Skip to main content
Log in

Emergence as Non-Aggregativity and the Biases of Reductionisms

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most philosophical accounts of emergence are incompatible with reduction. Most scientists regard a system property as emergent relative to properties of its parts if it depends upon their mode of organization-a view consistent with reduction. Emergence is a failure of aggregativity, in which ``the whole is nothing more than the sum of its parts''. Aggregativity requires four conditions, giving powerful tools for analyzing modes of organization. Differently met for different decompositions of the system, and in different degrees, the structural conditions can provide evaluation criteria for choosing decompositions, ``natural kinds'', and detecting functional localization fallacies, approximations, and various biases of vulgar reductionisms. This analysis of emergence and use of these conditions as heuristics is consistent with a broader reductionistic methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abbott, A.: 2001, Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ch. 6. This analysis will appear as ch. 8 of his forthcoming book, Chaos among the Disciplines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G.: 1979, Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton: Princeton University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. and R.C. Richardson: 1992, Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Scientific Research Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callebaut, W.: 1993, Taking the Naturalistic Turn, or How Real Philosophy of Science is Done. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie. London: Cambridge U. P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L.: 1992, Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford U. P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1995, Darwin's Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S. M.: 1992, The Importance of Models in Theorizing: A Deflationary Semantic View. In D. Hull, M. Forbes and K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA-1992. East Lansing: The Philosophy of Science Association, 1: 142–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennan, S. S.: 1992, Mechanisms, Models, and Causation, Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Philosophy, The University of Chicago.

  • Griesemer, J. and W. Wimsatt: 1989, Picturing Weismannism – Case Study of Conceptual Evolution. In M. Ruse (ed.), What Philosophy of Biology is Not, (Festschrift for David Hull) Dordrecht: Martinus-Nijhoff, 75–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.: 1971, Articulation of Parts Explanations in Biology and the Rational Search for Them. In R. Buck and R.S. Cohen (eds.), PSA-1970. Dordrecht: Reidel, 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.: 1993, The Origins of Order: Self-organization and Selection in Evolution. London: Oxford U. P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R.: 1966, The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology, American Scientist: 421–431.

  • Levins, R.: 1968, Evolution in Changing Environments, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R.: 1973, Complexity. In C.H. Waddington (ed.), Towards a Theoretical Biology, v. 3. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. and R.C. Lewontin: 1985, The Dialectical Biologist, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C.: 1978, Adaptation, Scientific American, September.

  • Mainschein, J.: 1991, Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, S.: 1992, Robustness and Objectivity, draft ms. in English, 1992 (Spanish version published in Dianoia, (Annual of Instituto de Investigaciones Filosoficas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico)), 1992.

  • McClamrock, R.: 1991, Marr's Three Levels: A Re-Evaluation, Minds and Machines1: 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, L.: 1992, A Kernel of Truth? On the Reality of the Genetic Program. In D. Hull, M. Forbes and K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA-1992, volume 1. East Lansing: The Philosophy of Sciences Association, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science, New York: Harcourt Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J.L.: 1990, Meta-Stable States: The Justification of Approximative Procedures in Chemical Kinetics, 1923–1947. Ph.D., Committee on Conceptual Foundations of Science, University of Chicago.

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1978, The Supervenience of Biological Concepts, Philosophy of Science45: 368–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S.: 1992, Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism, Synthese91: 167–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, J.C. and W.C. Wimsatt: 1993, ModelBuilding 2.0, Simulation software to run on the Macintosh family for teaching model building and its critical analysis. Part of the BioQUEST library of Strategic Simulations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1962, The Architecture of Complexity, reprinted in his The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, 1981. 3rd. ed., 1996.

  • Wade, M.J.: 1996, Adaptation in Subdivided Populations:Kin Selection and Interdemic Selection. In M. Rose and G. Lauder (eds.), Adaptation. New York: Academic Press, 381–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, K.: 1990, Why the Anti-reductionist Consensus Won't Survive the Case of Classical Mendelian Genetics. In A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds.), PSA-1990. East Lansing: The Philosophy of Science Association, 1: 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1971, Some Problems with the Concept of ‘Feedback’. In R.C. Buck and R.S. Cohen (eds.), PSA-1970 (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol.8), Dordrecht: Reidel, 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1974, Complexity and Organization. In R. Buck and R.S. Cohen (eds.), PSA-1972, Boston Studies in Phil. Sci.20: 67–86.

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1976a, Reductionism, Levels of Organization and theMind-Body Problem. In G.G. Globus, G. Maxwell and I. Savodnik (eds.), Consciousness and the Brain. New York: Plenum, 199–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1976b, Reductive Explanation – A Functional Account. In A.C. Michalos, C.A. Hooker, G. Pearce and R.S. Cohen (eds.), PSA-1974 (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, volume 30)Dordrecht: Reidel, 671–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1979, Reduction and Reductionism. In P.D. Asquith and H. Kyberg (eds.), Current Research in Philosophy of Science. East Lansing, Michigan: The Philosophy of Science Association, 352–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1980b, Reductionistic Research Strategies and their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy. In T. Nickles (ed.), Scientific Discovery-vol.II: Case Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel. 213–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1981a, Robustness, Reliability and Overdetermination. In R. Brewer and B. Collins (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. (festschrift for Donald Campbell)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1985, Heuristics and the Study of Human Behavior. In D.W. Fiske and R. Shweder (eds.), Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralisms and Subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 293-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1986, Forms of Aggregativity. In A. Donagan, N. Perovich and M. Wedin (eds.), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge, (Festschrift for Marjorie Grene), Dordrecht: Reidel, 259–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1987, False Models as means to Truer Theories. In M. Nitecki and A. Hoffman (eds.), Neutral Models in Biology. London: Oxford University Press, 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1992, Golden Generalities and Co-opted Anomalies: Haldane vs. Muller and the DrosophilaGroup on the Theory and Practice of Linkage mapping. In S. Sarkar (ed.), The Foundars of Evolutionary Genetics. Martinus-Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 107–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C. and J.C. Schank: 1993, Modelling – A Primer, 230 page lab manual/textbook accompanying BioQUEST software (Schank and Wimsatt, 1993) to teach model building and its critical analysis using as examples single species growth equations (logistic and minimum-density limited logistic) and a model of blending inheritance, showing that we can use false models to build better ones. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1994, The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets. In M. Matthen and R. Ware (eds.), Biology and Society: Reflections on Methodology, Canadian Journal of Philosophy20: 207–274.

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 1997, Functional Organization, Functional Analogy, and Functional Inference, Evolution and Cognition3(2): 102–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W.C.: 2002, Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridege: Harvard U. P.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wimsatt, W.C. Emergence as Non-Aggregativity and the Biases of Reductionisms. Foundations of Science 5, 269–297 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011342202830

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011342202830

Navigation