Skip to main content
Log in

A Task-Based Interface to Legal Databases

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the problems that lawyers experience retrieving information from legal-text databases. Traditional access mechanisms of text databases require users to know how information is stored. We propose a method for index organisation which shields lawyers from the internal storage structures and which allows them to address the legal databases in their own legal terms. The proposed index is based on a model of legal tasks as opposed to traditional database indexes which represent the contents of the database. We will lay out the architecture of an information system in which this task model is used to determine the information need, to retrieve relevant documents and to give methodical guidance for the legal task itself. To account for the design of a task-based legal information retrieval system, a substantial part of this paper is devoted to analysis and representation of legal tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agosti, M., Colotti, R., & Gradenigo, G. 1991. A two-level hypertext retrieval model for legal data, in: A. Bookstein, Y. Chiaramella, G. Salton, and V. V. Raghaven (eds.), Proceedings of SIGIR’ 91 Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, October 1991, New York (NY): ACM, pp. 316-325.

  • Bench-Capon, T. J. M. & Staniford, G. 1995. PLAID - Proactive Legal Assistance, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, College Park MD, New York (NY): ACM, pp. 81-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruza, P. D. 1993. Stratified Information Disclosure: A Synthesis between Hypermedia and Informa-tion Retrieval, Phd. thesis University of Nijmegen, Amsterdam: Thesis.

  • Collins, A. & Gentner, D. A. 1980. A Framework for a cognitive theory of writing, in: L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (eds.), Cognitive Processes in Writing. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. 1987. Hypertext: An introduction and survey, in: Computer, Vol. 20, No.9. New York, pp. 17-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, J. P. 1991. Representation of legal text for conceptual retrieval, in: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Oxford 1991, New York (NY): ACM, 1993, pp. 244-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum. [

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. C., Leenes, R., & Lodder, A. R. 1994. Hard cases: A procedural approach, in: Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol. 2, pp. 113-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. 1980. Identifying the Organisation of Writing Processes, in: L.W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (eds.), Cognitive Processes in Writing. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, N. 1980. Legal deduction, legal predicates and expert systems, in: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. Vol. V, No.14, pp. 181-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthijssen, L. J. 1995. An Intelligent Interface for Legal Databases. in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, College Park MD, New York (NY): ACM, pp. 71-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthijssen L. J. 1996. Information Retrieval for legal argumentation tasks, in: Proceedings of the Fifth National/First European Conference on Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, University of Exeter, Exeter: E.U.C.L.I.D., pp. 117-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, Ch. 1969. Olbrechts-Tyteca L., The New Rhetoric: a Treatise on Argumentation, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Translation of Traité de l’argumentation; la nouvelle rhétorique.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakken, H. 1993. Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument, Phd. thesis Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam: Free University of Amsterdam.

  • Royakkers, L. 1996. Representing Legal Rules in Deontic Logic, Phd. thesis Tilburg University, Tilburg: Tilburg University.

  • Salton, G. 1989. Automatic Text Processing, Reading (Mass): Addison-Wesley. Toulmin, S. E. 1958. The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E. 1992. Logic, rhetoric & reason: Redressing the balance, in: F. H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Argumentation Illuminated, Amsterdam: International Centre for the Study of Argumentation (SICSAT), pp. 3-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voermans, W. & Verharen, E. 1993. LEDA: A semi-intelligent legislative drafting-support system, in: J. S. Svensson, J. G. J. Wassink and B. Van Buggenhout (eds.), Legal Knowledge Based Systems, Proceedings 6th International Conference JURIX’ 93, Lelystad: Koninklijke Vermande, pp. 81-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voermans, W. 1995. Modelling the draughtman’s craft: the LEDA-project legimatics and legimatica-projects in the Netherlands, in: C. Biagoli, P. Mercatali, and G. Sartor (eds.), Legimatica: informatica per legiferare, Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, pp. 109-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleznikow, J. & Stranieri, A. 1995. The split-up system: Integrating neural networks and rule-based reasoning in the legal domain, in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, College Park (MD), New York (NY): ACM, pp. 185-194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthijssen, L. A Task-Based Interface to Legal Databases. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, 81–103 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008291611892

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008291611892

Keywords

Navigation