REFERENCES
Teel K. The physician's dilemma-a doctor's view: What the law should be. Baylor Law Review. 1975; 27:6–9.
In re Quinlan, 38B A 2d 801 (Ch. Div. 1975), rev'd 355 A 2d 647, 649 (N.J. 1976).
Federal Code. Section 46.106–206.
Office of Health and Human Development Services. Services and Treatment for Disabled Infants. Federal Register. 50 April 15, 1985, pp. 11893–94.
Spicker SF. (ed.) The Healthcare Ethics Committee Experience: Selected readings from HEC Forum. Melbourne, FL: Krieger Publishing Co.; 1998.
Bai K. Characteristics of ethical committees of Japanese medical schools. International Journal of Medicine and Law. 1992; 11:337–43.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report. Wasdhington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1978.
In re Spring. Mass. App. 405 N.E. 2nd 115 (1980).
MacIntyre A. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press; 1988.
Engelhardt, H.T. Jr., The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Beauchamp T, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1979.
Jonse A, Toulmin S. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1988.
Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern Condition. Trans. Bennington G, Massumi B. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press; 1984.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Engelhardt, H.T. Healthcare Ethics Committees: Re-examining their Social and Moral Functions. HEC Forum 11, 87–100 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008924324241
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008924324241