Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics and HRM: A Review and Conceptual Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews and develops the ethical analysis of human resource management (HRM). Initially, the ethical perspective of HRM is differentiated from the "mainstrea" and critical perspectives of HRM. To date, the ethical analysis of HRM has taken one of two forms: the application Kantian and utilitarian ethical theories to the gestalt of HRM, and the application of theories of justice and fairness to specific HRM practices. This paper is concerned with the former, the ethical analysis of HRM in its entirety. It shows that numerous theoretical shortcomings exist, least of which is the disregard of stakeholder theory. These deficiencies are explored and, as such, the analysis is advanced. It is argued that such ethical analysis is outside the scope of the modern corporation. A third way in which ethics may be applied to HRM is suggested. Ethical concerns are used as a basis to develop minimum standards against which HRM, in its various guises and practice, may be evaluated. Yet, even when judged by these standards, HRM is seriously lacking. This begs the question, not of whether HRM is ethical, but of whether HRM can be ethical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Academy of Management (eds.): 2000, Academy of Management 2000 Proceedings (Academy of Management Toronto, Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. and H. C. Willmott: 1996, Making sense of Management: A Critical Introduction (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. and R. Schalk: 1998, ‘The Psychological Contract in Retrospect and Prospect’, Journal of Organizational Behaviour 19, 637-647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L.: 1993, ‘Manipulative Advertising’, in T. L. Beauchamp and N. E. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. and N. E. Bowie: 1993, Ethical Theory and Business Practice (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B. and B. Gerhart: 1996, ‘The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects’, Academy of Management Journal 39(4), 779-795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E.: 1998, ‘A Kantian Theory of Meaningful Work’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1083-1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T., C. Mabey and D. Skinner: 1998, ‘Experiencing HRM: The Importance of the Inside Story’, in C. Mabey, D. Skinner and T. Clark (eds.), Experiencing Human Resource Management (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, N. and S. Gagnon: 1999, ‘From Ethics "by proxy" to Ethics in Action: New Approaches to Understanding HRM and Ethics’, Business Ethics: A European Review 8(4), 225-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covey, S. R.: 1989, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People: Powerful Lessons in Personal Change (Simon and Shuster, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 1999, ‘Making Stakeholder Theory Whole’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 237-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, R.: 1999, ‘If You Want Loyalty Get a Dog!: Loyalty, Trust and the Employment Contract’, in S. R. Clegg, E. Ibarra-Colado and L. Bueno-Rodriquez (eds.), Global Management: Universal Theories and Local Realities (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. M. and R. E. Freeman: 1988, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, in T. L. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., W. A. Hochwarter, M. R. Buckley, G. Harrell-Cook and D. D. Frink: 1999, ‘Human Resource Management: Some New Directions’, Journal of Management 25(3), 385-423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Boston).

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1999, ‘Divergent Stakeholder Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 233-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profit’, The New York Times Magazine.

  • Goodpaster, K. E.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 53-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, D. and S. Cohen: 1998, Business Ethics: Australian Problems and Cases (Oxford University Press, Melbourne).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. R.: 2001, ‘The Importance of Stakeholders According to Business Leaders’, Business and Society Review 106(1), 29-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D.: 1987, ‘Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations’, Journal of Management Studies 24(5), 503-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D.: 1997, ‘Human Resource Management and Performance: A Review and Research Agenda’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 8(3), 263-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D.: 1999, ‘Human Resource Management-the Workers’ Verdict’, Human Resource Management Journal 9(3), 5-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C.: 1989, The Age of Unreason (Century Hutcheson

  • Handy, C.: 1991, ‘What Is a Company For?’, RSA Journal

  • I. L. O.: 1998, ‘Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work’, 86th Session (Geneva, Switzerland).

  • Jackson, S. E. and R. S. Schuler: 1995, ‘Understanding Human Resource Management in the Context of Organizations and Their Environments’, Annual Review of Psychology 46(1), 237-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and A. C. Wicks: 1999, ‘Convergent Stakeholder Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 206-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamoche, K.: 1994, ‘A Critique and a Proposed Reformulation of Strategic Human Resource Management’, Human Resource Management 4(4), 29-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamoche, K. and F. Mueller: 1998, ‘Human Resource Management and the Appropriation-Learning Perspective’, Human Relations 51(8), 1033-1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1964, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (Harper, New York).

