Skip to main content
Log in

Verificationism, Realism And Scepticism

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Verificationism has often seemed attractive to philosophers because of its apparent abilityto deliver us from scepticism. However, I argue that purely epistemological considerationsprovide insufficient reason for embracing verificationism over realism. I distinguish twotypes of sceptical problem: those that stem from underdetermination by the actual data,and those that stem from underdetermination by all possible data. Verificationismevades problems of the second sort, but is powerless in the face of problems of the firstsort. But problems of the first sort are equally pressing. Furthermore, there is some reasonto think that the two types of problem have a common origin. Thus the desire to avoidscepticism provides insufficient reason for adopting verificationism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beauchamp, T. and A. Rosenberg: 1981, Hume and the Problem of Causation,Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B.:1985, ‘What Science Aims to Do’, in P. Churchlandand C. Hooker (eds.), Images of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Fodor, J. andE. Lepore: 1994, Holism: A Shopper's Guide, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glymour, C.: 1992,Thinking Things Through, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: 1740, A Treatise of HumanNature, 2nd edition, L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L.:1974, The Cement of the Universe, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1986, The View fromNowhere, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton-Smith, W. H.: 1978, ‘The Underdetermination of Theory byData’, Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 52, 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S.: 1997, ‘Epistemology and the Underdetermination of Theory by Data’, D Phil Thesis, University of Oxford.

  • Putnam, H.: 1978, Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1994, ‘Sense, Nonsense and the Senses: An Inquiry into the Powers of the Human Mind’, Journal of Philosophy 91, 445–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1970, ‘On the Reasons for theIndeterminacy of Translation’, Journal of Philosophy 67, 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1938,Experience and Prediction, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.: 1967, TheFoundations of Scientific Inference, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove, D.: 1973,Probability and Hume's Inductive Scepticism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, B.: 1977, Hume,Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, B.: 1984, The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism,Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.: 1996, Unnatural Doubts, Princeton UniversityPress, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J.: 1982, ‘Scientific Realism and Scientific Change’, PhilosophicalQuarterly 32, 201–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C.: 1993, Realism, Meaning and Truth, 2nd edition,Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okasha, S. Verificationism, Realism And Scepticism. Erkenntnis 55, 371–385 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013370201189

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013370201189

Keywords

Navigation