Skip to main content
Log in

Developing Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Courses: A Philosophical Approach

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is centred on twentieth century philosophers of science. I will examine how they have influenced current physics educational research by others and myself. I will also examine how I have introduced a study of these philosophers in several courses including the calculus-based introductory physics course on optics and modern physics. Students study one philosopher all semester as a group project and report regularly on how their philosopher would view the subject matter of the course. As a consequence of this use of philosophers of science, the students seem to have made a marked improvement in their critical thinking skills and in their grasp of the underlying concepts of the subject matter of the courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg, R.: 1992, The Video Encyclopedia of Physics Demonstrations, The Education Group, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D. R. (eds.): 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, David Mckay, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. & Krathwohl, D. R. (eds.): 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain, David Mckay, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J., Dall'alba, G., Martin, E., Laurillard, D., Marton, F., Masters, G., Ramsden, P., Stephanou, A. & Walsh, E.: 1992, 'Displacement, Velocity, and Frames of Reference: Phenomenographic Studies of Students' Understanding and Some Implications for Teaching and Assessment', American Journal of Physics 60, 262-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. G.: 1974, 'Should the History of Science be Rated X?', Science 183, 1164-1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. & Gitomer, D.: 1991, 'Epistemological Perspectives on Conceptual Change: Implications for Educational Practice', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28, 839-858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, J. L.: 1996, 'Using Paradoxes to Teach Critical Thinking in Science', Journal of College Science Teaching 15, 341-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A. (ed.): 1990, Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction, American Philosophical Association. ERIC ED 315 423.

  • Feyerabend, P.: 1993, Against Method, 3rd edn, Verso, New York, NY.

  • Fogarty, R. & McTighe, J.: 1993, 'Educating Teachers for Higher Order Thinking: The Three-Story Intellect', Theory into Practice 32, 162-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo Galilei: 1967, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Ptolemaic & Copernican; translated by Stillman Drake, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo Galilei: 1953, Trattato della Sfera, Opere, Vol. 11, Picciardi, Milan, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R.: 1987, 'Student Understanding in Mechanics: A Large Population Survey', American Journal of Physics 55, 691-696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F.: 1997, Critical Thinking across the Curriculum: A Brief Edition of Thought and Knowledge, 3rd edn, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. & Brush, S. G.: 1973, Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science, 2nd edn, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloun, I. & Hestenes, D.: 1985, 'The Initial Knowledge State of College Physics Students', American Journal of Physics 53, 1043-1055; 'Common Sense Concepts about Motion', American Journal of Physics 53, 1056–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D., Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G.: 1992, 'Force Concept Inventory', The Physics Teacher 30, 141-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. & Hewson, M.: 1984, 'The Role of Conceptual Conflict in Conceptual Change and the Design of Scientific Instruction', Instructional Science 13, 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalman, C. S.: 1999, 'Teaching Science to Non-Science Students Using a Student-Centred Classroom', in K. Ahmet and S. Fallows (eds.), Inspiring Students: Case Studies in Motivating the Learner, SEDA–Staff and Educational Development Series Kogan Page Limited, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalman, C. S., Morris, S., Cottin, C. & Gordon, R.: 1999, 'Promoting Conceptual Change Using Collaborative Groups in Quantitative Gateway Courses', American Journal of Physics: Physics Educational Research Supplement 67, S45-S51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd edn, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970, 'Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrove (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91-196), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J.: 1993, 'How Classroom Teachers Approach the Teaching of Thinking', Theory into Practice 32, 154-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, M. & Osbourne, J.: 1997, 'Placing the History and Philosophy of Science on the Curriculum: A Model for the Development of Pedagogy', Science Education 81, 405-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. E.: 1994, 'Critical Thinking and Collaborative Learning', in K. Boswald, S. J. Hamilton (eds.), Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques, New Directions for Teaching and Learning #59; Jossey Bass Higher Education and Adult Education Series, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S. P. (ed.): 1992, The Generalizability of Critical Thinking, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M. R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L.: 1984, 'Research on Conceptual Understanding in Mechanics', Physics Today (July) 24–32.

  • McDermott, L., Rosenquist, M., & van Zee, E.: 1987, 'Student Difficulties in Connecting Graphs and Physics: Examples from Kinematics', American Journal of Physics 55, 503-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeck, J. E.: 1981, Critical Thinking and Education, M. Robertson, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R.: 1985, 'McPeck's Mistakes: Why Critical Thinking Applies across Disciplines and Domains', Informal Logic 7(1), 35-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R.: 1990, Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World, Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Rohnert Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1929, The Child's Conception of the World, Harcourt Brace, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1967, Six Psychological Studies, Vintage, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P., Marx, R. & Boyle, R.: 1993, 'Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change', Reviews of Educational Research 63, 167-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1962, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P. & Gertzog, W.: 1982, 'Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change', Science Education 66, 211-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenquist, M. & McDermott, L.: 1987, 'A Conceptual Approach to Teaching Kinematics', American Journal of Physics 55, 407-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. & Lucas, K.: 1997, 'From “Truth” to “Invented Reality”: A Discourse Analysis of High School Physics Students" Talk about Scientific Knowledge', Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34, 145-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A. & Posner, G. J.: 1992. 'A Revisionist Theory of Conceptual of Conceptual Change', in R. A. Duschl and R. J. Hamilton (eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology and Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 147-176), State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, P.-K. & Gunstone, D.: 1997, 'The Process of Conceptual Change in “Force and Motion”', Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Toulmin, S.: 1972, Human Understanding: An Inquiry into the Aims of Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M.: 1993, 'Critical Thinking: The Great Debate', Educational Theory 43, 99-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieger, L. B.: 1998, 'Critical Thinking Resources: An Annotated Bibliography', http://www.montclair,edu/Pages/CRC/Bibliographies/CriticalThinking.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalman, C.S. Developing Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Courses: A Philosophical Approach. Science & Education 11, 83–94 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013071130538

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013071130538

Keywords

Navigation