Abstract
This is a reply to the comment by M. Kastner and M. Promberger on the paper published in J. Stat. Phys. 99:691 (2000) and also in Cond-Mat 0002176. We show that all their criticisms do not apply.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A.R. de Lima, P. M. C. de Oliveira, and T. J. P. Penna, J. Stat. Phys. 99:691 (2000) (also in Cond-Mat 0002176).
M. Kastner and M. Promberger, Cond-Mat 0011516 (2000).
P. M. C. de Oliveira, T. J. P. Penna, and H. J. Herrmann, Braz. J. Phys. 26:677 (1996) (also in Cond-Mat 9610041).
P. M. C. de Oliveira, Eur. Phys. J. B6:111 (1998) (also in Cond-Mat 9807354).
A. R. de Lima, P. M. C. de Oliveira, and T. J. P. Penna, Solid State Comm. 114:447 (2000) (also in Cond-Mat 9912152).
J. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71:211 (1993).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lima, A.R., Penna, T.J.P. & de Oliveira, P.M.C. Reply to a Comment on “A Comparison Between Broad Histogram and Multicanonical Methods”. Journal of Statistical Physics 104, 895–899 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010345125540
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010345125540