Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Critique of R.D. Alexander's Views on Group Selection

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group selection is increasingly being viewed as an important force in human evolution. This paper examines the views of R.D. Alexander, one of the most influential thinkers about human behavior from an evolutionary perspective, on the subject of group selection. Alexander's general conception of evolution is based on the gene-centered approach of G.C. Williams, but he has also emphasized a potential role for group selection in the evolution of individual genomes and in human evolution. Alexander's views are internally inconsistent and underestimate the importance of group selection. Specific themes that Alexander has developed in his account of human evolution are important but are best understood within the framework of multilevel selection theory. From this perspective, Alexander's views on moral systems are not the radical departure from conventional views that he claims, but remain radical in another way more compatible with conventional views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. and Borgia, G.: 1978, ‘Group Selection, Altruism and the Levels of Organization of Life’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9, 449-475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R.D.: 1974, ‘The Evolution of Social Behavior’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 325-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R.D.: 1975, ‘The Search for a General Theory of Behavior’, Behavioral Science 20, 77-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R.D.: 1979, Darwinism and Human Affairs, University of Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R.D.: 1987, The Biology of Moral Systems, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R.D.: 1988, ‘Knowledge, Intent and Morality in Darwin's World’, Quarterly Review of Biology 63, 441-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R.D.: 1989, ‘The Evolution of the Human Psyche’, in P. Mellars and C. Stringer (eds.), The Human Revolution, University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh, pp. 455-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R.D.: 1992, ‘Biological Considerations in the Analysis of Morality’, in M.H. Nitecki and D.V. Nitecki (eds.), Evolutionary Ethics, SUNY Press, Albany, NY, pp. 163-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C.: 1981, ‘Parasitic Selection and Group Selection: A Study of Conflict Interference in Rhesus and Japanese Macaque Monkeys’, in A.B. Chiarelli and R.S. Corruccini (eds.), Primate Behavior and Sociobiology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 161-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C.: 1997a, ‘Emergency Decisions, Cultural Selection Mechanics and Group Selection’, Current Anthropology, in press.

