Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Supermarket Competition Using Choice Maps

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we propose a model which combines the spatial interaction models with the latest developments in internal market structure analysis and allows us to infer supermarket competition from revealed preference data. Using a nested logit formulation we model consumers' store choice decisions to be a two stage process in which consumers choose first the suburb and then the store from which to buy groceries. Hence, our method allows retail managers not only to understand the advantage (or disadvantage) of having their store chain in a particular area but also assess the competition within that area. Comparisons to Factor Analytic Choice Map is made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bawa, Kapil, Jane T., Landwehr and Krishna, Aradhna. (1989) “Consumer Response to Retailers', Marketing Environments: An Analysis of Coffee Purchase Data,” Journal of Retailing. 65 (4), 471–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, Siddharth, Greenberg, Edward and Chen, Yuxin. (1998) “MCMC Methods for Fitting and Comparing Multinomial Response Models,” Working Paper. University of Washington.

  • Chintagunta, Pradeep K. (1994) “Heterogenous Logit Model Implications for Brand Positioning,” Journal of Marketing Research. 3 (2), 304–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corstjen, Judith and Corstjen, Marcel. (1996) Store Wars: The Battle for Mindspace and Shelfspace. John Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, Terry. (1988) “Choice Map: Inferring a Product Market Map from Panel Data,” Marketing Science. 7(1), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, Terry. (1991) “Internal Analysis of Market Structure: Recent Developments and Future Prospects,” Marketing Letters. 2, 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, Terry and Michael Keane, P. (1995) “A Factor Analytic Model for Representing the Market Structure in Panel Data,” Journal of Marketing Research. 32, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, Tulin. (1993) “Dynamic Brand Choice and Product Market Signalling under Imperfect Information,” Unpublished Manuscript. University of Alberta.

  • Erdem, Tulin. (1996) “A Dynamic Analysis of Market Structure Based on Panel Data,” Marketing Science. 15(4), 359–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, Tulin and Keane, Michael P. (1996) “Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Goods Market,” Marketing Science. 15(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem, Tulin and Winer, Russell S. (1999) “Econometric Modeling of Competition: A Multi-category Choice Based Mapping Approach,” Journal of Econometrics. 89, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, Stephen J., Kim, Byung-Do, Montgomery, Alan L. and Rossi, Peter E. (1995) “Determinants of Store-Level Price Elasticities,” Journal of Marketing Research. 32 (February), 12–29.

  • Hoch, Stephen J., Dréze Xavier and Purk, Mary E. (1994) “EDLP, Hi-Lo and Margin Arithmetic,” Journal of Marketing. 58 (October), 16–27.

  • Huff, D. L. (1963) “A Probabilistic Analysis of Shopping Center Trade Areas,” Land Economics. 39, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, Wagner and Russell, G. J. (1989) “A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure,” Journal of Marketing Research. 26, 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, Wagner and Russell, G. J. (1992) “Measuring Brand Value with Scanner Data,” International Journal of Research in Marketing. 10 (March), 9–22.

  • Kau, Ah Keng and Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1984) “Patterns of Store Choice”, Journal of Marketing Research. 21 (November), 399–409.

  • Kumar, V. and Leone, Robert P. (1990) “Measuring the Effects of Retail Store Promotions on Brand and Store Substitution,” Journal of Marketing Research. 25 (May), 178–85.

  • Popkowski Leszczyc, Peter T. L. and Timmermans, H. (1997) “Consumer Store Choice Dynamics: An Empirical Analysis of the Competitive Market Structure for Grocery Stores,” Working Paper. University of Alberta.

  • Louviere, J. J. and Gaeth, G. J. (1987) “Decomposing the Determinants of Retail Facility Choice Using the Method of Hierarchical Information Integration: A Supermarket Illustration,” Journal of Retailing. 63, 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, R. E. and Rossi, P. E. (1994) “Exact Likelihood Analysis of the Multinomial Probit Model,” Journal of Econometrics. 64, 207–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1991) “Advances in Computation, Statistical Methods and Testing of Discrete Choice Models,” Marketing Letters. 2, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. J. and Eagle, T. C. (1982) “Context-Induced Parameter Instability in a Disaggregate Stochastic Model of Store Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research. 19, 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1987) Comment on “The Calculation of the Posterior Distribution by Data Augumentation,” by M. A. Tanner and W. H. Wong. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 82, 543–546.

  • Russell, Gary J. and Kamakura, Wagner A. (1994) “Understanding Brand Competition Using Micro and Macro Scanner Data,” Journal of Marketing Research. 31 (2), 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, G. E., Parcells, R. J. and Kern, C. (1984) “A Disaggregate Model for Prediciting Shopping Area Market Attraction,” Journal of Retailing. 60, 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittink, Dick R., Addona, Michael J., Hawkes, William J. and Porter, John C. (1987) “SCAN*PRO: A Model of Promotional Activities on Brand Sales, Based on Store-Level Scanner Data,” unpublished Working Paper. Cornell University.

  • Wrigley, N. and Dunn, R. (1984a) “Stochastic panel-data models of urban shopping behaviour: 1. Purchasing at individual stores in a single city,” Environment and Planning A. 16, 629–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, N. and Dunn, R. (1984b) “Stochastic panel-data models of urban shopping behaviour: 2. Multistore Purchasing patterns and the Dirichlet model,” Environment and Planning A. 16, 759–778.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinha, A. Understanding Supermarket Competition Using Choice Maps. Marketing Letters 11, 21–35 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008190508803

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008190508803

Navigation