Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the growth of world social science literature

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objectives of this study are: (a) to find the applicability of selected growth models to the growth of publications in six sub-disciplines of social sciences, namely anthropology, economics, history, political science, psychology, and sociology in the world; and (b) to verify the criteria for selecting the most appropriate growth model suggested by Eggheand Rao (1992).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Egghe, L., Ravichandra Rao, I. K., Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications. Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 5-46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Price, D. De Solla. Science since Babylon. Enlarged edition. New Haven; Yale University Press. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Price, D. De Solla, Little Science, Big Science. New York; Columbia University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wolfram, D., Chu, C. M., Lu, X., Growth of knowledge: Bibliometric analysis using online database data. In: L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds), Informetrics, 89/90, Amsterdam; Elsevier, 1990, pp. 355-372.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, B., Kumar, S., Sangam, S.L. et al. Modeling the growth of world social science literature. Scientometrics 53, 161–164 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014844222898

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014844222898

Keywords

Navigation