  • Lagan, A.: 2000, Why Ethics Matter: Business Ethics for Business People (Information Australia, Melbourne).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E.: 1992, The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-involvement Organization ( Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K.: 1995, Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Reality (Macmillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K.: 1996, ‘Morality Bound’, People Management 25(2), 34-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K.: 1998, ‘The Morality of HRM’, in C. Mabey, D. Skinner and T. Clark (eds.), Experiencing Human Resource Management (Sage, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.: 1998, ‘The Stakeholder Corporation’, Business Ethics: A European Review 7(1), 30-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P.: 1996, ‘Strategy and Ethical Management of Human Resources’, Human Resource Management Journal 6(1), 5-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, ‘Towards a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead, A., M. Steele, M. Alexander, K. Stephen and L. Duffin: 1997, Changes at Work: The 1995 Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey (Longman, Melbourne, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlando, J.: 1999, ‘The Fourth Wave: The Ethics of Downsizing’, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(2), 295-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. and R. Waterman: 1982, In Search of Excellence (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, P.: 1991, ‘Consequentialism’, in P. Singer (eds.), A Companion to Ethics (Blakwell, Oxford), pp. 230-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and J. F. Veiga: 1999, ‘Putting People First for Organizational Success’, The Academy of Management Executive 13(2), 37-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J.: 1999, ‘Best Practice and Best Fit: Chimera or cul-de-sac?’, Human Resource Management Journal 9(3), 26-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A.: 1986, Creating Shareholder Value: The New Standard for Business Performance (The Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1972, A Theory of Justice (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., M. S. Kraatz and D. M. Rousseau: 1994, ‘Changing Obligations and the Psychological Contract: A Longitudinal Study’, Academy of Management Journal 37(1), 137-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. and D. M. Rousseau: 1994, ‘Violating the Psychological Contract: Not the Exception but the Norm’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 15, 245-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M.: 1995, Psychological Contracts in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. and J. M. Parks: 1992, ‘The Contracts of Individuals and Organisations’, Research in Organizational Behavior 15, 1-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. R.: 2000, ‘The Moral Foundation of Employee Rights’, Journal of Business Ethics 24(2), 355-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R.: 1998, The Corrosion of Character (W.W. Norton, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R.: 1999, ‘How Work Destroys Social Inclusion’, New Statesman, 25-27.

  • Shuler, R. S. and R. E. Jackson: 1987, ‘Linking Competitive Strategy and Human Resource Management Practices’, Academy of Management Executive 1(3), 207-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. G., C. W. Powers and J. P. Gunneman: 1993, ‘The Responsibilities of Corporations and Their Owners’, in T. L. Beauchamp and N. E. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. J.: 1998, Human Resource Management ( John Wiley and Sons, Brisbane, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B.: 1993, ‘Foucault, Power/Knowledge, and Its Relevance for Human Resource Management’, Academy of Management Review 18(3), 518-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. and G. R. Weaver: 1999, ‘The Stakeholder Tradition: Convergent Theorist-Not Convergent Theories’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 222-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truss, C., L. Gratton, V. Hope-Hailey, P. McGovern and P. Stiles: 1997, ‘Soft and Hard Models of Human Resource Management: A Reappraisal’, Journal of Management Studies 34(1), 53-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, D.: 1998, ‘A New Mandate for Human Resources’, Harvard Business Review 76(1), 125-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallance, E.: 1995, Business Ethics at Work (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E.: 1985, ‘From Control to Commitment in the Workplace’, Harvard Business Review 63, 77-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. C.: 2000, ‘Putting the Person Back into Human Resource Management’, D. Winstanley and J. Woodall (eds.), Third Conference on Ethics and Human Resource Management (Imperial College Management School, London, U.K.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H.: 1997, ‘Rethinking Managerial Work: Capitalism, Control, and Subjectivity’, Human Relations 50(11), 1329-1359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, D. and J. Woodall: 2000, ‘The Ethical Dimensions of Human Resource Management’, Human Resource Management Journal 10(2), 5-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, D., J. Woodall and E. Heery: 1996a, ‘Business Ethics and Human Resource Management Themes and Issues’, Personnel Review 25(6), 5-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, D., J. Woodall and E. Heery: 1996b, ‘The Agenda for Ethics in Human Resource Management’, Business Ethics: A European Review 5(4), 187-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. M. and G. C. McMahan: 1992, ‘Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management’, Journal of Management 18(2), 295-321.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Box 11e, Victoria, 3800, Australia

    Michelle R. Greenwood

Authors
  1. Michelle R. Greenwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenwood, M.R. Ethics and HRM: A Review and Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 36, 261–278 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014090411946

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014090411946

Search

Navigation