Abstract
The aim of this article is to describe some methods of comparison of maps of science and to show possibilities that these methods give for further research in this interesting area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cahlik, T., Jirina, M.: Scientometric analysis of Artificial Neural Networks scientific field, Neural Network World, 1997, No. 2.
Cahlik, T., Jirina, M.: Knowledge restructuring during scientific field development. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Techniques, Brno 1996.
Callon, M., Law, J., Rip, A.: Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. MacMillan, London, 1986.
Courtial, J. P.: Introduction a la Scientométrie, Anthropos, Paris, 1991.
Courtial, J. P., Cahlik, T., Callon, M.: A model for social interaction between cognition and action through a key-word simulation of knowledge growth, Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 173-192.
Garfield, E.: Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and the Humanities. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1979.
Kuhn, T. S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press, 1970.
Small, H., Garfield, E.: The geography of science: Disciplinary and national mappings, Journal of Information Science, 11 (1985), 147-159.
Turner, W. A., Rojouan, F.: Evaluating input/output relationship in a regional research network using coword analysis, Scientometrics, 22 (1991) 139-154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cahlik, T. Comparison of the Maps of Science. Scientometrics 49, 373–387 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010581421990
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010581421990