Abstract
The main objectives of this study are: (a) to find the applicability of selected growth models to the growth of publications in six sub-disciplines of social sciences, namely anthropology, economics, history, political science, psychology, and sociology in the world; and (b) to verify the criteria for selecting the most appropriate growth model suggested by Eggheand Rao (1992).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Egghe, L., Ravichandra Rao, I. K., Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications. Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 5-46.
Price, D. De Solla. Science since Babylon. Enlarged edition. New Haven; Yale University Press. 1975.
Price, D. De Solla, Little Science, Big Science. New York; Columbia University Press, 1966.
Wolfram, D., Chu, C. M., Lu, X., Growth of knowledge: Bibliometric analysis using online database data. In: L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds), Informetrics, 89/90, Amsterdam; Elsevier, 1990, pp. 355-372.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, B., Kumar, S., Sangam, S.L. et al. Modeling the growth of world social science literature. Scientometrics 53, 161–164 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014844222898
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014844222898