  • Boehm, C.: 1997b, ‘Impact of the Human Egalitarian Syndrome on Darwinian Selection Mechanics’, American Naturalist 150, S100-S121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J.: 1982, ‘Cultural Transmission and the Evolution of Cooperative Behavior’, Human Ecology 10, 325-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J.: 1985, Culture and the Evolutionary Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J.: 1988, ‘The Evolution of Reciprocity in Sizable Groups’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 132, 337-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J.: 1989, ‘The Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity’, Social Networks 11, 213-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J.: 1990, ‘Group Selection Among Alternative Evolutionarily Stable Strategies’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 145, 331-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J.: 1990, ‘Culture and Cooperation’, in J.J. Mansbridge (eds.), Beyond Self-Interest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 111-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.J.: 1992, ‘Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (or Anything Else) in Sizable Groups’, Ethology and Sociobiology 13, 171-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, M.: 1994, The Secret Chain: Evolution and Ethics, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.: 1994, The Evolution of Desire, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T.: 1979, ‘Comments on the Sociobiology of Ethics and Moralizing’, Behavioral Science 24, 37-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T.: 1983, ‘The Two Distinct Routes Beyond Kin Selection to Ultra-Sociality: Implications for the Humanities and Social Sciences’, in D.L. Bridgeman (ed.), The Nature of Prosocial Development: Interdisciplinary Theories and Strategies, Academic Press, New York, pp. 11-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T.: 1991, ‘A Naturalistic Theory of Archaic Moral Orders’, Zygon 26, 91-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T.: 1994, ‘How Individual and Face-to-Face-Group Selection Undermine Firm Selection in Organizational Evolution’, in J.A.C. Baum and J.V. Singh (eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 23-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chepko-Sade, B.D., Dow, M.M. and Cheverud, J.M.: 1988, ‘Group Selection Models with Population Substructure Based on Social Interaction Networks’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 77, 427-433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, H.: 1991, The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. and Wilson, M.: 1988, Homicide, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1871, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1976, The Selfish Gene (1st ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1978, ‘Replicator Selection and the Extended Phenotype’, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 47, 61-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1982, The Extended Phenotype, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R.: 1989, The Selfish Gene (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.: 1982, ‘Warfare, Man's Indoctinability and Group Selection’, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 60, 177-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, C.S.: 1992, ‘Phenotypic Evolution Under Gene-Culture Transmission in Structured Populations’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 156, 387-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fix, A.G.: 1985, ‘Evolution of Altruism In Kin-Structured and Random Subdivided Populations’, Evolution 39, 928-939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M.E. and Taylor, B.L.: 1988, ‘Comment on Harpending and Roger's Model of Intergroup Selection’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 135, 131-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A.: 1984, ‘Natural Selection, Kin Selection and Group Selection’, in J. Krebs and N. Davies (eds.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 62-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S.: 1932, The Causes of Evolution, Longmans Green and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D.: 1963, ‘The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior’, American Naturalist 97, 354-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D.: 1964a, ‘The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior, I’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D.: 1964b, ‘The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior, II’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 17-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D.: 1975, ‘Innate Social Aptitudes in Man, an Approach from Evolutionary Genetics’, in R. Fox (eds.), Biosocial Anthropology, Malaby Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D.: 1987, ‘Discriminating Nepotism: Expectable, Common, Overlooked’, in D.J.C. Fletcher and C.D. Michener (eds.), Kin Recognition in Animals, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D.: 1996, The Narrow Roads of Gene Land, W.H. Freeman/Spektrum, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpending, H.C. and Rogers, A.R.: 1987, ‘On Wright's Mechanism for Intergroup Selection’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 127, 51-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K.: 1993, ‘Why Hunter-Gatherers Work: An Ancient Version of the Problem of Public Goods’, Current Anthropology 34, 341-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D.D.: 1990, ‘Collective Sanctions and Compliance Norms: A Formal Theory of Group-Mediated Social Control’, American Sociological Review 55, 366-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D.D.: 1993, ‘Collective Action and Group Heterogeneity: Voluntary Provision vs. Selective Incentives’, American Sociological Review 58, 329-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K.B.: 1994, A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, Praeger, Westport, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, G.: 1989, ‘Population Structure, Spite and the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 77, 459-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, G.B.: 1991, ‘Crossing Malthusian Boundaries: Evolutionary Stability in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma’, Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 3, 159-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.J.: 1987, Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A.R.: 1990, ‘Group Selection by Selective Emmigration: The Effects of Migration and Kin Structure’, American Naturalist 135, 398-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1986, Taking Darwin Seriously, Basil Blackwell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J.P.: 1989, ‘Genetic Similarity, Human Altruism and Group Selection’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, 503-559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S.: 1994, ‘A Critical Review of Philosophical work on the Units of Selection Problem, Philosophy of Science 61, 534-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S.: 1998, Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K.: 1997, ‘The Return of the Group’, Philosophy of Science, in press.

  • Symons, D.: 1987, ‘If We're All Darwinians, What's All the Fuss About?’, in C.B. Crawford, M.F. Smith and D.L. Krebs (eds.), Sociobiology and Psychology: Ideas, Issues and Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorzanger, B.: 1984, ‘Altruism in Sociobiology: A Conceptual Analysis’, 13, 33-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C.: 1986, ‘A Defence of Reductionism in Evolutionary Biology’, in R.A. and M.R. Dawkins (eds.), Oxforf Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C.: 1992, Natural Selection: Domains, Levels and Challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S.: 1975, ‘A Theory of Group Selection’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 72, 143-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S.: 1980, The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities, Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S.: 1989, ‘Levels of Selection: An Alternative to Individualism in Biology and the Social Sciences’, Social Networks 11, 257-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S.: 1990, ‘Species of Thought: A Comment on Evolutionary Epistemology’, Biology and Philosophy 5, 37-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S.: 1995, ‘Language as a Community of Interaction Belief Systems: A Case Study Involving Conduct Toward Self and Others’, Biology and Philosophy 10, 77-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S.: 1997, ‘Incorporating Group Selection into the Adaptationist Program: A Case Study Involving Human Decision Making’, in J. Simpson and D. Kendrick (eds.), Evolutionary Social Psychology, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 345-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S. and Dugatkin, L.A.: 1997, ‘Group Selection and Assortative Interactions’, American Naturalist 149, 336-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S., Pollock, G.B. and Dugatkin, L.A.: 1992, ‘Can Altruism Evolve in Purely Viscous Populations?’, Evolutionary Ecology 6, 331-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S. and Sober, E.: 1994, ‘Re-Introducing Group Selection to the Human Behavioral Sciences’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, 585-654.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York, 13902-6000, U.S.A. e-mail

    David Sloan Wilson

Authors
  1. David Sloan Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, D.S. A Critique of R.D. Alexander's Views on Group Selection. Biology & Philosophy 14, 431–449 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006577511789

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006577511789

Search

Navigation