Skip to main content
Log in

Administering the Employment Relationship: The Ethics of Conflict Resolution in Relation to Justice in the Workplace

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a historical overview of the ethical concept of organizational due process in relation to contemporary issues in the utilization of company grievance procedures in the rapidly growing nonunion arena. Another objective of this paper is to appraise the current practices that employers have evolved for resolving issues generated by grievances, particularly those of professional, white collar employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aram, J. D. and P. F. Salipante, Jr.: 1981, ‘An Evaluation of Organizational Due Process in the Resolution of Employer/Employee Conflict’, Academy of Management Review 6, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, A.: 1984, ‘Five Types of Non-Union Grievance Systems’, Personnel 61, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, R. H. and E. Hunt: 1989, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: Arbitration of Employment Claims’, Employee Relations Law Journal 15, 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M., B. Spector, P. R. Lawrence, D. Q. Mills and R. E. Walton: 1984, Managing Human Assets (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlander, G. W. and H. White: 1988, ‘Building Bridges: Nonunion Employee Grievance Systems’, Personnel 65, 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, J. D.: 1984, ‘Peer Review: The Emerging Successful Application’, Employee Relations Law Journal 9, 659–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.: 1957, ‘Grievance Systems’, in Human Relations in Business (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, L. B.: 1990, ‘Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace’, American Journal of Sociology 95, 1401–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D. W.: 1977, ‘Making Due Process a Reality’, in Freedom Inside the Organization (E. P. Dutton, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D. W.: 1977, ‘What Business Thinks About Employee Rights’, Harvard Business Review 55, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D. W.: 1982, ‘Due Process: Will Business Default?’, Harvard Business Review 60, 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D. W.: 1983, ‘Due Process and Freedom of Inquiry’, in Do It My Way Or You're Fired! Employee Rights and the Changing Role of Management Prerogatives (John Wiley & Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D. W.: 1989, Justice on the Job: Resolving Grievances in the Nonunion Workplace (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, F. K.: 1980, ‘Grievance Procedures’, in Personnel Policies in Large Nonunion Companies (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, F.: 1981, ‘How Top Nonunion Companies Manage Employees’, Harvard Business Review 59, 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, F. F.: 1981, ‘Large Nonunionized Employers’, in Jack Steiber, Robert B. McKersie and D. Quinn Mills (eds.), U.S. Industrial Relations 1950–1980: A Critical Assessment, Industrial Relations Research Association Series (Wisconsin, Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison).

    Google Scholar 

  • French, W. L.: 1987, The Personnel Management Process: Human Resources Administration and Development, 6th ed. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G. E.: 1992, ‘Perceptions of Justice Afforded by Formal Grievance Systems as Predictors of a Belief in a Just Workplace’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 635–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, T. M., and R. J. Klonoski: 1986, ‘Due Process’, in Business Ethics, 2nd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A., M. L. Reiner and J. C. Goodwin: 1992, ‘Ethical Concerns in Grievance Arbitration’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, B. W., and D. B. Loftus: 1984, Union-Free Complaint Procedures-25 Samples (National Association of Manufacturers, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J.: 1996, The Quest for Justice on the Job: Essays and Experiments (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimann, T. and R. L. Hilgert: 1982, ‘Handling Employee Complaints and Grievances’, in Supervision: Concepts and Practices of Management, 3rd ed. (South-Western, Cincinnati).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, L. A., R. G. Murdick and F. E. Schuster: 1985, ‘Grievance Procedures’, in Human Resource Management (Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A. and T. A. Barocci: 1985, ‘Due Process Procedures for Nonunion Employees’, in Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations: Text Readings, and Cases (Little Brown, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., R. M. Hodgetts and K. R. Thompson: 1980, ‘Dispute Resolution and Procedures for Employee Justice’, in Social Issues in Business, 3rd ed. (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., R. M. Hodgetts and K. R. Thompson: 1987, ‘Employee Justice Systems’, in Social Issues in Business: Strategic and Public Policy Perspectives, 5th ed. (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M.: 1988, ‘Grievance Processing: Non-Union Setting-Peer Review Systems and Internal Corporate Tribunals: A Procedural Analysis’, Labor Law Journal 34, 496–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M.: 1989, ‘Corporate Nonunion Grievance Arbitration Systems: A Procedural Analysis’, Labor Law Journal 40, 432–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M.: 1990, ‘Corporate Nonunion Grievance Procedures: Open Door Policies-A Procedural Analysis’, Labor Law Journal 41, 551–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M. and D. Lewin: 1992, ‘Employee Voice: A Human Resource Management Perspective’, California Management Review 34, 112–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. M.: 1997, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution and Employee Voice in Nonunion Employment: An Ethical Analysis of Organizational Due Process Procedures and Mechanisms-The Case of the United States’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, R. B.: 1990, ‘Ethical Considerations in Alternative Dispute Resolution’, The Arbitration Journal, 15–280.

  • Megginson, L. C.: 1985, ‘Handling Complaints in Nonunion Organizations’, in Personnel Management: A Human Resources Approach, 5th ed. (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, S. R.: 1978, ‘Due Process in Nonunion Grievance Systems’, Employee Relations Law Journal 3, 516–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondy, W. R., H. N. Mills, R. M. Noe III and A. Sharplin: 1984, ‘Grievance Handling for Nonunion Employees’, in Personnel: The Management of Human Resources, 2nd ed. (Allyn and Bacon, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • MuCulloch, K.: 1984, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques: Pros and Cons’, Employment Relations Today 11, 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Manufacturers, Industrial Relations Department: 1982, Settling Complaints in the Union-Free Operation (National Association of Manufacturers, Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson R. B. and D. Lewin: 1990, ‘The Nonunion Grievance Procedure: A Viable System of Due Process?’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 3, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. B.: 1994, ‘Organizational Governance and the Grievance Process: In Need of a New Model for Resolving Workplace Issues’, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 7, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. B. and D. McCabe: 1994, ‘The Nonunion Grievance System in High Performing Firms’, Labor Law Journal 45, 529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, S. H., and D. E. Durand: 1979: ‘Characteristics of an Effective Grievance Procedure’, Administering the Employment Relationship 47 in Supervision: The Management of Organizational Resources (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, R. S.: 1987, ‘Employer Strategies for Employee Job Security Rights’, in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 3rd ed. (West Publishing, St. Paul, Minnesota).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. G.: 1988, ‘The Management Governance Theories of Justice and Liberty’, Journal of Management 14, 277–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. A. and J. F. Steiner: 1985, ‘The Rights Movement in Corporations’ in Business, Government, and Society-A Managerial Perspective: Text and Cases, 4th ed. (Random House Business Division, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotta, M. S. and H. R. Gudenberg: 1976, 'Resolving Personal Problems in Nonunion Plants, Personnel 53, 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G.: 1982, ‘The Right to Due Process’, in Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. H.: 1985, Persons, Rights, and Corporations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A. F.: 1981, ‘New Management Policies and Procedures: The Inside Mechanism’, in Whistle Blowing: Loyalty and Dissent in the Corporation (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A. F. and A. G. Feliu: 1988, Resolving Employment Disputes Without Litigation (Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington, DC).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCabe, D.M., Rabil, J.M. Administering the Employment Relationship: The Ethics of Conflict Resolution in Relation to Justice in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 36, 33–48 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014292025671

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014292025671

Navigation