Abstract
This paper defends a purely semantic notionof what is said against various recent objections. Theobjections each cite some sort of linguistic,psychological, or epistemological fact that issupposed to show that on any viable notion of what aspeaker says in uttering a sentence, there ispragmatic intrusion into what is said. Relying on amodified version of Grice's notion, on which what issaid must be a projection of the syntax of the utteredsentence, I argue that a purely semantic notion isneeded to account for the linguistically determinedinput to the hearer's inference to what, if anything,the speaker intends to be conveying in uttering thesentence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Austin, J. L.: 1962, How to do Things with Words, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bach, Kent: 1984, ‘Default Reasoning: Jumping to Conclusions and Knowing when to Think Twice’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65, 37-58.
Bach, Kent: 1992, ‘Intentions and Demonstrations’ Analysis 52, 140-146.
Bach, Kent: 1994a, ‘Conversational Impliciture’ Mind & Language 9, 124-162.
Bach, Kent: 1994b, Thought and Reference, paperback edition, revised with postscript, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bach, Kent: 1995, ‘Standardization and Conventionalization’ Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 677-686.
Bach, Kent: 1998, ‘Standardization Revisited’ in A. Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, Vol. IV, Routledge, London, pp. 712-722.
Bach, Kent: 1999a, ‘The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction:What it is andWhy it Matters’ in Ken Turner (ed.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 65-84.
Bach, Kent: 1999b, ‘The Myth of Conventional Implicature’ Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 327-366.
Bach, Kent: 2000, ‘Quantification, Qualification, and Context’ Mind & Language 15.
Bach, Kent and Robert Harnish: 1979, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Barker, Chris: 1995, Possessive Descriptions, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
Barwise, Jon and John Perry: 1983, Situations and Attitudes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bezuidenhout, Anne: 1997, ‘Semantics, Pragmatics, Semantic Underdetermination, and the Referential/Attributive Distinction’ Mind 106, 375-409.
Carston, Robyn: 1988, ‘Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-theoretic Semantics’ in R. M. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 155-181.
Gibbs, Raymond and Jessica Moise: 1997, ‘Pragmatics in Understanding what is Said’ Cognition 62, 51-74.
Grice, Paul: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
King, Jeffrey: 1995, ‘Structured Propositions and Complex Predicates’ Noûs 29, 516-535.
Levinson, Stephen: 2000, Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicatures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Mauner, Gail and Jean-Pierre Koenig: 1999, ‘Lexical Encoding of Event Participant Information’ Brain and Language 68, 178-184.
May, Robert: 1991, ‘Syntax, Semantics, Logical Form’ in A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 334-359.
Neale, Stephen: 1990, Descriptions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Partee, Barbara: 1989, ‘Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts’ Papers from the Chicago Linguistics Society 25, 342-365.
Partee, Barbara: 1995, ‘Lexical Semantics and Compositionality’ in L. Gleitman and M. Liberman (eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Volume 1: Language, 2nd edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 311-360.
Perry, John: 1986, ‘Thought without Representation’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 60, pp. 137-151.
Predelli, Stefano: 1998, ‘I am not Here Now’ Analysis 58, 107-115.
Pustejovsky, James: 1995, The Generative Lexicon, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Recanati, François: 1989, ‘The Pragmatics of what is Said’ Mind and Language 4, 294-328.
Recanati, François: 1993, Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.
Recanati, François: 1995, ‘The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation’ Cognitive Science 19, 207-232.
Recanati, François: this issue, ‘What is Said’.
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson: 1986, Relevance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Stanley, Jason: 2000, ‘Context and Logical Form’ Linguistics & Philosophy 23.
Stanley, Jason and Zoltan Szabó: 2000, ‘On Quantifier Domain Restriction’ Mind & Language 15.
Taylor, Kenneth: this issue, ‘Sex, Breakfast, and Descriptus Interruptus’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bach, K. You Don't Say?. Synthese 128, 15–44 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010353722852
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010353722852