Skip to main content
Log in

Farewell to certitude: Einstein's novelty on Induction and Deduction, Fallibilism

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the late 19th century great changes in theories of light and electricity were in direct conflict with certitude, the view that scientific knowledge is infallible. What is, then, the epistemic status of scientific theory? To resolve this issue Duhem and Poincaré proposed images of fallible knowledge, Instrumentalism and Conventionalism, respectively. Only in 1919–1922, after Einstein's relativity was published, he offered arguments to support Fallibilism, the view that certainty cannot be achieved in science. Though Einstein did not consider Duhem's Instrumentalism, he argued against Poincaré's Conventionalism. Hitherto, Einstein's Fallibilism, as presented at first in a rarely known essay of 1919, was left in the dark. Recently, Howard obscured its meaning. Einstein's essay was never translated into English. In my paper I provide its translation and attempt to shed light on Einstein's view and its context; I also direct attention to Einstein's images of philosophical opportunism in scientific practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Archives

  • Albert Einstein's Archives at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem referred to as EA.

  • Karl Popper's Archives at the Hoover Tower at Stanford University referred to as PA.

Sources

  • Agassi, J.: 1975, Science in Flux, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. XXVIII. Boston: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, M.: 1971, Born-Einstein Letters. (trans. from the German ed. of 1968). N.Y.: Walker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brian, D.: 1996, Einstein: A Life. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1904-5, La théorie physique: son objet sa structure. Paris, 1906, 2d. ed. 1914. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. trans. P.P. Wiener. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1908, ∑ΩZEIN TA ΦAINOMENA, Essai sur la notion de théorie physique de Platon à Galilée. APC:156:113-39, 277-302, 352-77, 482-514, 561-92. Appeared under the same title in a book: Paris: Hermann, To Save the Phenomena. trans. E. Doland & C. Maschler. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. and Glymour, C.: 1980, Relativity and eclipses: The British eclipse expeditions of 1919 and their predecessors, HSPS, 11:1, 48-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1905 Einstein's Miraculous Year: Five Papers that Changed the Face of Earth. ed. J. Stachel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1917, Ueber die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie, Gemeinverständlich, Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1920, Relativity. trans. of Einstein [1917] with an additional appendix III “The Experimental Confirmation of the General Theory of Relativity”. trans. R.W. Lawson, N.Y.: Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1919, “Induktion und Deduktion in der Physik”. Berliner Tageblatt (Suppl. 4:1), 25 December.

  • Einstein, A.: 1922, “Geometry and Experience”, 1921. Translated and expended version was published in Sidelights on Relativity.

  • Einstein, A.: 1933, On the Method of Theoretical Physics. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1949, “Reply to Criticisms” in Schilpp [1949].

  • Eisenstaedt, J.: 1989, “Low water mark in General Relativity”, in J. Stachel & D. Howard, eds., Einstein Studies. Einstein and the History of Relativity.

  • Holton, G.: 1988, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Harvard: Harvard University Press, Rev. ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1984, “Realism and Conventionalism in Einstein's Philosophy of Science: The Einstein-Schlick Correspondence”, Philosophia Naturalis 21: 616-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1990, “Einstein and Duhem”, Synthese 83: 363-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A.: 1994, Einstein Lived Here. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paty, M.: 1993, Einstein philosophe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H.: 1891, Électricité et Optique. 2d. Rev. ed. Paris, 1901. Trans. of its 1st ed. Into German under the title: Elektricität und Optik. Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H.: 1905, Science et Hypothese. Paris, 1902. Science and Hypothesis. trans. W.J.G. N.Y.: The Walter Scott Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1935, Logik der Forschung. Wien: Verlag von J. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1976, Unended Quest. La Salle. III: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.: 1979, “Revolution in the idea of knowledge”, unpublished Frank Nelson Doubleday Lecture. No. 4, April 10th. PA 6-10.

  • Popper, K.: 1996, “Einstein's influence on my view of science”, BBC Broadcast: Given on February 23rd; unpublished. PA 82-17.

  • Schilpp, P.A. ed.: 1949, Albert Einstein. Philosopher-Scientist. Evanston, III. Library of Living Philosophers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, M.: 1920, Space and Time. 2d. Ed. Trans. H.L. Brose, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adam, A.M. Farewell to certitude: Einstein's novelty on Induction and Deduction, Fallibilism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31, 19–37 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008380527490

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008380527490

Navigation