Abstract
This article addresses, from a Frankfurt School perspective on law identified with Franz Neumann and more recently Habermas, the attack upon the principles of war criminality formulated at the Nuremberg trials by the increasingly influential legal and political theory of Carl Schmitt. It also considers the contradictions within certain of the defence arguments that Schmitt himself resorted to when interrogated as a possible war crimes defendant at Nuremberg. The overall argument is that a distinctly internal, or “immanent”, form of critique is required of Schmitt's position, in which its is found wanting even on its own terms. In principle, the application of this dialectical mode of critique can allow a genuine debate to emerge between those seeking to continue both the Schmittian and critical theory traditions, whilst safeguarding the latter from the dangers of formulating polemical interventions that are, in effect, counterproductive to their own intentions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barker, E., Reflections on Government (Oxford: OUP, 1942).
Bendersky, J., Carl Schmitt: Theorist for the Reich (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983).
Bendersky, J., “Carl Schmitt at Nuremberg”, Tel os 72 (1987), 91–96; followed by Schmitt's Nuremberg interrogation record, 97–129.
Caldwell, P., “National Socialism and Constitutional Law: Carl Schmitt and Otto Koellreu-ter”, Cardozo L. Rev. 16 (1994), 399–427.
Carty, A., “Interwar German Theories of International Law: The Psychoanalytical and Phenomenological Perspective of Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt”, Cardozo L. Rev. 16 (1995), 1235–1292.
Chase, A., “The Left on Rights: An Introduction”, Tex. L. Rev. 62 (1984), 1541–1561.
Cotterrell, R., Law's Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
Cotterrell, R., “The Rule of Law in Transition: Revisiting Franz Neumann's Sociology of Legality”, Social and Legal Studies 5 (1996), 451–470.
Dyzenhaus, D., “Now the Machine Runs Itself: Carl Schmitt on Hobbes and Kelsen”, Cardozo L. Rev. 16 (1994), 1–19.
Dyzenhaus, D., Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).
Habermas, J., The New Conservatism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989).
Habermas, J., The Past as Future, tr. Max Pensky (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1994).
Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).
Habermas, J., A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, tr. S. Rendall (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1997).
Heideking, J. and Mauch, C., American Intelligence and the German Resistance to Hitler: A Documentary History (New York, Boulder and Co, Westview Press, 1996).
Hirst, P., “Review of Neumann (1986)”, Public Law (1987), 474–476.
Hughes, H.S., “The Second Year of the Cold War”, Commentary 48(2) (1969), 27–32.
Jay, M., The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923–1950 (Boston: Little Brown, 1973).
Katz, B., Herbert Marcuse and The Art of Liberation (London, New Left Books, 1982).
Katz, B., Foreign Intelligence: Research and Analysis in the Office of Strategic Services 1942–1945 (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).
Kellner, D., Herbert Marcuse: Technology War and Fascism (London: Routledge, 1998).
Kennedy, E., “Carl Schmitt and the Frankfurt School”, Telos 72 (1987a), 37–66.
Kennedy, E., “Carl Schmitt and the Frankfurt School: A Rejoinder”, Telos 73 (1987b), 101–116.
Kirchheimer, O., Political Justice, The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends (West-port: Greenwood Press, 1961).
McCarthy, T., “The Politics of the Ineffable”, in M. Kelly, ed., Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1990), 146–169.
Maus, I., “The 1933 ‘Break’ in Carl Schmitt's Theory”, Canadian Jnl of Law and Jurisprudence 10 (1997), 125–140.
Muller, I., Judicial Positivism and Hitler's Injustice (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).
Neumann, F., Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism 1933–1942 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1942. A 2nd revised edition with extended appendix covering events 1942–1944 was published by O.U.P. in 1944.
Neumann, F., “Introduction” to Montesquieu Spirit of the Laws (London: Macmillan, 1949).
Neumann, F., The Democratic and Authoritarian State, in H. Marcuse, ed. (New York: Free Press, 1957) (which includes Neumann's 1937 and 1940 publications).
Neumann, F., The Rule OfLaw (Leamington Spa: Berg Publishers, 1986).
O'sullivan, N., Fascism (London: Dent and Son, 1983).
Piccione, P. and Ulman, G., “Introduction to Carl Schmitt”, Telos 72 (1987), 22–14.
Ruete, M., “Introduction” to Neumann's The Rule of Law (1986).
Salter, M. and Shaw, J., “Towards a Critical Theory of Constitutional Law: Hegel's Contribution”, J. of Law and Society 21 (1994), 464–486.
Salter, M., “Dialectical Lessons for the Failure of Marxism”, Social and Legal Studies 7 (1998), 437–442.
Scheuerman, W., “The Fascism of Carl Schmitt: A Response of George Schwab”, German Politics and Society 29 (1993), 33–50.
Scheuerman, W., Between the Norms and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule Of Law (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1994).
Scheuerman, W., ed., The Rule of Law Under Siege: Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann & Otto Kirchheimer (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).
Schmitt, C., Die Diktatur (Berlin: Dunker & Humblot, 1919).
Schmitt, C., “Neue Leitsätze für die Rechtspraxis”, Juristische Wochenschrift 62/50 (1933).
Schmitt, C., The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, tr. E. Kennedy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985).
Schmitt, C., Glossarium: 1947–1951, in E. Von Meden, eds. (Berlin: Dunker & Humblot, 1991).
Schmitt, C., “Das International-rechtliche Verbrechen des Angriffskrieges” (collection of Schmitt's unpublished works), in H. Quaritsch, ed. (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994), 1–22.
Schwab, G., The Challenge of the Exception, 2nd ed. (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1989).
Smith, B., The Shadow Warriors: OSS and the Origins of the CIA (New York: Basic Books, 1983).
Söllner, A., ed., Zur Archäeologie der Demokratie in Deutschland, Vol. I (Frankfurt am Main: Europaische Verlagsanstalt, 1982).
Söllner, A., “Beyond Carl Schmitt: Political Theory in the Frankfurt School”, Telos 71 (1987), 81–96.
Seitzer, J., “Carl Schmitt's Internal Critique of Liberal Constitutionalism”, The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence X (1997), 203–224.
Tribe, K., “Introduction to Neumann, Law and Socialist Political Theory”, Economy and Society 10 (1981), 316–333.
Tribe, K., ed., Social Democracy and the Rule of Law (London: Allen and Unwin, 1987).
Tych, B. and Salter, M., “Comparing Legal Cultures: The Need for a Dialectical Approach”, Legal Studies 17 (1996), 157–184.
Ulmen, G., “Just Wars or Just Enemies”, Telos 109 (1996), 99–113.
Vagts, D., “International law in the Third Reich”, A.J.I.L. 84 (1990), 661–704.
Wiegandt, R., “The Alleged Unaccountability of the Academic: A Biographical Sketch of Carl Schmitt”, Cardozo L. Rev. 16 (1995), 1569–1598.
Wiggershaus, R., The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance, tr. M. Robertson (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994).
Wolin, R., “Carl Schmitt, Political Existentialism, and the Total State”, Theory and Society 19 (1990), 389–416.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salter, M. Neo-Fascist Legal Theory on Trial: An Interpretation of Carl Schmitt's Defence at Nuremberg from the Perspective of Franz Neumann's Critical Theory of Law. Res Publica 5, 161–193 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009688423581
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009688423581