication should actually predominate in relation to the other principles of justice (the retributive ‘balancing’ of crime and punishment, and the reform of the criminal for his own sake). In its final sections, the paper applies the proposed conception of criminal justice to the ‘peace processes’ in South Africa and Northern Ireland, and concludes that in both cases, notwithstanding concessions to the politics of peace-making, considerable justice has been done.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Achtemeier, E.R., Righteousness in the Old Testament, in G.A. Buttrick (ed.), The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, vol. 4. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1962, pp. 80–85.
Achtemeier, P.J., Righteousness in the New Testament, in G.A. Buttrick (ed.), The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, vol. 4. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1962, pp. 91–99.
Asmal, K., Asmal, L., and Roberts, R.S., Reconciliation through Truth: a Reckoning of Apartheid's Criminal Governance. Oxford: James Currey; New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997.
Biggar, N. (ed.), Making Peace or Doing Justice: Must We Choose?, Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice after Civil Conflict. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2001, pp. 6–22.
Biggar, N., Justice Reconceived and (Somewhat) Reconciled with the Politics of Peace, in Jahresbericht/Annual 2000, Århus: Societas Ethica, 2001, pp. 141–148.
Dorfmann, A., Death and the Maiden. London: Nick Hern Books, 1991.
Essays on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. South African Embassy Information Series No. 4. The Hague: Embassy of South Africa, April 1998.
Finnis, J., Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.
Forrester, D., Justice, in A. Hastings, A. Mason and H. Pyper (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 360–362.
O'Connor, F., In Search of a State: Catholics in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Blackstaff Press, 1993.
Oficina de Derechos Humanos del Arzobispado de Guatemala (ODHAG), Guatemala: Nunca Más, 4 vols. Guatemala: ODHAG, 1998; published in English as REMHI/ODHAG, Guatemala: Never Again!. London: Catholic Institute for International Relations and Latin American Bureau, 1999.
Taylor, P., Provos: the IRA and Sinn Fein. London: Bloomsbury, 1997.
Villa-Vicencio, C., A Different Kind of Justice: the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Contemporary Justice Review (December 1998).
Walker, N., Why Punish?. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Werpehowski, W., Justice, in J.F. Childress and J. Macquarrie (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Ethics, London: SCM Press, 1986, pp. 329–332.
Wolterstorff, N., Justice and Peace, in D.J. Atkinson and D.H. Field (eds.), The New Dictionary of Christian Ethics and Pastoral Theology. Leicester: IVP, 1995, p. 15–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biggar, N. Peace and Justice: A Limited Reconciliation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5, 167–179 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016080506795
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016080506795