Skip to main content
Log in

Constraints and the Measurement of Freedom of Choice

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces considerations about constraints in the construction of measures of an agent's freedom. It starts with motivating the exercise from both the philosophical and the informational point of view. Then it presents two rankings of opportunity sets based on information about the extent of options and the constraints that a decision maker faces. The first ranking measures freedom as variety of choice; the second as non-restrictedness in choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Baigent, N. and Gaertner, W. (1996), Never Choose the Uniquely Largest: A Characterization, Economic Theory 8(2): 239-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1969), Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, G. (1997), Generalised Rough Sets (Preclusivity Fuzzy-Intuitionistic (BZ) Lattices), Studia Logica 58: 47-77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, W. and Xu, Y. (1999a), On rationalizability of choice functions: A characterization of the median, Social Choice and Welfare 16: 629-638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, W. and Xu, Y. (1999b), Rationality and External Reference, Rationality and Society 11: 169-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, W., Pattanaik, P. K. and Suzumura, K. (1992), Individual Rights Revisited, Economica 59: 161-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. and Sugden, R. (1982), Evaluating Choice, International Review of Law and Economics 2: 47-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemisch-Alhert, M. (1993), Freedom of Choice. A Comparison of Different Rankings of Opportunity Sets, Social Choice and Welfare 10: 189-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (1996), Social Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, G. C. (1967), Negative and Positive Freedom, The Philosophical Review 76: 312-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., ed. (1991), Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P.K. and K. Suzumura, (1996), IndividualRights and Social Evaluation: A Conceptual Framework, Oxford Economic Papers 48: 194-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P.K. and Xu, Y. (1990), On Ranking Opportunity Sets in Terms of Freedom of Choice, Recherches Économiques de Louvain 56: 383-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanaik, P.K. and Xu, Y. (1998), On Preferences and Freedom, Theory and Decision 44: 173-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z. (1982), Rough Sets, International Journal of Information and Computer Sciences 11: 341-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppe, C. (1996), An Axiomatic Approach to 'Preference for Freedom of Choice', Journal of Economic Theory 68: 174-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1988), Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content, European Economic Review 32: 269-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1991), Welfare, Preference and Freedom, Journal of Econometrics 50: 15-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1993a), Internal Consistency of Choice, Econometrica 61: 495-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1993b), Markets and Freedoms: Achievements and Limitations of the Market Mechanism in Promoting Individual Freedoms, Oxford Economic Papers 45: 519-541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1987), Maximizing Freedom of Decision: An Axiomatic Analysis, In: Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. London: MacMillan, pp. 243-254.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastiano Bavetta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bavetta, S., Del Seta, M. Constraints and the Measurement of Freedom of Choice. Theory and Decision 50, 213–238 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010384118394

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010384118394

Navigation