Skip to main content
Log in

Unification of Mathematical Theories

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article the problem of unification of mathematical theories is discussed. We argue, that specific problems arise here, which are quite different than the problems in the case of empirical sciences. In particular, the notion of unification depends on the philosophical standpoint. We give an analysis of the notion of unification from the point of view of formalism, Gödel's platonism and Quine's realism. In particular we show, that the concept of “having the same object of study” should be made precise in the case of mathematical theories. In the appendix we give a working proposal of a certain understanding of this notion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • P. Bernays: 1964, On Platonism in Mathematics, reprinted in: P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam H. (eds): Philosophy of Mathematics, Prentice-Hall.

  • J. Brown: 1990, II in the Sky. In A.D. Irvine (ed): Physicalism in Mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Cantor: 1932, Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts. Hrsg. E. Zermelo, Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin 1932; reprinted: Springer-Verlag, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.J. Cohen: 1971, Comments on the Foundations of Set Theory. In D. Scott (ed): Axiomatic Set Theory, Proceedings in Symposia in Pure Mathematics, 13, part 1, AMS, Provindence, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.B. Curry: 1951, Formalist Philosophy ofMathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Gödel: 1947, What is Cantor's Continum Problem?, reprinted in: P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds): Philosophy of Mathematics, Prentice-Hall.

  • G.H. Hardy: 1929, Mathematical Proof. Mind 38: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kunen: 1980, Set Theory. North-Holland.

  • I. Lakatos: 1976, Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Mac Lane: 1986, Mathematics: Form and Function. Springer-Verlag.

  • Y. Moschovakis: 1980, Descriptive Set Theory. North-Holland.

  • J. PARIS and L. Harrington: 1977, A Mathematical Incompleteness in Peano Arithmetic. In J. Barwise (ed): Handbook of Mathematical Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Robinson: 1964, Formalism 64. In Proceedings, International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science.

  • W.V.O. Quine: 1964, Two Dogmas of Empiricsm, reprinted in: P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds): Philosophy of Mathematics. Prentice-Hall.

  • W.V.O. Quine: 1969, Existence and Quantification. In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.G. Simpson: 1987, Subsystems of Z2 and Reverse Mathematics. In G. Takuti (ed.): Proof Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.G. Simpson: 1988, Partial Realisations of Hilbert's Program. Journal of Symbolic Logic 53: 349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wójtowicz, K. Unification of Mathematical Theories. Foundations of Science 3, 207–229 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009665705969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009665705969

Navigation